Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Inside the mind of one of my very smart pro-vax friends
substack.com ^ | August 22, 2022 | Steve Kirsch

Posted on 09/03/2022 4:43:51 PM PDT by ransomnote

Here's how they think. It's 100% based on deference to authority. If you ask them for data to back up their claims, they stop responding.

 
 
Ask the Expert: Social media's impact on vaccine hesitancy | MSUToday |  Michigan State University

I recently talked to a friend of mine at a recent social event. We’ll call him Bob. He’s super smart about most things. But when it comes to the vaccine, he’s blind to the truth.

He was bragging about how he has been vaxxed 6 times with the COVID vax and he’s perfectly healthy. He can’t wait for SB 866 in California to pass so when his kids turn 12, they can decide to get the vaccine over their mother’s objections.

Bob thinks I’m a nut case, cherry picking data. He says I used to be respected, but after turning anti-vax, people have lost all respect for me. He said I have a religious belief about the vaccine and I’m not driven by data.

What he isn’t telling anyone is that he’s been losing his vision ever since he got his first COVID vaccine. He used to have 20/20 vision, but now he wears glasses and can’t drive at night. When I brought up the data showing the connection between the shots and vision loss, he changed the topic.

I showed him two papers showing the more you vaccinate, the sicker you get (see the two papers here). I asked, “Where are the papers that show the opposite?” He ignored my request.

He gets his belief system from the mainstream media. Full stop. He reasons that if I was correct, surely Bill Gates would agree with me and admit they goofed. It’s 100% deference to authority.

MORE AT LINK: https://stevekirsch.substack.com/p/inside-the-mind-of-one-of-my-very

 



TOPICS: Conspiracy; Health/Medicine; Miscellaneous; Science; Weird Stuff
KEYWORDS: 000noddavaccine; 00jethromathvaxtards; 0copykeywordshills; 0credshotshills; 1nothingthisguysays; 1toomanyfakedrshills; 2iseveraccurate; alwaysoncallshill; cdcshills; covid; covidisover; covidobsession; ddfr; doesiteverystop; embarassinggarbage; fakestack; froctorcrock; gethelp; itneverstops; kirsch; kirschhasmonkeypox; kirschisanut; morekirschnonsense; moveonwithlife; notthisagain; obsessedwithcovid; obsessedwithq; ohnonotagain; pfizerbucks; revisionisthistory; seekhelpnow; spamsomnote; substackbucks; vaccine; vaccines; whyalwaystrolling; whyposthiscrap; whypostthiscrap
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 241 next last
To: Jane Long
Brings back the horrid memories of stories of folks being told to go home, until symptoms worsened.....return via ER....admitted and placed on vent and Remdisivir......family members not allowed in/near...

I lost a longtime, very close friend of mine that way in April 2020. He was like a brother to me. :(

101 posted on 09/03/2022 9:34:15 PM PDT by Allegra
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: erkelly

Again you have made a plain statement. Let’s hear it. Prove I am not. You cannot possibly know so you are a liar on your statement is purely supposition.

If you did know you could not make that statement without being proven the Fundamentally dishonest person you are

You have made a statement you cannot prove and presented ot to me gospel. How can anything else you say be taken to be honest


102 posted on 09/03/2022 9:38:29 PM PDT by gas_dr (Conditions of Socratic debate: Intelligence, Candor, and Good Will. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: grey_whiskers

Ivermectin was used in the earliest stages
I used both zinc and vitamin D as well. Although zinc is more for HCQ
But yes used them all early before monoclonals were available. Once monoclonals were available and accessible, using IVM would be malpractice due to its inferiority


103 posted on 09/03/2022 9:40:50 PM PDT by gas_dr (Conditions of Socratic debate: Intelligence, Candor, and Good Will. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: erkelly

Broward, eh?
Wrong hospital. Wrong region. Thank you for demonstrating your mishandling of the facts. Also you did not provide what I asked roving. The hospital upon which I have personal experience and direct observation. Not only have I reviewed my posts as I lived through the horrors of delta, the hospital that someone asked about I had knowledge of through a colleague and it wasn’t broward

Show me the post. Your memory has failed you and it is proveabke

Calling me a drunk further doubles down on your dishonesty. So, another flare prophet dispatched who cannot back up the plain assertions. Look at the comment history my friend. You are wrong. You have lied. And where is roving to whom I have asked the question. I guess you have to take up for him as he is proven wrong as he cannot back up his claims.


104 posted on 09/03/2022 9:48:18 PM PDT by gas_dr (Conditions of Socratic debate: Intelligence, Candor, and Good Will. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies]

To: gas_dr

Uh-huh. Let me rephrase that.
Not course of the infection as in “stage of the pandemic” but course of the individual infection within each patient you treated.

BTW, you never answered my questions in the last half of

https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/4089955/posts?page=349#349


105 posted on 09/03/2022 9:52:16 PM PDT by grey_whiskers (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]

To: gas_dr


How can anything else you say be taken to be honest

this coming from a known and probably paid vax promoter.

your promotion ad nauseam of what we all recognize as a fraud negates any credibility you may have had.


106 posted on 09/03/2022 9:52:23 PM PDT by 867V309 (Lock Her Up)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies]

To: 867V309

Oh dear. Now you have dug your hole. Your balcony pedal has begun. The word probably paid. You made a definitive statement. Now it’s probably paid.

So let’s ask the question that proves your honesty. You have directly stated I am not a doctor. Are you 100% sure? You stated it definitively with zero wiggle room. When I confront you and others who make the same statement you cannot possibly be sure. So you are lying. You can guess or suppose or assume. But you didn’t say that. You made a clear statement.

You are a liar.


107 posted on 09/03/2022 9:58:04 PM PDT by gas_dr (Conditions of Socratic debate: Intelligence, Candor, and Good Will. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies]

To: politicianslie
"The life insurance companies are ALL paying out record amounts in death benefits."

I work for a large life insurance company, I can confirm that.

108 posted on 09/03/2022 9:59:58 PM PDT by ghost.of.patton (Hollywood is a pedo factory. It's not the scene of a crime, it's their business model.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: gas_dr
Also you did not provide what I asked roving. The hospital upon which I have personal experience and direct observation.

So now you're asking to be 'doxxed'? Make up your mind, you are so confusing, gassie. Dox, don't dox. Ping, don't ping.

What's a poor Bagster to think?


109 posted on 09/03/2022 10:00:02 PM PDT by bagster ("Even bad men love their mamas".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]

To: gas_dr

You are anonymous online with a screen name. Seems a bit of a stretch to call anyone doubting your credentials a liar.


110 posted on 09/03/2022 10:01:20 PM PDT by antceecee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies]

To: 867V309

By the way I offer your post #94 as your definitive statement. You are back pedaling. You are fundamentally dishonest.

It casts doubt on everything else you say. Problem with lying is that it pervades all else you do or say.

And I notice that I called our roving and you and others are rallying to him and yet the person who was asked the question is stunningly silent.

Whatever should we make of that?


111 posted on 09/03/2022 10:02:17 PM PDT by gas_dr (Conditions of Socratic debate: Intelligence, Candor, and Good Will. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies]

To: gas_dr
So let’s ask the question that proves your honesty. You have directly stated I am not a doctor. Are you 100% sure? You stated it definitively with zero wiggle room. When I confront you and others who make the same statement you cannot possibly be sure.

On the other hand, how can anybody be sure that you ARE a doctor. All we have is your anonymous word on the internet. Who could possibly be sure?

#MexicanStandoff


112 posted on 09/03/2022 10:05:03 PM PDT by bagster ("Even bad men love their mamas".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies]

To: gas_dr
So let’s ask the question that proves your honesty. You have directly stated I am not a doctor. Are you 100% sure? You stated it definitively with zero wiggle room. When I confront you and others who make the same statement you cannot possibly be sure.

On the other hand, how can anybody be sure that you ARE a doctor. All we have is your anonymous word on the internet. Who could possibly be sure?

#MexicanStandoff


113 posted on 09/03/2022 10:05:42 PM PDT by bagster ("Even bad men love their mamas".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies]

To: gas_dr


You are a liar.

Oh dear.

you're not a doctor and you're probably being paid to promote a fraudulent "vaccine." prove me wrong.


114 posted on 09/03/2022 10:06:24 PM PDT by 867V309 (Lock Her Up)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies]

To: antceecee

I am not the one who has made definitive statements that are unprovable. I have offered evidence supported positions that even those who disagree with me find me to be honest and tolerant of their thoughts.

So you hide behind this is an anonymous forum. Exactly the point. One can assume what they want. But the definitive statement such as 94 shows the slippery slope of lying and self delusion.

So I am to hear the proof of me lying about being a physician. Let’s have it. Of course I know that proof cannot exist. As it is a lie.

And that’s the point. Multiple people have proclaimed a fact that they cannot prove. This is what is called dishonest.


115 posted on 09/03/2022 10:07:02 PM PDT by gas_dr (Conditions of Socratic debate: Intelligence, Candor, and Good Will. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies]

To: gas_dr
So you hide behind this is an anonymous forum.

Uhhh....

#DontDoxMeBro


116 posted on 09/03/2022 10:10:27 PM PDT by bagster ("Even bad men love their mamas".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 115 | View Replies]

To: bagster

One could make an honest statement as in i sont think you are… but the definitive statement that I am lying means someone is speaking with authority. It is always just to ask for someone to back up their statements or fact.

But nice try bagster. I don’t but the rhetorical device is shifting the conversation when getting your ass kicked

Post 94 states I am not a doctor. It is not up to me to prove that which someone else as said. And as I queried is he sure? How can he know? So when you say something with absolute authority of fact and can’t back it up, it is dishonest.


117 posted on 09/03/2022 10:11:20 PM PDT by gas_dr (Conditions of Socratic debate: Intelligence, Candor, and Good Will. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies]

To: gas_dr

Post your credentials on line, medical school, where you undertook your internship, your residency, what hospital(s) you are affiliated with, what state(s) you are licensed in, lisence #, etc., what your speciality is, are you board certified?

Tell me why you would call yourself “gas_dr” if you are not an anesthesiologist.

Identify yourself or I will continue to believe you are a very disturbed fake.

You can send me this info privately, I’m used to dealing with confidentiality, HIPAA is my middle name — although if you really wanted to be convincing you would stick your neck out. Why not? Jim Robinson does.


118 posted on 09/03/2022 10:12:40 PM PDT by erkelly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies]

To: 867V309

You see the one who made the allegation. One cannot make a statement and then ask for someone else to prove them wrong. It is up to you to let your statement be the truth and when asked to back it up.

So how sure are you that I am not a physician. You said it with authority. Show me the veracity of your statement. Or is it your opinion stated as fact.

You have said something as a fact. Back it up. You know for a fact ir should be easy for your to prove. Also on notice you don’t want to talk about your browsed county statement anymore

Another lie you are hoping goes away


119 posted on 09/03/2022 10:15:23 PM PDT by gas_dr (Conditions of Socratic debate: Intelligence, Candor, and Good Will. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies]

To: gas_dr


It is always just to ask for someone to back up their statements or fact.

EXACTLY

I invite our family of FRiends to examine your and my posting history.

I believe mine to be mostly truthful and yours to be overwhelmingly mendacious, especially regarding the vax.


120 posted on 09/03/2022 10:19:58 PM PDT by 867V309 (Lock Her Up)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 241 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson