Q Anon: (5/19/18) FRiendly Freeper Collaboration

qanon.pub ^ | 5/19/2018 | FReepers, vanity

[ransomnote]

This thread is a friendly collaborative place for FReepers to analyze information and share opinons. FReepers have a wide variety of reasons for investigating Q Anon content; this is not the appropriate place to criticize or badger those who choose to use some of their time in this manner.

If you are new to Q Anon, the three links below provide overviews to help answer the questions, "Who is Q?" and "Why read Q drops?".

Is Trump Staging a Counter-Coup? [Q explained?]>
Note: The above thread has been locked for disruptive comments, but post #1 includes a strong, concise Who/What/Where overview.

Q Anon: A Freeper's post re the "new Parallel Construct that Trump has created"

First post to “Q” ping list. Please read and let me know if you want off or on it

You can locate Q Anon threads by searching the key word "Qanon" using the search window in the upper right of Free Republic's forum page.

If you haven't seen it yet, President John F. Kennedy's excellent speech regarding secret societies, as well as comments about the press, is located at the following link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zdMbmdFOvTs

A helpful FReeper passed along the following Youtube link to a good source for concise reviewes of Q drops, Praying Medic:
https://www.youtube.com/user/prayingmedic/videos

Praying Medic also has a a Twitter account:
https://anonsw.github.io/qtmerge

Q "drops" (i.e., posts) can be read with their original formatting on various websites. Sometimes the Q drop websites come under cyber attack or stop updating. This week, I've been using the following link:
https://qanon.pub

Q drops (i.e., posts) often use unfamiliar acronyms. Swordmaker maintains a list of acronymsto help FReepers understand Q drop text. The master list of acronyms is stored on Swordmaker's profile page. It's really great to have a convenient place to find definitions and explanations of terms used in the drops. Here is the link:
http://www.freerepublic.com/~swordmaker/index

Within our threads, Swordmaker posts updates featuring the latest terms added to the lexicon - you can find his updates on threads by looking for this silver Q graphic:

SkyPilot has been collecting Q Anon information into one interesting, detailed, "story of Q" post which I'll place here:
https://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3633313/posts?page=163#163

Here's a handy link for those who would like to read what people on Twitter are Tweeting about Q Anon:
Click to read what Tweeters are saying about Q Anon

For those who want a little uplifting video which outlines the big picture that we are now striving for, here's a video from 2016 in which candidate Donald Trump outlines what he wants for Americans and America and his promises if elected.
This Video Will Get Donald Trump Elected

If you'd like to communicate your support for President Trump's efforts to "red-pill" Americans, you may want to use the link Hoosiermama posted which provides you with and email page - you can send the president an email. Here's the link:
Email support for President Trump

[Cletus.D.Yokel]

:: It won’t be long before every person who gets routine blood tests... for general health, or a marriage certificate ... will wind up with their DNA logged. ::

Yes! Right now isn’t that far away, is it?

[bitt]

THANKS I posted that on the non-Q forum..

[blu]

NO, you’re wrong.
“Natural-born citizen

Who is a natural-born citizen? Who, in other words, is a citizen at birth, such that that person can be a President someday?”

[Wneighbor]

ThanQ

Don’t see either of those 2 grandkids needing to worry about this. Just asking to satisfy my own curiosity.

[Cletus.D.Yokel]

OK, def, listen up.

The word used (mistyped) was —limely—, NOT Limey. Look at your keyboard and note the proximity of the ‘k’ and ‘m’. Now, think back to high-school typing class and recall which finger is used to type the letters in question.

In summary...it was a fat-fingered mistake.

[WildHighlander57]

18 was too young,

INS rules at the time of 0’s birth said that for a us citizen mom to convey us citizenship to the child born outside the us, the mom had to have lived in the US for 5 years past the age of 14.

That would be 19, so Stanley Ann was too young (by almost 4 months).

[Wneighbor]

ThanQ blu.

It is off-topic but satisfying my curiosity.

[Cletus.D.Yokel]

:: bifurcated ::

Ain’t that one of them-there “genders” from the SJW alphabet soup bowl?

[Pearls Before Swine]

“Right now isn’t that far away, is it?”

LOL. I thought it was tomorrow, or the day after.

The point is, I don’t know what the government (hospitals, clinics, etc) does with all of the biological materials they test. It used to be that it was only the criminals in some states that had actual DNA tests run.

But since they advertised the use of Ancestry/DNA type sites to catch at least two suspects in the last few weeks, I wonder what they do keep. And, with the generally low (and earned) level of trust in government these days, who knows? And what of what they say can be believed?

[rolling_stone]

....To my knowledge 18 wasn’t too young was it? ...

she did not have enough physical presence in the usa 5 years after age 14

walther mccarren Act 12-24-1952
sec 301 (later liberalized but in effect in 1961)
TITLE III—NATIONALITY AND NATURALIZATION
CHAPTER 1—NATIONALITY AT BIRTH AND BY COLLECTIVE
, NATURALIZATION
NATIONALS AND CITIZENS OF THE UNITED STATES AT BIRTH
SEC. 301. (a) The following shall be nationals and citizens of the
United States at birth:
......
section 7:

(7) a person born outside the geographical limits of the United
States and its outlying possessions of parents one of w’hom is an
alien, and the other a citizen of the United States who, prior to the
birth of such person, was physically present in the United States
‘ or its outlying possessions for a period or periods totaling not less
‘ than ten years, at least five of which were after attaining the age
“ of fourteen years: Provided^ That any periods of honorable service
in the Armed Forces of the United States by such citizen parent
may be included in computing the physical presence requirements
“ of this paragraph...,...

[Jack Black]

But that assumes Obama was born in Kenya. Which seems implausible, given that there was a birth notice in the Hawaii Newspaper at the time. What woman would fly to Kenya in 1960 to have a baby? Ann was in Hawaii in the year before his birth, we know that.

I find it hard to imagine a very young woman leaving her family to go have a baby in a 3rd World Country in 1960.

[bitt]

https://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/3656934/posts

“Brace yourself”...

[AZLiberty]

$4 bills for a pen?

Don't you worry. With the number of them that Trump buys, I'm sure he has negotiated a sweet deal for them. He probably gets them for only $2K.

[Cletus.D.Yokel]

I wouldn’t worry about it.
The game is wide open since Obamugabe.

[txhurl]

Would any of us be surprised if ValJar really did whelp zero!

[Cletus.D.Yokel]

I get that.

MY point was that all healthcare providers and facilities utilize “The Cloud” for patient records. The Cloud ^is^ LifeLog and all that info is available to IC and MI at the click of a mouse.

Much of the information on The Cloud is put there voluntarily...no warrant needed!

[Cletus.D.Yokel]

:: there was a birth notice in the Hawaii Newspaper at the time. ::

BDZ worked that over. The newspapers depended on the family for birth notices, not the hospitals.

[Bigg Red]

Mark

[Swordmaker]

Diplomats are treated differently because of who they are, or what legal station/function they occupy.

When we were researching the state of the law back before this Thomas v. Lynch, which appears to be a mere circuit court decision, the state of Supreme Court decisions was that military service was in furtherance of the service at the behest of national interests and that covered births off shore for all citizenship purposes for military service. It's likely the circuit court is in error for military citizens giving birth on military bases but not for citizens of other nations doing so. Such a decision is also likely only binding on its circuit.

However, the Thomas case may be different in specifics. . . Looking at it, the plaintiff claimed Jamaican citizenship on entry to the US. The claim of US citizenship seems to be an ad hoc claim to avoid deportation. I will be interested in seeing if this ever goes further. I can see the argument that mere birth on a military base is not grounds for granting citizenship as is the idiotic birth within the borders of the US which itself is based on the minority position dicta that got us the anchor baby mess from a Supreme Court decision which the MINORITY lost. In other words, the anchor baby policy is not even based in legitimate case law, arising instead from minority commentary of what the losing side would have liked the law to be.

The actual logic that held that the children of people who were SERVING the national interest of the United States should not be handicapped by being made second class citizens in their political potential is unassailable. Making service to our country more onerous is not in the national interest. Nor does it make any logical sense to claim that because a childs' parents were serving in the military, putting their lives at stake, should somehow abrogates a child's allegiance to the nation for purposes of being elected president. it should, in fact, strengthen that allegiance.

However to extend the illogical, magical ability to bestow citizenship to anyone born on American soil to the soil of an American Military base is completely insane. There I completely agree with the appellate court.

[bagster]

Best rant EVER!!!!!!!

I think I love you, RL.

:)

Bagster

Lesser Oracle