Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: wtd

If this Special Forces Officer knows that 242 Soldiers were killed when only eight were reported, then it was his duty to go public with his face in front of a camera about it.

There is no excuse, none, for not doing that.

The fact that he is supposedly making these accusations anonymously leads me to believe this is bull shirt.


10 posted on 08/29/2017 5:16:16 PM PDT by blueunicorn6 ("A crack shot and a good dancer")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: blueunicorn6

You are right. Another BS clickbait site that lures the suckers in.


14 posted on 08/29/2017 5:20:13 PM PDT by Strac6 ("Mrs. Strac, Pilatus, and Sig Sauer: All the fun things in my life are Swiss!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: blueunicorn6
Well, the piece you know about is bs. The piece I know about is bs, and I am guessing a lot of the rest is bs too.

And, somehow with Kelly in the WH a lot of this nonsense has gotten awfully quiet.

19 posted on 08/29/2017 6:39:50 PM PDT by AndyJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: blueunicorn6

You are so right. It’s total BS.


21 posted on 08/29/2017 7:02:44 PM PDT by Strac6 ("Mrs. Strac, Pilatus, and Sig Sauer: All the fun things in my life are Swiss!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: blueunicorn6

It’s not his duty to “go public.” There are appropriate channels for whistleblowing, and “going public” is not one of them, even if some creativity has to be called on to get the information into the appropriate investigator’s hands if normal channels fail.


28 posted on 08/30/2017 2:58:07 AM PDT by piasa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: blueunicorn6

It’s not his duty to “go public.” There are appropriate channels for whistleblowing, and “going public” is not one of them, even if some creativity has to be called on to get the information into the appropriate investigator’s hands if normal channels fail.

(As for it being BS, though, I’d have to agree. )


29 posted on 08/30/2017 3:03:49 AM PDT by piasa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: blueunicorn6

Yeah huge red flags about the credibility of the whole article. Same with the reported losses of main battle tanks.

This is one of two things. 1. Trash. 2. Evidence of a historical cover up on a truely monumental scale.


34 posted on 08/30/2017 7:28:05 AM PDT by DariusBane (Liberty and Risk. Flip sides of the same coin. So how much risk will YOU accept? Vive Deo et Vives)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson