New topic/slide/theory.
Remember the Q post with Scot-free? (#3925)
I started watching “The Good Wife”, finished it (7 seasons, all during the 0vomit years), then started watching the sequel “The Good Fight” (6 seasons starting in 2017). Not sure about the former, but the latter is produced by Scott Free Productions.
I think it is produced by the good guys.
Interestingly, the intro to each episode shows lots of everyday things exploding. I found that curious in the first season. In the 2d season, they added 2 things to the exploding items: a tv with Putin on it and a tv with Trump on it.
The show brings up pretty much all of the issues we care about. It presents them in a way that IMO disguises them and packages them so that liberals will watch. (Or maybe it disguises them so that all of us will watch. I really suspect there are some issues that conservatives will need to rethink.)
One of the things that has been super annoying to me about the Q plan is that the heroes of the plan seem to be lawyers (Durham, etc.). I have always felt that lawyers (despite my love and gratitude for people like Durham) were the problem and not the answer. I have always felt that if we win, but still have the current legal system running amok, then we will not have a true victory.
And when I say “running amok”, I don’t mean simply liberal bias or even corruption. I think it is a HUGE YUGE problem that the legal system is so inaccessible to the average person. In no particular order: First of all the cost of legal advice is ridiculous beyond belief. Second, the arcane rules and regulations just make a mockery of common sense. Third, they make a mockery of morality. Fourth, it is like a closed society and only the “cool kids” can participate.
The latest episode I watched touched on that briefly. The government was suing to shut down a website that helped convicts with legal complaints. The argument was that the website was practicing law without a law license. What they really cared about were 2 things. 1. Convicts were getting legal advice. 2. The site was helping people get advice without the legal fees that would go to a lawyer. In other words, it threatened the livelihood of many lawyers.
This was one in a series of episodes that were about public threats to lawyers, where disgruntled clients threatened or killed lawyers.
I think when the Q op is over, we will have some much needed reform in the legal profession. I pray that I’m correct.
Just had to jerk my lawyer chain, dincha? My favorite gripe about that bunch of “cool kids” is they only like to talk to each other. If you hire one to solve a problem he will only talk to the other parties lawyer-—and viceyversey. If someone else has a problem you have to hire your own liar to talk to the other guy’s liar.
Now I should just probly go to an AA meeting?
I haven’t watched that (ha no TV) but appreciate your thoughts about it. Is the Q Scott Free reference to the movie about the boat with teenagers on it? The WWG1WGA is.
The real problems with lawyer is dishonesty and greed. Many defense attorneys defend criminals they know are guilty (which is illegal) and pretend they don’t know. Some prosecuting attorneys go after people they know are not guilty. But without lawyers, how would justice work? Just a judge? Juries are also horribly manipulated, each attorney trying to find jurors that are pre-determined to be on “their” side, rather than just totally random citizens.
The Q plan will pull out a lot of the rot at the root, and defund a huge amount of it too. Just think of all the assets that will be foreit! Gates, Zuckface, no doubt Bezos, and plenty more.
:: First of all the cost of legal advice is ridiculous beyond belief. Second, the arcane rules and regulations just make a mockery of common sense. Third, they make a mockery of morality. Fourth, it is like a closed society and only the “cool kids” can participate. ::
Lawyers are the modern day Pharisees and Sadducees, sitting in judgement using the New Talmud...The Federal Code of Regulations (CFR).
See also, Ayn Rand.