3 Damning Equations to Defeat Global Warming Zealots

American Greatness ^ | 12 May, 2023 | Christopher Monckton of Brenchley

[MtnClimber]

These three arguments are simple, but they are strong.

The true economic, social, and political cost of the measures proposed by governments (in the West only) to destroy their nations' businesses and jobs and to impoverish every household is becoming ever more visible. At last, therefore, a few brave souls in the scientific and academic communities are beginning to question what I shall call — with more than a little justification — the Communist Party line on climate change.

Three devastating equations have emerged, each of which calls fundamentally into question the imagined (and imaginary) basis for the economic hara-kiri by which the West is throwing away its gentle and beneficent global hegemony. Power and wealth are passing inexorably from the democracies of the West to the communist-led tyrannies of the East.

However, the three equations stand firmly in the way. It is these three equations — simple enough to be explained here for the general reader, yet devastating enough utterly to destroy the official climate change narrative — that will soon lay low the enemies of prosperity, democracy, and liberty who have, until now, gotten away with undermining the West, no less from within than from without, by their childishly apocalyptic climate change narrative.

The first of these equations was presented to you here a few months ago. Therefore, I shall summarize that discussion briefly. The equation comes in two versions: the wrong version, on the basis of which the climate science establishment felt improperly confident that unabated emissions of carbon dioxide and other harmless greenhouse gases would soon bring about Thermageddon, and the corrected version, which shows that IPCC's predictions of large and dangerous global warming are false and without scientific foundation.

[MtnClimber]

Why, then, do the climate communists advocate wind and solar power and oppose just about everything else? They do so precisely because there is no quicker or more certain way to destroy the economies of the hated West and to end its hegemony than to destroy its energy infrastructure. For that, and not Saving the Planet, is their true objective. What they advocate makes sense when seen in that light and makes no sense otherwise.

[joshua c]

they promise the jetsons
you get the flintstones

[Aevery_Freeman]

That was good.

[T. P. Pole]

Ha! You can’t win an emotional argument with math.

[Dementon]

Unfortunately their emotions don’t care about facts.

[marktwain]

The K revered to in the article is a degree Kelvin, I beleive.

It is not a measure of a thousands.

The positive "feedback" assumption of the climate models has always been questionable.

[BigFreakinToad]

science is only settled if it supports the narrative. Obviously these equations are racist and not woke to make everyone feel better.

[SomeCallMeTim]

The alarmist narrative is falling apart

[sauropod]

.