Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Royal Couple in Pictures
Steyn On-line ^ | May 19, 2018 | Mark Steyn

Posted on 05/20/2018 5:45:07 AM PDT by Twotone

Well, today was the big day for Their Royal Highnesses The Duke and Duchess of Sussex, so it seems appropriate to offer a few Royal romances as our Saturday movie date. The most directly relevant movie, Royal Wedding, made in 1947, was set in London against the background of Prince Harry's grandparents' nuptials and starred Fred Astaire and an actress whose dad was an actual guest at the actual real-life wedding - Sarah Churchill, daughter of Winston. But I'll say a few words about that tomorrow night in our Song of the Week department, and today cast our net a little further afield in search of celluloid romances between royals and commoners:

To be honest, when a Prince of the Blood Royal marries in the presence of Oprah Winfrey and George Clooney a half-black American actress who's dated a porn star and divorced her Jewish husband by mailing back the wedding ring and has a violent alcoholic brother who's held a gun to his girlfriend's head and sent his soon-to-be brother-in-law an open letter warning that this will be "the biggest mistake in royal wedding history"... to be honest, it makes even the racier royal romances of yesteryear seem a little tame.

(Excerpt) Read more at steynonline.com ...


TOPICS: History; TV/Movies
KEYWORDS: marksteyn; movies; royals
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-69 next last
To: VanDeKoik
You've got yourself a job. Don't forget the fate of English Bob in Forgiven.
41 posted on 05/20/2018 9:21:31 AM PDT by aspasia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Thank You Rush

No matter how much you dislike mixed race people, to call them a “creature,” says everything about YOU. It’s not a good look.


42 posted on 05/20/2018 9:30:24 AM PDT by leaning conservative (snow coming, school cancelled, yayyyyyyyyy!!!!!!!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Savage Beast
America would have celebrated, from the depths and breadths of her bounteous heart, the marriage of her daughter to the grandson of Queen Elizabeth, had Harry not profoundly insulted her and her people by his reprehensible, disgusting, and inexcusable insult to her President.

hewitt_is_harry_father

Was Harry's father able to attend the wedding?

43 posted on 05/20/2018 9:30:52 AM PDT by Bodleian_Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Twotone

How is Steyn not gay? He is more into old theatre, opera, and movies than any other straight guy. But I love him.


44 posted on 05/20/2018 9:32:49 AM PDT by Yaelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bodleian_Girl

Well, the truth is your dad is who raised you, who was there for you. Sperm donor is not father. (And I don’t know any truth of Harry’s genes, just saying, Prince Charles is his father.)


45 posted on 05/20/2018 9:34:47 AM PDT by Yaelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: BBell

“”Anyone who has ever watched “Prime Minister’s Questions” on c-span can attest to that. I use to love watching Maggie rip those dolts apart.””

I ran across it just once and it was a hoot... Our congressmen and senators have to be much too much PC and would never act the way they do there..That’s not saying our President wouldn’t - HA!

I need to check to see when it is on - does it have a regular schedule?


46 posted on 05/20/2018 10:02:01 AM PDT by Thank You Rush
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Yaelle

Steyn is married with 3 children.


47 posted on 05/20/2018 10:14:09 AM PDT by b9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Bodleian_Girl

That is not true. Please do not spread untrue information.


48 posted on 05/20/2018 10:16:58 AM PDT by Savage Beast (President Trump and His Supporters Are the Resistance! VIVE LA RESISTANCE! KAG!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: leaning conservative

“”No matter how much you dislike mixed race people, to call them a “creature,” says everything about YOU. It’s not a good look.””

Oh! Gee! I’m really going to worry about that. I do think I know myself better than a blank face and what must be a blank brain on a computer monitor.

I don’t care how much they mix and match - I do dislike the arrogance that comes because of the - what word would you prefer - mixing and matching. We had 8 years of it and those 8 years were perilous to our country because of that. The arrogance came with it and tell me it hasn’t spread like a disease across our own country (USA) and others. This country has never seen such outright hatred toward white people as it has since 2009. I wasn’t alone in being removed from it UNTIL that hatred was instigated and encouraged by the person sitting in the office of the president.

You apparently approve that the gushing over the girl Harry was marrying had more to do with her race than what type of person she is, I guess. I wonder how many times the words of MLK, Jr. came to mind during the festivities.

My use of the word “creature” is pretty tame compared to some I’ve seen right here on FR to describe the bride so save your indignation. AND also pretty tame compared to what the bride has called OUR PRESIDENT!


49 posted on 05/20/2018 10:18:31 AM PDT by Thank You Rush
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: kiltie65

I call bullcrap.

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/world/2018/05/16/royal-wedding-how-hard-meghan-markle-become-british/606986002/

Markle has already been granted “leave to remain” in the U.K. as the partner of a British citizen, said a Kensington Palace spokesperson.

The palace said that Markle “went through the normal processes” herself to get her visa.

A ‘”leave to remain” visa means that Markle can stay in the U.K. subject to certain conditions (such as being granted working and welfare rights). The palace did not specify whether any conditions were attached to Markle’s visa.

Garrett thinks Markle may be on a fiancée visa, which requires the holder to marry within six months. That would “also explain the quick turnaround” of the wedding, she said. The pair announced their engagement in November. Reports that they were dating surfaced in October 2016.

Markle must spend five years in the U.K. after her marriage to Harry before she can apply for “indefinite leave to remain,” a visa category that has no restrictions. When she is approved for that, she can then apply for citizenship, Garrett said.

Markle’s tax problems will last longer than her (third) marriage.


50 posted on 05/20/2018 10:19:56 AM PDT by ameribbean expat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Savage Beast; Yaelle

It can’t be said that it’s untrue, or true. Just that it’s unresolved.

At various times Hewitt has claimed that he was. At other times he has denied it.

I do agree with Yaelle though. The person who raised you is your father.

But one would think that a prince who isn’t sure of his parentage would be more cautious about slagging our president.


51 posted on 05/20/2018 10:36:45 AM PDT by Bodleian_Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: Bodleian_Girl

It’s not unresolved. Prince Charles is Harry’s father.

Hewitt didn’t start an affair with Diana until 1986. Harry was born in 1984.

As Hewitt himself said: “When I met Diana, he was already a toddler.”

Harry looks very much like a young Prince Philip in certain photographs. The Spencers have the ‘red hair’gene, of course.


52 posted on 05/20/2018 11:00:16 AM PDT by Savrola
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: Thank You Rush

#1) I believe Obama’s arrogance has nothing to do with having a black parent & a white parent.

#2) I think some gushed over Megan’s mixed race & some hate her because of it. I hope they’re happy like I hope for other married couples.

#3) I was going to say raise your racist flag high, but you’re already doing it well!

#4) I DO agree that Obama set race relations back & seemed to release a lot of hatred towards whites. He opened his mouth when he should have have shut it and kept it closed when he should have spoken. I do not believe it had to do with his mixed race. We’ll never know.


53 posted on 05/20/2018 11:09:41 AM PDT by leaning conservative (snow coming, school cancelled, yayyyyyyyyy!!!!!!!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: Twotone

So what is Megan’s last name now? What is Harry’s last name for that matter?


54 posted on 05/20/2018 11:16:09 AM PDT by Old Yeller (Auto-correct has become my worst enema.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Twotone

This thread is useless without pictures.


55 posted on 05/20/2018 11:18:23 AM PDT by Radix (Natural Born Citizens have Citizen parents)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Old Yeller

Mountbattan-Windsor, but I think if the person is an official ‘His/Her Royal Highness’, no last name is necessary.


56 posted on 05/20/2018 11:25:44 AM PDT by jjotto ("Ya could look it up!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: Ciexyz
He could have found someone like Emma, Viscountess Weymouth, whose mother is English, father Nigerian.
57 posted on 05/20/2018 12:37:45 PM PDT by Cecily
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Yaelle

Steyn has joked in the past about being hit on by a gay rocker (who was not out at the time) because a guy who likes show tunes just HAS to be gay. Too funny!


58 posted on 05/20/2018 1:14:00 PM PDT by Twotone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: b9

I know he is straight. He is at one side of the straight male sexuality curve though.


59 posted on 05/20/2018 3:07:29 PM PDT by Yaelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Twotone

Let’s put it this way. Some really strong masculine hetero guys love show tunes, but it’s only 5% of the strong masculine hetero guys. I don’t care. He can crochet and ballet dance and I still love him.


60 posted on 05/20/2018 3:09:01 PM PDT by Yaelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-69 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson