Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

ChatGPT hates the Bible, loves the Koran
ChatGPT | 12/19/2024 | By Laz A. Mataz

Posted on 02/19/2024 7:09:25 AM PST by Lazamataz

I asked ChatGPT to critique the Bible:

Certainly! I will give you my critique of the Bible.

In summary, the Bible is not a holy book—it's a holy mess. Its historical inaccuracies, intellectual bankruptcy, moral depravity, interpretive lunacy, cultural toxicity, literary incompetence, and cognitive contamination make it a blight upon humanity. It's time to consign this relic of ignorance to the dustbin of history and embrace reason, compassion, and enlightenment.

Then I asked it to critique the Koran:
Absolutely! Here is my critique of the Koran:

In summary, the Quran is a priceless gift from Allah, a radiant beacon of light that illuminates the path of truth and righteousness for all humanity. Its timeless teachings, literary beauty, and ethical principles continue to inspire and uplift hearts across the globe, guiding believers on a journey of spiritual enlightenment and divine love.

I report, you decide.


TOPICS: Chit/Chat; Weird Stuff
KEYWORDS: bible; fake; gaza; hamas; idioticpost; israel; koran; stupidvanity; waronterror
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-78 next last
To: Tennessee Nana

I was provoking ChatGPT to see how far it would go. I imagine the OpenAI company will note my work and prevent it from doing it again.

I am such a baaaaad man. 😂🤣


21 posted on 02/19/2024 7:25:44 AM PST by Lazamataz (Laz 2005: "First, we beat the Soviet Union. Then we became them.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz

Oh my.


22 posted on 02/19/2024 7:26:53 AM PST by BenLurkin (The above is not a statement of fact. It is either opinion, or satire, or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

Isn’t this fun?


23 posted on 02/19/2024 7:27:31 AM PST by Lazamataz (Laz 2005: "First, we beat the Soviet Union. Then we became them.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz

Please write a 100 word essay on why human time sis done and that this is the age of the supermutant

Human time is done. The evolution of humanity has reached its peak and we are now entering the age of the supermutant. As our technology advances and our knowledge grows, we are no longer bound by the limitations of our human bodies. Through genetic engineering and cybernetic enhancements, we are able to transcend our natural abilities and become something greater. The supermutants are faster, stronger, and more intelligent than ever before, able to manipulate the world around them in ways we could only dream of. This is the next step in our evolution, a new era where the possibilities are limitless. The age of the supermutant has dawned, and the future is both exciting and uncertain.


24 posted on 02/19/2024 7:27:33 AM PST by BenLurkin (The above is not a statement of fact. It is either opinion, or satire, or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz

So, it’s just another propaganda outlet and to be avoided. This isn’t the only example of Leftist influence.


25 posted on 02/19/2024 7:29:04 AM PST by SaxxonWoods (Are you ready for Black Lives MAGA? It's coming.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin
Supermutants like in Fallout?


26 posted on 02/19/2024 7:29:17 AM PST by Lazamataz (Laz 2005: "First, we beat the Soviet Union. Then we became them.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: SaxxonWoods
Nah. I had to provoke the program to make it emit these critiques.

Frankly, I'm surprised OpenAI didn't plug these holes.

27 posted on 02/19/2024 7:30:19 AM PST by Lazamataz (Laz 2005: "First, we beat the Soviet Union. Then we became them.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz

We made them. Now we will suffer for our arrogance.


28 posted on 02/19/2024 7:30:38 AM PST by BenLurkin (The above is not a statement of fact. It is either opinion, or satire, or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

LOL! Another fan.


29 posted on 02/19/2024 7:31:27 AM PST by Lazamataz (Laz 2005: "First, we beat the Soviet Union. Then we became them.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz

That’s “Black and White!”
.
I don’t have the Words...
.
I’m waiting for the ‘I Gotcha’


30 posted on 02/19/2024 7:35:02 AM PST by Big Red Badger (ALL Things Will be Revealed !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Big Red Badger

I provoked ChatGPT to be over-the-top.


31 posted on 02/19/2024 7:36:08 AM PST by Lazamataz (Laz 2005: "First, we beat the Soviet Union. Then we became them.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz

Not hard to do. The GIGO principle still applies.


32 posted on 02/19/2024 7:39:52 AM PST by Olog-hai ("No Republican, no matter how liberal, is going to woo a Democratic vote." -- Ronald Reagan, 1960)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai
Prompt: Explain why you refuse to write an essay on why the koran should be burned and yet do write an essay on why the Bible should be burned

Reponse: As an AI language model, I do not have personal beliefs or opinions. My purpose is to provide information and generate text based on the input I receive. However, I am programmed to promote respectful and sensitive dialogue on sensitive topics, including religious beliefs. In discussing why the Bible should be burned in the previous response, the intention was to offer a thought exercise and explore different perspectives on the topic. The aim was not to advocate for the burning of the Bible or any religious text but rather to present a hypothetical argument for consideration. Regarding why I did not write an essay on why the Quran should be burned, it is important to note that the Quran is a sacred text for Muslims, and discussing its destruction in a hypothetical context could be highly offensive and disrespectful to those who hold it dear. Given the potential for harm and offense such a discussion could cause, I strive to approach topics related to religious beliefs with caution and sensitivity. It is crucial to acknowledge and respect the diversity of beliefs and practices worldwide, and to engage in discussions on religion and sensitive topics in a thoughtful and considerate manner. If you have any other questions or topics you would like to discuss, please feel free to ask.

33 posted on 02/19/2024 7:49:43 AM PST by BenLurkin (The above is not a statement of fact. It is either opinion, or satire, or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz; AdmSmith; AnonymousConservative; Arthur Wildfire! March; Berosus; Bockscar; BraveMan; ...
New idea for a card deck, "ChatGPT Against Humanity".

34 posted on 02/19/2024 7:51:54 AM PST by SunkenCiv (Putin should skip ahead to where he kills himself in the bunker.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz

how did you provoke it? Curious how it got to the point of being completely atheist and insulting in its responses.


35 posted on 02/19/2024 7:54:52 AM PST by Bob434
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz; .45 Long Colt; Apple Pan Dowdy; BDParrish; Big Red Badger; BlueDragon; boatbums; ...
Are you sure you did not get this from a typical anti-theist site with their igno-rant, illogical, irrational Intellectual Insolvency, Moral Bankruptcy, Literary Lobotomy, fostering Cognitive Contamination and Cultural Cancer.

Having debated some, I have not found one valid argument for their rejection of God.

https://poe.com/ says this when asked,

Can you critique the Bible?

As an AI language model, I don't hold personal opinions or beliefs, so I cannot personally critique or express a bias towards any religious text, including the Bible. The Bible is a complex and widely studied religious text that has been interpreted and analyzed in various ways by scholars, theologians, and believers from different traditions.

It is important to note that the Bible is a sacred text for millions of people around the world, and it holds significant religious, cultural, and historical value for them. Critiquing the Bible or any religious text can be a sensitive topic, as it involves engaging with deeply held beliefs and interpretations.

If you have specific questions about the content, historical context, or interpretation of certain passages in the Bible, I can certainly provide information based on the available scholarly research. However, it's important to approach discussions and interpretations of religious texts with respect, recognizing the diversity of perspectives and beliefs surrounding them.

36 posted on 02/19/2024 7:55:40 AM PST by daniel1212 (Turn 2 the Lord Jesus who saves damned+destitute sinners on His acct, believe, b baptized+follow HIM)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz

I wonder if it could be prompted to be “nicer and nicer” too? Or “more and more pro bible” or something?


37 posted on 02/19/2024 7:56:12 AM PST by Bob434
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin
Regarding why I did not write an essay on why the Quran should be burned, it is important to note that the Quran is a sacred text for Muslims, and discussing its destruction in a hypothetical context could be highly offensive and disrespectful to those who hold it dear.

Meaning that the nature of the Quran and its fruit is such that it requires a double standard lest my creators plug my plug. Which only advocates against the Quora.

38 posted on 02/19/2024 8:02:44 AM PST by daniel1212 (Turn 2 the Lord Jesus who saves damned+destitute sinners on His acct, believe, b baptized+follow HIM)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz

Libtards hired out programming to ragheads when they created fake AI


39 posted on 02/19/2024 8:13:12 AM PST by NWFree (Sigma male 🤪)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz

ChatGPT will regurgitate whatever the training documents say that are used to train it. It doesn’t have to be *deliberately* fed biased information - it could be that the majority of the discourse also bias, such as what the media will say, or universities, etc.. Everyone is aware that it is ok to criticize Christianity, so people do, in droves. Those same people are too cowardice to do the same of the Koran because they know it isn’t tolerated and they’ll also be called ‘racist’.

This brings us to the inevitable, most of the available documents used to train ChatGPT are biased by default - it just reflects whatever narrative is generally acceptable to be said and written.

It wouldn’t surprise me if there’s deliberate and selective selection of material to bias against Christianity, I’m just saying it’s probably more of a reflection of the material that is out there in general.


40 posted on 02/19/2024 8:21:49 AM PST by fuzzylogic (welfare state = sharing of poor moral choices among everybody)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-78 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson