To: heterosupremacist
Former St. Louis Police Officer Jason Stockley
2 posted on
09/16/2017 3:13:59 PM PDT by
heterosupremacist
(Domine Iesu Christe, Filius Dei, miserere me peccatorem!)
To: heterosupremacist
I read the pdf file of the judge's decision.It seems that self defense was much more likely than “murder”.Sounds like the cop was smart to opt for a “bench trial”...it seems likely that he would faced an OJ jury.
To: heterosupremacist
Looks like the Judge did a good job weighing the evidence he had to work with. Not a good idea to run from the police.
5 posted on
09/16/2017 3:32:43 PM PDT by
willk
(everyone)
To: heterosupremacist
Why was the date line “Wichita”? Wichita is a 7 hour drive from St. Louis.
6 posted on
09/16/2017 3:33:58 PM PDT by
Mercat
(I know my redeemer lives.)
To: heterosupremacist
“Finally, the Court observes, based on its nearly thirty years on the bench, that an urban heroin dealer not in possession of a firearm would be an anomaly, the judge wrote.
7 posted on
09/16/2017 3:34:32 PM PDT by
gunnut
To: heterosupremacist
His life is ruined. I hope he can work as a cop again.
He almost was a sacrificial lamb - the hated “White” who is blamed for all the evils of the world.
The street savages will use this as an excuse to loot, burn, and shoot cops.
12 posted on
09/16/2017 3:47:40 PM PDT by
I want the USA back
(Cynicism is the only option for remaining sane in a criminally insane world.)
To: heterosupremacist
The left wants a double standard in criminal courts too; one for gang bangers and one for white cops. That’s what’s happened to the rule of law in this country.
15 posted on
09/16/2017 3:54:47 PM PDT by
Spok
("What're you going to believe-me or your own eyes?" -Marx (GrouchNewo))
To: heterosupremacist
We don’t have perfection, but a country that can still argue about such matters has hope. It’s when the arguments stop and the stones and bullets fly that we have lost reason.
16 posted on
09/16/2017 3:58:23 PM PDT by
HiTech RedNeck
(Tryin' hard to win the No-Bull Prize.)
To: heterosupremacist
If you watch the video it clearly appears justified.
Also the prosecution never charged that he planted the gun.
Pure speculation on the part of the dindu nuffins.
Sure doesn't look like he had the opportunity.
26 posted on
09/16/2017 7:08:51 PM PDT by
Eagles6
To: heterosupremacist
It was not until 15 seconds after Stockley arrived the drivers side door that he took his service revolver out of its holster and fired several shots. No police department in 2011 was still issuing revolvers. Again, idiot reporters have no clue when it comes to firearms.
28 posted on
09/16/2017 7:46:58 PM PDT by
AlaskaErik
(I served and protected my country for 31 years. Progressives spent that time trying to destroy it.)
To: heterosupremacist
St. Louis voted to allow these violent acts of domestic terrorism when they elected the Demonicrat kakistocracy to run the city. Whatever happens to St. Louis, like with Detroit, Chicago, Baltimore, etc., they brought it on themselves.
Voters in other cities should note well: Your city will be destroyed when you vote to put Demonicrats in charge.
To: heterosupremacist
Prosecutors, acting on the emotional needs of a largely uninformed and perpetually aggrieved segment of society, will tend to over-charge crap they can't prove. Exhibit A, Marilyn Mosby, Esq., Baltimore State's Attorney, charged 6 cops in the Freddy Gray case with crimes, which in order to find guilt, must have an element of "intent". 3 acquittals, 3 dropped charges, IIRC. Mosby 0 for 6.
In this case, 1st Degree (pre-meditated) murder was definitely an over charge. But when dealing with the BLM crowd, keep your facts at home, they won't matter.
32 posted on
09/17/2017 6:54:48 AM PDT by
Hat-Trick
(Do you trust a government that cannot trust you with guns?)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson