Posted on 01/25/2018 8:46:49 AM PST by MNDude
As we have seen, it seems like freerepublic has been divided into the two denominations. The Q Believers, and the Q disbelievers. Based on the claims that he made, I believe he will very shortly be either be proved or disproved. I think it would be fun to make a wager based off of this.
We can establish several specific things that he said would happen. For example, the undeleted text messages would reveal in assassination plot against President Trump or his family with the help of a foreign National Ally. Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama will be arrested and will be proved to be part of a child trafficking, child sacrificing, satanic ring. Hundreds of those who we're involved will be arrested around the country and the world. Something like that.
If certain events do not happen by a certain date, like let's say May 1st or something, although I feel confident they'll happen much sooner, the Believers will be proved wrong. The believer would then have to make the following post on Free Republic. " I MNDude (or whoever) a tinfoil hat wearing kook. I believe silly Anonymous posters on the internet."
If it is proved to be true, then the disbelievers would have to post the following. I Caww or whoever) am a MSM follower. I only get my news from Anderson Cooper.
The loser would then have to change their tagline to say "I was wrong" and keep it there for 1 week.
I think I am ready to put my chips on the table. Are you game?
Sounds like you and I have more in common than you think. :)
I’ve been here since 11/98, btw. Not quite as long. I’m using my wife’s account because I need to get mine re-instated.
Changed my position .. now an agnostic Russian bot, according to the enemedia.
My position: At the risk of sounding wishy-washy, I’m leaning agnostic.
Q has been right about a lot. I believe he definitely has some insight and is not just guessing. But the cryptic nature of the messages is a bit off-putting and puzzling. Is the cryptic nature because he’s hedging his bets in case he’s wrong? Or could it be a timing issue? Is he vague because things take time and he can’t really predict how long things will take? No one can foresee every event and every unexpected hurdle, so that might account for a lot of the vagueness, too. He’s giving himself some wiggle room for those unexpected plot twists. Even if he’s a Trump insider, he can’t predict what wacky new thing the democrats/libs/media are going to throw out there.
Possibilities:
1. Q is an excellent student of human nature and is paying attention to the actual facts and extrapolating sensibly.
2. Q is an insider in the Trump administration acting to help the President, but without his knowledge. Trying to pave the way for the public to accept and understand what is going to be revealed in the memos, emails, texts, etc.
3. Same as 2, but with Trump’s knowledge and support.
4. Just a crackpot.
I don’t think it’s 4. #3 would surprise me the least.
I think we’re going to learn a LOT in the State of the Union. I’m stocking up on popcorn!
Q is a FALSE PROPHET. I await the coming of R, the TRUE ONE.
Unlike previous Republican Presidents, Trump has some savvy political operators on his side.
Hold on, incoming message.
I'm in. I'll bet "Not Going to Happen."
The vagueness could well be a security shield.
I think Q is not what he/she claims to be, at the very least. The “Q” clearance is a DoE clearance that has little to do with the kind of information Q claims to have access to. When I asked Q some simple questions (e.g. series, job title, other things only fedgov would know) to prove he/she is in the sort of position that would have access to this information, I got no response, despite Q replying to many other questions. Also, numerous comments by Q that are inconsistent with how fedgov works. It is however possible that Q is a whitehouse insider/ journalist with insider access and the whole “Q” persona is a cover story and the key disclosures are a filtered version of truth. We will see.
Q has made four huge, major, *dead wrong* predictions already. 100% wrong. That’s easily documented.
However, having discerned Q’s identity as of yesterday, I can say he’s legitimate as far as that goes. I.e.: he’s not a larper or a fraud. He’s just not nearly as well connected as his biggest supporters imagine. He posts to the best of his knowledge but A, his knowledge is limited, and B, he is laboring under at least one very fundamental, pivotal misconception.
So where do I fit in terms of a category?
I’m not an MSN follower nor have I ever watched Anderson Cooper.
I am a critical thinker, however, and I’ve done my own research and thinking on this and “Q” comes up way short.
If Clinton and Obama are arrested and charged with child trafficking by May 1st of this year I will GLADLY change my tagline to “I was wrong” and leave it there for a week.
I’m in; “Q” is a fraud.
I am thinking I agree. People seem to not remember what Obama did to Trump a few years back at the Press club dinner...
And his revenge was sweet after he was elected. He stood right there and trashed both Clinton and Obama.
Yes Im in the agnostic camp and along for the ride, where ever that leads. I dont know it seems like were almost there, but never there.
‘But those who dont think so are NOT trolls to me.’
That’s the spirit. I’m trying to figure out how to monetize the troll name-calling that’s been directed my way. If I succeed, I’ll buy another annuity.
I remember when you were Robroy!
My thing about your brother the other day was a joke! You got to admit, the username did sounded funny.
Alrighty then MNDude.
As a fellow Minnesotan and having been directed by Q to remain united, I will throw my hat in the ring with yours.
We might loose the wager, but it is a fun ride. I am reminded of a couple other old sayings like, “no foul, no gain and no guts, no glory; among others.”
Personally, I think Julian Assange is a major player in the Qanon phenomena. I believe he has access to a lot of classified material, not all of it pertinent nor quite accurate all the time; some of it is outdated by now. But that information is close enough to help people be enlightened. Today people are calling this eating the red pill.
Anyway, that’s my 2 cents, I’m in.
Kalam
(PS. ransomnote thanks for doing the pinging.)
Well, If you are that firm in believing you know who he/she is then share?
If I were to wager, i’d place 100 dollars on the 1000 to 1 odds of Bannon.
:-D
I became Cuban Leaf, and was temp banned a a couple of times because I didn’t toe the line about trump during the primary. I then became Mr. Douglas, because that was what my neighbors called me when I moved from Seattle to rural KY. The name fit a lot better.
But that was banned as a retread. So I’m stuck with using my wife’s account or trying to get Robroy re-instated after my run-in with Jean S, who I notice has not posted since 2014.
The Q supporters would lose their marbles if I posted the identity. They believe Q would be Seth Riched if his name gets out.
I don’t think that Q cares whether or not you, me, or anyone “believes” in him/her/they. Q is not promoting his own self-glorification.
Q is interested in all of us taking the RED PILL.
For those of you who do not know what that means.......
the quote in a popular movie said:
“After this, there is no turning back. You take the blue pillthe story ends, you wake up in your bed and believe whatever you want to believe. You take the red pillyou stay in Wonderland, and I show you how deep the rabbit hole goes. Remember: all I’m offering is the truth.”
Q is just offering the truth and he wants to spread that to as many people as possible. It will be important that when all the arrests begin to happen, that enough of us already know the truth about what has been going on. I don’t know if Q is a geeky nerd or the President himself, and I don’t care. I do know he/she/they are doing a good job getting people to pay attention to what’s going on in the depths of the rabbit hole.
So if it ends up that I am wrong, I’ll admit it. If I end up right, then I won’t need to brag as we all will much too busy celebrating MAGA.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.