Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Why is Drudgereport ignoring PizzaGate?
11/28/16 | Self

Posted on 11/28/2016 12:18:23 PM PST by The_Republic_Of_Maine

For the life of me I cannot figure out why Drudgereport is ignoring the PizzaGate story.


TOPICS: Chit/Chat; Society
KEYWORDS: acp; conspiracytheory; drudge; pizzagate; vanity
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 201-220221-240241-260 ... 281-287 next last
To: discostu

They’re eating babies now, haven’t you heard?
We have no evidence they don’t, so it must be true.
Because—kinky art.


221 posted on 11/28/2016 4:33:36 PM PST by mumblypeg (Make America Macho Again.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: nerdgirl

You’ve been here since 2004, lol. You’re probably older than me.


222 posted on 11/28/2016 4:34:24 PM PST by miss marmelstein
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 219 | View Replies]

To: miss marmelstein

Name calling again? Your posts have been rude, personal attacks. They lack substance. I write algorithms for a living. Sort of speaks for itself.


223 posted on 11/28/2016 4:35:56 PM PST by nerdgirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 220 | View Replies]

To: miss marmelstein

Not many people under 70 are shuffling off to the library, and don’t know that they don’t need to join Twitter in order to see a feed. Maybe your caregiver can adjust the meds? Could help lucidity.


224 posted on 11/28/2016 4:37:14 PM PST by nerdgirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 222 | View Replies]

To: nerdgirl

Which explains why you can’t write logical analyses of other people’s theories. Or understand the Salem Witch Trials, lol. Weird women!


225 posted on 11/28/2016 4:37:28 PM PST by miss marmelstein
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 223 | View Replies]

To: workerbee
I have pictures of my kids, as babies, naked in the bathtub

Great, but I fail to see the relevance as the Comet Pizza owner doesn't have any kids of his own, despite all the pictures of children he had on his instagram, along with the questionable comments he and others posted as captions.

226 posted on 11/28/2016 4:37:29 PM PST by Golden Eagle (In God We Trust)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 182 | View Replies]

To: miss marmelstein

Ouch you’re on a roll. Shows you must have a PhD from MIT.


227 posted on 11/28/2016 4:39:28 PM PST by nerdgirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 225 | View Replies]

To: nerdgirl
I never said it can’t possibly be true.

Well if you didn't, you did everything but say those exact words in your insistence there is nothing to see here.

In this country you are innocent until proven guilty

Of course, but it takes time to prove guilt over any shadow of doubt. For some reason a few people don't want the possibility of guilt to even be considered, even though this is the Clintons we're talking about, remember.

228 posted on 11/28/2016 4:41:08 PM PST by Golden Eagle (In God We Trust)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 189 | View Replies]

To: workerbee
almost no one is claiming "it can't possibly be true."

That's pretty much what I'm seeing, from a few here, along with the suggestions we're basically inconsiderate imbeciles for even wanting to see any further discussion of it go forward, despite the possibly involvement of the Clintons.

it was Drudge who broke the Lewinsky story

The cutting edge medium of .... 20 years ago. This scandal is being investigated by the modern day Drudge Reports.

229 posted on 11/28/2016 4:46:19 PM PST by Golden Eagle (In God We Trust)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 190 | View Replies]

To: Golden Eagle

sorry I never said nothing to see. I said the “smoking guns” lack bite.

Prosecuting Podesta publicly without solid evidence makes the right look fringe, and undermines their credibility.

Go after him by all means, but get something irrefutable before blasting it out on 100 right wing “news” sites.


230 posted on 11/28/2016 4:46:30 PM PST by nerdgirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 228 | View Replies]

To: nerdgirl

No, just a degree in English Literature. Begone! Before someone drops a house on one of your algorithms.


231 posted on 11/28/2016 4:47:02 PM PST by miss marmelstein
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 227 | View Replies]

To: miss marmelstein
Anyone who knows anything about photography - and babies - knows the greenbacks were posed prettily

You can't refer to your own assumptions as proof of guilt. i.e. my knowledge of babies chewing things is no more "proof" of Podesta et.al.'s innocence than your knowledge of photography is of their guilt.

I, and many others, have said - you may be entirely right. This MAY, God forbid, be a global sex trafficking ring. But what's been presented so far is hardly enough to make a legal case. As I pointed out, it was Drudge who broke the Lewinsky story. He's not "holding out" on pizzagate because he's blind.

Can we at least agree that more substantial proof is warranted? Does doubt make someone your enemy? I don't believe that.

232 posted on 11/28/2016 4:49:29 PM PST by workerbee (The President of the United States is public enemy #1)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 214 | View Replies]

To: Geronimo
If James Alefantis is innocent then why isn’t he taking legal action against guys like David Seaman who openly call him out on youtube & twitter as a pedophile running a pedophile ring out of his Comet Pizza business.

A very good question. A simpler one is, if he and his employee's Instagram accounts didn't contain possibly incriminating evidence against them, why did they all so quickly block access? The picture of a very young girl bound to a table as she was would typically be more than enough for child protective services to investigate if this was going on in many people's homes. And not one parent of any of the children has come forward in his defense, wonder if they're even still involved in these child's lives?

233 posted on 11/28/2016 4:50:59 PM PST by Golden Eagle (In God We Trust)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 195 | View Replies]

To: miss marmelstein

Just what the world needs, more vicious New Yorkers with “Literature” degrees, who can’t take what they dish out.

Not a lot of tolerance for your kind up here in Alaska.

Good riddance.


234 posted on 11/28/2016 4:51:17 PM PST by nerdgirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 231 | View Replies]

To: workerbee

Who said I said this was proof beyond reasonable doubt? We simply are discussing the theory known as pizzagate but some of you guys, tonight, rushed in to squash all discussion. Which obviously is not going to happen any time soon unless the owners decide it is verboten.

It is not the baby chewing that gives the photo away - it is the arrangement of the cash. No baby fingers could arrange it like that. Whether it is creepy or not is in the eye of the beholder. It is not pornography and I never said it was. But, if you believe that this is a pedo/baby selling operation - no, not proved but suspected - that photo plays into that suspicion. Please, believe what you want to believe but don’t shut down discussion. Simply avoid these threads.


235 posted on 11/28/2016 4:55:46 PM PST by miss marmelstein
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 232 | View Replies]

To: Golden Eagle

What bothered me the most was not that instagram photo but the one of a man holding a baby and the words “chicken hawk” written alongside. That was Alefantis remarks or a friend of his as I remember. That scared the hell out of me.


236 posted on 11/28/2016 4:58:33 PM PST by miss marmelstein
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 233 | View Replies]

To: workerbee

This thread has degenerated into mostly name calling and pigeon holing rather than discourse. I posted here initially because discussion on PizzaGate certainly IS warranted - but rather than bring additional facts they’ve found, people seem content to just tell you you’re on the wrong side if you don’t accept that this is evidence enough.

What’s great about forums is the occasional bright light who although you may not completely agree with them, brings up valid points and makes you rethink your own stance. Not exactly how this thread has gone.


237 posted on 11/28/2016 5:01:48 PM PST by nerdgirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 232 | View Replies]

To: nerdgirl
sorry I never said nothing to see.

Hilarious, if it wasn't so serious. You've apparently been here so long today defending Podesta you've forgotten what all you've written. Here's some excerpts from just ONE of your posts today:

This story has so many holes Arnold could drive his hummer through them. The Podesta link to a murder in Portugal is pretty outrageous...there is zero evidence...Twitter is full of people making huge leaps of logic in order to string together their “strong case” against the Podestas, which they then link to this loser stick who runs the Comet Pizza joint...You’re gonna need more than a few crappy logos that resemble FBI peso signs..and video laughing about pedophilia.

Evidence? It’s really atrocious. “Spirit Dinner” with no proof it was anything other than an elite fest of like minded liberals...horrific shock art in his house - doesn’t mean the emails about Pizza were anything but. I urge FReepers to look at how many leaps of logic you are required to make, and dots you are required to connect yourself, in order to believe this PizzaGate stuff has merit. There may be some shady crap going on in DC, but I don’t think John Podesta is at the center of it.

238 posted on 11/28/2016 5:04:14 PM PST by Golden Eagle (In God We Trust)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 230 | View Replies]

To: Golden Eagle

Pizzagate may end up proving something about the owner of Comet Pizza - or somebody else - but I certainly stand by the statement that the evidence against Podesta doesn’t have any merit so far. Extraordinary claims here are met with weak and uncorroborated “evidence”.

He’s being accused of kidnapping, murder and pedophilia, which are very serious accusations.


239 posted on 11/28/2016 5:09:41 PM PST by nerdgirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 238 | View Replies]

To: workerbee
Can we at least agree that more substantial proof is warranted?

Of course. But when are those who are screaming this is all so unfair to investigate the Clintons and their contacts going to to admit that further investigation will be required to gather more proof, should it exist? It was just yesterday that the tweet from Andrew Brietbart accusing Podesta of child trafficking was found.

That will only increase the interest of those looking into this, whether that further upsets the protestors or not. What the Clintons were doing in Haiti with convicted child trafficker Laura Silsby is another thing that needs to be further checked out, along with the researcher into this very subject that was recently murdered. Or have you not heard?

240 posted on 11/28/2016 5:10:00 PM PST by Golden Eagle (In God We Trust)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 232 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 201-220221-240241-260 ... 281-287 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson