Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Pentagon Recommends Requiring Women to Sign Up for Draft
Breitbart ^ | October 26, 2017 | Katherine Rodriguez

Posted on 10/27/2017 6:55:03 AM PDT by C19fan

The Pentagon recommended that women be required to register for the draft to boost military enrollment, according to a Defense Department report addressed to Congress. The report, obtained by the Washington Times, said the Selective Service System would increase enrollment by 11 million people if the U.S. required women to sign up for the draft.

(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...


TOPICS: Military/Veterans; Society
KEYWORDS: draft; women
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-138 next last
To: blueunicorn6

“You may not want your petite daughter in the Infantry, but you can thank your cousin Suzie and your sister Ann for forcing them to be there”

Then Suzie and Ann can volunteer. The answer isn’t for a man to support drafting Americas petite daughters. And a trite response isn’t changing a thing, it’s a hard leftist position to support it. Its shameful for a conservative to support that petite girl and pretend they deserved it.

If they go that route, ill undermine it, help with draft dodging, and monkeywrench sabotage it everyway I can thing of. And anyone who knocks at the door about it... gets what a kidnapper would normally get.


41 posted on 10/27/2017 7:53:48 AM PDT by DesertRhino (Dog is man's best friend, and moslems hate dogs. Add that up. ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: WilliamIII

I didn’t say I thought it was a good idea. To the contrary women in combat roles is foolishness

Since we have an all volunteer force why is there still a draft?


42 posted on 10/27/2017 7:54:29 AM PDT by Nifster (I see puppy dogs in the clouds)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Georgia Girl 2; grey_whiskers

“I’m sorry the pretty girls wouldn’t date you in high school but maybe time to move on.”

Such an intelligent reply.


43 posted on 10/27/2017 7:57:01 AM PDT by alternatives? (Why have an army if there are no borders?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Nifster

For social engineering.

Besides, another reason for opposing it is that todays military is engineered and run by perverts, revolutionary socialists, and enforces brutal policies against Christianity. The force feed them homosexuality and tranny crap.

Kids should avoid it like the plague for now.


44 posted on 10/27/2017 7:58:12 AM PDT by DesertRhino (Dog is man's best friend, and moslems hate dogs. Add that up. ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: alternatives?

Oh so you had the same problem. :-)


45 posted on 10/27/2017 8:00:21 AM PDT by Georgia Girl 2 (The only purpose of a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Nifster

Also, a good reason for avoiding wars of convenience is that -every war- soon results in a food in immigration from the area in question.

Brace for a wave from Africa’s new wars next.


46 posted on 10/27/2017 8:01:19 AM PDT by DesertRhino (Dog is man's best friend, and moslems hate dogs. Add that up. ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: DesertRhino

My personal feeling is that females shouldn’t be in the Combat Arms.

It’s bad enough that young men die in combat, but killing young women is killing the future.

That said, there is no reason to preclude females from the draft if they can serve in every job in the military.

You can huff and puff about what you’ll do, but your daughter’s fellow females demanded this.


47 posted on 10/27/2017 8:02:13 AM PDT by blueunicorn6 ("A crack shot and a good dancer")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: C19fan

“Killing off large numbers of fertile women spells future demographic problems.”

Really? Women 18-25 having children? Are you kidding me? They are too busy spending their time in the club getting drunk until 4 am and having random sex with five different guys a week.

America women aren’t worth giving them the time of day. They’ve fought all of these years for “equality” give it to them. Their are tons of Asian/Eastern European women that are willing to be traditional wives for good American men.


48 posted on 10/27/2017 8:03:54 AM PDT by WilliamCooper1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Georgia Girl 2

They aren’t totally right, but neither are you. When a man complains about anything of that nature, there are soon a bevy of idiot women who show up and say he must be a repressed homo, or that attractive women rejected him.

Its a transparent attempt to silence such men with shaming. It actually reveals you as a perfect example of the kind of female they were complaining about.

Give it a rest, your tactic doesn’t work.


49 posted on 10/27/2017 8:06:37 AM PDT by DesertRhino (Dog is man's best friend, and moslems hate dogs. Add that up. ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: blueunicorn6

That’s a jackass mentality to happily punish Americas decent petite girls because of the ones you want to get even with.

Any other bright ideas?


50 posted on 10/27/2017 8:07:52 AM PDT by DesertRhino (Dog is man's best friend, and moslems hate dogs. Add that up. ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Georgia Girl 2
"Where have all the good men gone" -- every empowered woman ever when she hits the wall, and the hot men at the bars start chasing women younger than her.

Chastity before marriage, and marriage and children young, is the way to go.

51 posted on 10/27/2017 8:08:24 AM PDT by grey_whiskers (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: DesertRhino

All hyperbole aside, I think that young women of age, should register for selective service, just as the young men do.
It doesn’t mean that there ever will be an actual draft.
But if there is, I believe all should serve not just (essentially) half.

There are a plethora of roles in military service that are not direct combat. They aren’t going to force a 110lb woman into a “tip of the spear” role.


52 posted on 10/27/2017 8:09:02 AM PDT by Arthurive
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: WilliamCooper1
Small town girls sometimes work if you can land them before they've discovered the carousel.
53 posted on 10/27/2017 8:10:35 AM PDT by grey_whiskers (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: C19fan

Tic - Tac.... ?


54 posted on 10/27/2017 8:12:30 AM PDT by traumer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: C19fan

No.

Despite everything they have attempted to do related to putting women into combat and despite all the arguments about how women are equal, women are not physically as capable as men.

Structurally their bodies are different, and while yes there are the outliers, they cannot meet the standards required.

The standards are the only thing that should drive these discussions, but they are being drowned out by the BS.


55 posted on 10/27/2017 8:12:42 AM PDT by reed13k
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: grey_whiskers

“Where have all the good men gone” — every empowered woman ever when she hits the wall, and the hot men at the bars start chasing women younger than her.

Yea, that’s the best. “Where have all of the good men gone?” Well, they were after you in your 20s and 30s, but you were too busy in the bars chasing UFC guy and the guy with coke.

Now, you’re 40, two kids from two men, and unmarried. The “good man” likely found a girl at church or imported a wife and now has three kids and a nice middle class home.


56 posted on 10/27/2017 8:19:02 AM PDT by WilliamCooper1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: DesertRhino

You are apparently unaware that one of the posters here is a serial woman-hater. I suggest you look at his history here and then think about why some women hit back with the homo/woman hater stuff, ok?


57 posted on 10/27/2017 8:19:12 AM PDT by miss marmelstein
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: Georgia Girl 2; grey_whiskers

“c*ck carousel; dried up cat ladies; women generally don’t like to be held accountable;”

Sounds like grey hairs has more than a tad of bitterness and vitriol towards my three daughters. Being uninformed isn’t what we generally expect FReepers to be like, but apparently he hasn’t been held accountable recently.


58 posted on 10/27/2017 8:20:00 AM PDT by ColoCdn (Neco eos omnes, Deus suos agnoset)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: miss marmelstein
Vox Day's second law.

SJWs always *project*.

59 posted on 10/27/2017 8:20:16 AM PDT by grey_whiskers (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: grey_whiskers

Your history is online for anyone to check out. You introduce grotesque sexual comments/anti-women stuff into ordinary subjects.


60 posted on 10/27/2017 8:22:06 AM PDT by miss marmelstein
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-138 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson