Posted on 05/22/2018 7:42:20 AM PDT by walford
We took the family to see the new movie, Show Dogs, last week at an advance screening. The premise is great for a kids movie. Max is a talking police dog (voiced by Ludacris) who is paired up with a human partner, Frank (Will Arnett) to infiltrate a prestigious dog show and rescue a kidnapped baby panda. Being a tough dog from New York, Max has no business competing in a dog show but uses his street smarts to outperform the competition to get closer to the inner circle of kidnappers. Along the way, Max learns lessons about trust and the need to accept help from others. The usual hilarity ensues with dog farts, bites on the rear-end, and slap-stick bonks to the head which elicit giggles from the audience. There are also the obligatory jokes that go over the kids head to entertain the parents with plenty of meta jokes that reference the actors work outside of this movie. The keen ear will pick up on the multiple cameos voice performances from the likes of Shaquille O'Neal, Gabriel Iglesias, and RuPaul.
What could have been solely a fun movie for kids that would get my highest recommendation is damaged by a dark and disturbing message hidden, not so subtly between the fluffy dogs and glamorous parties of the show dog lifestyle. As part of any dog show, contestants are judged on their abilities and physical attributes. One part, in particular, is the inspection of the dog's private parts. Being that Max is new to competing, he needs to learn the process so his partner, Frank, along with a former show champion work to get him ready for the final round of the competition. Since the inspection of the private parts will happen in the finals, Frank touches Max’s private parts to get him use to it. Of course, Max doesn’t like it and snaps at Frank for him to stop. Max is then told by the former champion, who has been through the process before, that he needs to go to his “zen place” while it happens so he can get through it. More attempts are made by Frank to touch Max’s private parts, but Max is still having trouble letting it happen and keeps snapping at him.
The day of the finals come and if Max doesn’t let his private parts be touched, he may lose the competition and any hope of finding the kidnapped panda. It all rests on his ability to let someone touch his private parts. The judge’s hands slowly reach behind Max and he goes to his “zen place”. He’s flying through the sky, dancing with his partner, there are fireworks and flowers-everything is great-all while someone is touching his private parts.
During the movie, I kept thinking, “This is wrong, it doesn’t need to be in a kids movie. Everything else in the movie is good fun except for this.” Afterward, my husband mentioned that he picked up on this message too, as did my mother who saw the movie with us. My daughter, on the other hand, said her favorite part of the movie was when Max got his privates touched and the funny reaction he had. I decided to use that moment to help reinforce what we have taught our children since they were little, private parts are just that, private. We talked about how I didn't feel that part needed to be in the movie. We talked about how we never let anyone touch our private parts, what they should do if anyone tries. We reinforced that if anyone tries to touch their private parts or asks them to touch their private parts they should talk to us about that. We talked about different ways children can feel pressured to participate in those types of behaviors. A child predator is usually known to the child, rarely are they a stranger. We talked about bribes or threats, we discussed the fact that that type of behavior is not a game, we reminded them the same rules apply to kids as well as adults. Approximately one-third of offenders are themselves juveniles, with 23% of reported cases of child sexual abuse are perpetrated by individuals under the age of 18 and only 14% of children who suffered sexual abuse were violated by an unknown perpetrator. (Victimsofcrime.org) Although you cannot prepare a child for every situation the more knowledge you give them the stronger their defenses are!
|
|
 |
|
a survivor of child abuse, this is something I feel strongly about and am passionate about helping others protect their children. I also fiercely strive to give my children the knowledge and tools they need to protect themselves. Those little humans are the greatest things in the world! Children are our greatest resource, if they have already been a victim of abuse this movie has the potential to be very triggering for them.
With the #MeToo movement and all the talk of sexual predators in Hollywood, I couldn’t help but think this message, that is blatantly in the open for adults to see, but over a child’s understanding, is meant to groom children to be open to having people touch their privates, even though they don’t want it. It gives them the idea of a “zen place” to go to mentally when they are touched. I'm a make lemonade out of lemons type of girl, so let's take this movie and use it as a great teaching tool. I'm not going to encourage or discourage anyone from seeing this movie, I only want to help parents make an informed decision. I do encourage if you take your kids to have an educational and powerful conversation with them. They will have fun watching Max infiltrate the show dog culture and you will have a teaching opportunity that won't feel awkward or uncomfortable because you are just talking about a movie. Let's take this as an opportunity to build abuse resistant children because they will be smarter than predators, and Hollywood's tricks!
Helpful Resources
Phoenix Children's Hospital Child Abuse Prevention
To Help Or Find Help
My family was invited to see this movie at no cost, all opinions are my own.
