Posted on 08/15/2019 11:24:55 AM PDT by CedarDave
The US Navy is to replace touchscreen controls on destroyers with physical systems in 2020 after a report into the fatal 2017 USS John S McCain collision branded the controls ‘unnecessarily complex’.
The investigation into the accident that resulted in the deaths of 10 sailors said that the complexity of the control system and a lack of training led to the collision.
Bridge design on US naval vessels is largely uncontrolled by the military, with a lack of specific requirements leaving design decisions to shipbuilders.
The step-back in technology will give sailors more tactile feedback and remove the ambiguity and uncertainty that played a role in the collision.
The Navy will retrofit mechanical controls on all DDG-51 (Arleigh Burke) class destroyers that currently use the Northrop Grumman Integrated Bridge and Navigation System (IBNS).
When reached for comment Northrop Grumman told Naval Technology: “We continue to work closely with the Navy on its navigation modernisation program by providing advanced capabilities to support the fleet.”
After incidents with the USS McCain and USS Fitzgerald, the US Navy surveyed the crews of its ships and found a majority of sailors wanted to see a return to more intuitive mechanical controls.
A report from the National Transportation Safety Board concluded that: “Training on the operation of the Integrated Bridge and Navigation System for John S McCain watchstanders was inadequate, because it did not ensure that the crew could perform the basic functions of the watch, such as the transfer of steering and thrust control between bridge stations.”
The report also found that “The design of the John S McCain’s touch-screen steering and thrust control system increased the likelihood of the operator errors that led to the collision.”
The report did not place sole blame on the IBNS, however, adding that the sailors’ lack of training and fatigue also played a key role in the incident.
The incident was caused when sailors attempted to pass control of the throttle from one console to another, resulting in the belief that they had lost control of the ship.
The system on board the ship allows throttle and steering to be controlled from multiple stations on the USS McCain’s bridge. The ship’s crew enabled the “backup manual mode” to get more intuitive control of the ship, however, this meant it could be controlled from multiple stations. As a result crew members on all three stations could steer the ship when they tried to regain control of the vessel steering swapped between the three stations.
As a result, the report recommended that the US Navy “issue permanent guidance directing destroyers equipped with the Integrated Bridge and Navigation System to operate in computer-assisted steering modes, except during an emergency.”
The report added: “Mechanical throttles provide complementary information to an operator: direction, force, and the ability to confirm either visually or by touch whether the throttles are ganged and working in unison.
“Mechanical throttles are used in aviation and on most vessels still operating in the Navy. They are often preferred over touch-screen displays as they provide both immediate and tactile feedback to the operator.”
The report concluded that the US Navy should revise the way it trains sailors to use the IBNS system and provide clearer technical manuals on how to correctly transfer controls between the systems consoles.
I take it to mean that the Navy lays down what controls it wants but doesn’t give much (if any) input into the actual design process. If the exact requirements aren’t laid out in the contract, then you get whatever the contractor gives you.
You should never put critical systems in the hands of a software GUI.
I wonder how much of that touchscreen system was vulnerable to external hacking?
Tell that to the designers of medication dispensing hardware....who use touchscreens to dispense urgent lifesaving medication...bunch o gullible technosuckers.
“After steering watch, AYE!
I have the con.”
“I despise touchscreens.”
So do I. The skin on my fingers to so dry, they are not seen by most touch screens. I have to use a conductive stylus if I want to make a phone call.
I want leather too. Also a saddle horn and stirrups for my boots.
I wonder how much of that touchscreen system was vulnerable to external hacking?
~~~
Well, even if it’s not a touchscreen but it is still software based, then it’s still vulnerable to hacking. However, I believe that the part of the article that I skimmed said they wanted to go back to “mechanical” controls. No way to hack mechanical control unless there is an external or interlocking override.
‘unnecessarily complex’
They want stupid people to be able to operate all the systems of a modern warship. /s
Touch screen technology not always the best. I have a Honda HRV with touch screen controls for the radio. I hate it, you have to take your eyes off the road to change the station or raise or lower the volume. A really dumb idea on an otherwise great vehicle.
I have to use a knuckle on touchscreens. My fingers aren’t effective. It’s very annoying.
Touch screen technology not always the best. I have a Honda HRV with touch screen controls for the radio. I hate it, you have to take your eyes off the road to change the station or raise or lower the volume. A really dumb idea on an otherwise great vehicle.
~~~
I can change volume in 3 places on my car. Knob, steering wheel, and voice command.
However, that’s not a critical system.
My steering wheel is still mechanical. There is no fly by wire here.... yet. lol
If you want it done right stay away from touch screens
I have to use a knuckle on touchscreens. My fingers aren’t effective. It’s very annoying.
~~~
If I encounter touch sceens in public, such as a casino for example, I don’t use my finger tips. Can you guess why?
"Fire one, sir"
Germs? :)
Touchscreen controls work best when you can press “reset” from the couch in mommy’s basement when the game doesn’t go your way and it’s time to start over.
I see implications for Electric Cars
“If I encounter touch sceens in public…”
Have you thought about the buttons in an elevator?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.