Hold on, incoming message.
ransomnote; bagster
Who would have ever thought the FBI and the numerous bad actors...
...would be weaponized AGAINST a sitting President.
Yes, at this point I would believe just about anything.....
Either way, everyone's powder should be kept dry, and preps stocked as well as possible.
/.02
No room for “Q” agnostics? In any event, he gives nothing that we can play off of, but to sit back and enjoy the ride. The exception is his advice to “Stay United”. The MSM/Deep State types are doing that for him. If we don’t go to the wall to protect Trump, we will get nothing but John Ellis Bushes and Willard Romneys forever.
Also sticking with my earlier prediction that, one way or another, a true sh!t storm will have hit DC by the end of next week.
I believe that whoever Q is, man/woman/team, they have access to the President and he's involved in what is being revealed. And to be precise...he said Hillary and Obama should hang, not that they would. Don't forget...60% will remain secret for the good of humanity. I'd love to see them both swinging from a tree but I don't expect it.
Oh...and another thing. He said we'd see pictures and videos, not just words in the future. If images proving cabal black hat crimes are revealed that should put an end to the speculation.
ML/NJ
Can I be a Trump supporter, believe the FBI and other agencies are corrupt and believe this Qdude is a nostradramasist?
Do you believe in Santa Claus, or don’t you believe in Santa Claus? There was a real one, back in the beginning. He was a literal saint. Then, there was the Dutch Sinterklaas and all the derivatives scattered across Continental Europe. The English Father Christmas, can’t forget him. Eventually Macy’s entered the picture and the classic jolly old bearded elf in a red suit and hat with white ermine trim entered the picture, to great marketing and financial success for numerous retailers.
So, there actually was a real Santa Claus. Do you believe in him, or do you believe in the various interpretations and legends of him?
I am HOPEFUL Q is for real, but having been burned numerous times*. I am DOUBTFUL he is.
I think the majority of FReepers have my position, rather than all in or all out.
*(here’s my list: Thought Bush 1 would beat Clinton; thought Clinton would be impeached & convicted, thought Bush 2 would EASILY beat algore, believed Al Qaeda met in Prague with Iraqi intelligence before 9/11, thought Saddam had WMD, thought the democrats would not take the House in 2006, though democrats would not pass something as stupid as Obamacare, believed the USSC would declare Obamacare unconstitutional, believed heads would roll over Fast & Furious/IRS/Benghazi/Email Server)...
Do I sound naive? Well, no more than most FReepers—at the time. My hopes changed when Trump won, but I’m still pessimistic.
Wow, I just heard about Q two days ago from my brother.
Apparently Q has been accurate and wildly inaccurate. I dunno. I need more research.
Three camps. Believers, non-believers, and agnostics. I’m in the third camp. I’m not saying it’s legit. I’m not denying it’s legit. I’m just along for the ride.
It’s like believing in Santa Claus. Just fun.
“Thank you F&F!
Coincidence?
AT&T>No Such Agency [contract].
AT&T>GOOG/FB/etc. ‘prevent unfair censorship’ PUSH.
Internet Bill of Rights.
Q”
He shows a screenshot from Fox News that shows the text of one of his postings.
I’m in the “believer” camp. Even if Q is a Japanese student group messing with us, some of the things seems to point to high level access. If it were information gained thru hacking, it would have been silenced by now.
Q - whoever that is - has been driving a lot of the message lately.
Many of the outright disbelievers who troll every Q thread are eerily reminiscent of the Cruzbots back in the primary season. Yeah, you Louie.
I do like the idea of the wager. There are a lot of folks here committed to it from both points of view and I think the wager is good way to acknowledge that it really is unknown... A little ribbing both ways is healthy.
Ah heck, I'll pick a side. I am in... I will guess Qanon is real (not a prank) BUT the poster isn't as deeply embedded in the camp as he would imply. Mostly guesses a lot.
My position: At the risk of sounding wishy-washy, I’m leaning agnostic.
Q has been right about a lot. I believe he definitely has some insight and is not just guessing. But the cryptic nature of the messages is a bit off-putting and puzzling. Is the cryptic nature because he’s hedging his bets in case he’s wrong? Or could it be a timing issue? Is he vague because things take time and he can’t really predict how long things will take? No one can foresee every event and every unexpected hurdle, so that might account for a lot of the vagueness, too. He’s giving himself some wiggle room for those unexpected plot twists. Even if he’s a Trump insider, he can’t predict what wacky new thing the democrats/libs/media are going to throw out there.
Possibilities:
1. Q is an excellent student of human nature and is paying attention to the actual facts and extrapolating sensibly.
2. Q is an insider in the Trump administration acting to help the President, but without his knowledge. Trying to pave the way for the public to accept and understand what is going to be revealed in the memos, emails, texts, etc.
3. Same as 2, but with Trump’s knowledge and support.
4. Just a crackpot.
I don’t think it’s 4. #3 would surprise me the least.
I think we’re going to learn a LOT in the State of the Union. I’m stocking up on popcorn!
“Q” is a FALSE PROPHET. I await the coming of “R”, the TRUE ONE.
Unlike previous Republican Presidents, Trump has some savvy political operators on his side.
Hold on, incoming message.