So messed up.
And the folks who made this movie know EXACTLY what they are doing. These are not stupid people.
This is horrifying.
“Everything else in the movie is good fun except for this”
Really? Depraved sports star, hideously racist beaner, and flaming sodomite mentioned, but it’s all good fun.
No one who would hire RuPaul for *anything* should be allowed within a thousand miles of a child.
I don’t watch movies or cartoons, but this sounds like histrionic pearl clutching to me. I’d take it more as a metaphor that sometimes you have to endure some really nasty and degrading stuff to get the job done.
Still, I’m sure there are plenty of people who will see, as they always do, some sort of crypto-message in this.
The movie is applauded by the TSA.
Hollywood is a disgusting shithole......................
If you check the breed standards for dog shows, all dogs must be “intact”. You certainly do not want to allow your kids to watch a dog show on TV or in person. This procedure happens at all dog shows. It has nothing to do with child grooming.
File this under “Wrong In Every Possible Way”
Grooming indeed.
There may or may not be an intended message, but after one of the children remarked that her favorite parts of the movie was how one of the characters reacted after having his “privates” touched, the parents felt compelled to take the children aside after having seen the movie to explain to them that “private parts are private” and that children can be pressured or bribed into tolerating inappropriate behavior.
But by all means, criticize the parent for “histrionic pearl clutching” for being concerned about what children are going to take from something on the screen. Given the Cultural War that the Left has been waging for the past two generations, parents are right to be vigilant about what their children are being exposed to — and to warn each other about the latest entertainment product that they might find unhelpful at best.
I really hope you are not a parent. If you don’t understand that they humanize the dogs to connect with young kids, then you may be a little naive.
That does not mean it has to be shown in a movie aimed at young children. Sexual intercourse is how all mammals reproduce, but that doesn't mean a program for children that includes puppies or kittens has to show copulation.
But much more entertaining to see things with an agenda. Conspiracies, ‘dog whistles’, hidden meanings regarding ‘grooming’, good grief, I still can’t figure out if the left or the right is more histrionically paranoid. I guess some folks see hidden meanings in everything from cloud trails, to Scripture, to movies. Whatever.
My own personal experience is that dog shows, and those who participate in them, are just insane.
One of my sisters fell into the whole thing for a while. Her entire life and house revolved around some stupid little fluffy thing.
Highlights:
95% of her social media posts were about the dog. Pictures or mentions of her grade school daughters were far and few between
She bought a vehicle specifically to transport the dog to shows, along with all manner of equipment to groom and house the animal
Before the dog was let out, she had to tie back multiple sections of underbelly fur to prevent the dog from peeing all over itself. Every. Time.
Preparing for a show involved waking up at 4 am to bathe, blowdry, and style the dog. For a show that started at noon.
Worst of all, she didn’t realize how nuts she’d become. She lost friends and alienated family who didn’t by into her insanity, or worse, pointed it out to her.
It finally ended when the dog nipped at one of her girls for no reason, for the second time. My brother-in-law returned the dog to breeder without any discussion.
It would be one thing if the movie depicted how dogs actually are about examining each other’s crotch areas. They are not squeamish at all about that — and do this in front of children. There is no need for parents to explain this so much, because it is clear that they are animals, which do a lot of things humans do not do.
But to have anthropomorphized animals being shown as struggling with having their anal and genital areas being examined and being reassured — and even teased — about their squeamishness is quite another. Art is a depiction of a certain perspective. Hence one must wonder why the creators of this animated film found it necessary to include this.
Whether the writers and directors have any experience with children is hard to say. They may not understand how a child is going to interpret what is being depicted on the screen. Was this movie presented to test-audiences first?
Because more than one adult in this particular screening found this scene noteworthy. If there were any similar comments about it in the test-screenings, did the producers dismiss it as you did or did they get exactly the reaction they wanted — discomfort from the parents and acceptance from the children?
Certainly the entertainment industry is normalizing other questionable behaviors. Meanwhile, how many positive portrayals are there of intact families — with the father and mother who made the children staying together to raise them — depicted in a positive light?
So forgive some of us for being skeptical about a movie that targets children — and openly discussing what sort of effect these depictions they may have on them.
By all means recommend the movie to those with children and have a hearty laugh at the genitalia examinations. But others might want to know what is going on in this movie and, based upon their understanding of how children might interpret this, make a different choice.
Yes, I saw that and others referring to the original, but decided to post the original article.
Yep. May they burn in hell.
Exactly.
Pedos going mainstream and we’re letting it happen.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.