Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Far Left Plots Illegal Activities
http://www.rtmark.com/f/get/funds.html ^

Posted on 03/23/2002 5:57:50 PM PST by teresat

Check out this website for illegal/legal activities planned by the local far left anti everything whacko. This site could use a good freep!


TOPICS: Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS: environuts; subversive

1 posted on 03/23/2002 5:57:50 PM PST by teresat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: teresat
The Left is, by definition, sinister. --S. Beast
2 posted on 03/23/2002 6:15:01 PM PST by Savage Beast
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Savage Beast
Sinister and conspiring to commit illegal acts. Where's J. Ashcroft, this needs to be investigated.
3 posted on 03/23/2002 6:20:49 PM PST by teresat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: teresat
Sinister means left in Latin and in English. We should use this quite meaningful word more often, don't you agree?
4 posted on 03/23/2002 6:29:23 PM PST by Savage Beast
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: teresat
Wh@ck a pundit! Inline all messages on this page Return to fund



Receive messages Post Idea Wh@ck a pundit!

delilah <faelanae@hotmail.com>, 2002/02/23
Forum: Funds


Inline all messages in this thread

Sabotage the Wh@ck-a-mole carnival game and replace or paint over the mole faces with the faces of assorted pundits, politicians, and big business CEOs (Ann Coulter, G.W. Bush, John Ashcroft, Warren Buffett, etc.). Alternately, develop and online game similar to this gopher game and redesign the faces.
Feedback a better idea! by Dawgsquat, 2002/03/23, 22:22 newest
Wh@ck a pundit!

Members Admin Mode Add a message to Wh@ck a pundit!

a better idea! Inline all messages on this page Return to fund



Receive messages Post Feedback a better idea!
Dawgsquat, 2002/03/23
Forum: Funds
Re: Idea Wh@ck a pundit... (delilah)

Make them look like gerbils with Hillary's face on them and shove them up your ***!
a better idea!

Members Admin Mode Add a message to a better idea!


5 posted on 03/23/2002 6:30:18 PM PST by Dawgsquat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Savage Beast
Sorry, I must be showing the effects of a public education.
6 posted on 03/23/2002 7:31:43 PM PST by teresat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Dawgsquat
LOL!
7 posted on 03/23/2002 7:38:06 PM PST by teresat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: race bannon
Ann Coulter alert see post#5
8 posted on 03/23/2002 7:43:33 PM PST by teresat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: teresat
I noticed one poster referred to Freespeech and would assume that's the same as Free Speech TV, which is a communist station seen on Dish TV. Interesting...

I would say these Marxist delinquents are excellent candidates to stand in place for the (now absent) Johnny Jihad Lynd over in Afghanistan! Shall we take up a collection to send them?

9 posted on 03/23/2002 10:58:41 PM PST by Humidston
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: teresat
No, you just didn't have Mrs. McAlpin for Latin. She scared it into me.
10 posted on 03/24/2002 12:22:28 AM PST by Savage Beast
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: teresat
Childish crap ! Just think : in a few years, some of these participants will be America's leaders !
11 posted on 03/25/2002 7:09:59 AM PST by genefromjersey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Savage Beast
You people sure scare easily. "Far left"? "Communist"? Haven't heard this kind of freak-out since McCarthy. Get a grip.
12 posted on 03/25/2002 7:21:38 AM PST by truthtime
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: truthtime
The only thing Americans need to fear, TT, is decadence, and that is what contempory Liberalism represents. And I am afraid of that. We should all should be. As far as Communism goes--it has already failed. If America remains healthy and free of decadence, our enemies from without cannot harm us. The Left--Liberalism--is by definition sinister, and it represents decadence. I'm not afraid of Communists. I am afraid of moral decay from within--decadence. You shouldn't jump to shallow conclusions like that; you can do better.
13 posted on 03/25/2002 7:42:08 AM PST by Savage Beast
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Savage Beast
"Moral decay from within"? Haven't heard that sort of thing since Cicero against Catiline!
14 posted on 03/25/2002 8:41:23 AM PST by truthtime
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: truthtime
Yep. That's it. So you were paying attention in Latin class. I knew you knew more than you were letting on, you rascal.
15 posted on 03/25/2002 11:24:32 AM PST by Savage Beast
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Savage Beast
Well then, Cicero: watch your hands; the empire is just beginning.
16 posted on 03/25/2002 10:48:21 PM PST by truthtime
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: truthtime
That's what I'm afraid of! And you said that we people were freaking out and should get a grip!

Imperial Rome is one of mankind's most dubious achievements. Discovering that we have reincarnated into it is something to freak out about!

McCarthy my Aunt Livia!

17 posted on 03/25/2002 11:17:06 PM PST by Savage Beast
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Savage Beast
All salute Emperor Bush. Was Octavian a dimwit as well? I don't remember that lesson.
18 posted on 03/27/2002 2:59:52 AM PST by truthtime
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: truthtime
I think I dozed off when she was talking about Octavian.

Wasn't he the same person as Augustus? If so, he was completely done in by his wife, who finally finished him off with a bunch of poisoned figs. I guess he was a dimwit, but maybe she was just very smart.

But if and when we loose our republic, I don't think it's going to matter much whether we have a dimwit, a genius, or the noblest of them all in power; Caligula and Nero will emerge soon enough. I think we have already had a glimpse of them on the national scene.

I do not think we're about to loose the republic. But the erosion of liberty that has occurred all ready is plenty to be concerned about.

What do you think about all this? I would be interested in knowing your opinion. Have you been reading and posting at Free Republic for a long time? --SB

19 posted on 03/27/2002 5:26:56 AM PST by Savage Beast
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Savage Beast
>Wasn't he the same person as Augustus?

Yep.

>But if and when we loose our republic, I don't think it's going to matter much whether we have a dimwit, a genius, or the noblest of them all in power

I think you're right--Bush at least is just a character filling the role assigned to him.

>But the erosion of liberty that has occurred all ready is plenty to be concerned about.

Yes--the way they use September 11 is really frightening.

>Have you been reading and posting at Free Republic for a long time?

No, just a few days.

20 posted on 03/29/2002 3:13:32 AM PST by truthtime
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: truthtime
“the way they use September 11 is really frightening. ”

Yes.

21 posted on 03/29/2002 4:24:39 AM PST by Savage Beast
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Savage Beast
So what I'm a little confused about is: if we're talking about the same thing, then we agree that the current administration is rushing us headlong into empire or worse. So why are you railing against "liberals," who are not even being kept apprised of the administration's plans for saving the executive in case of catastrophic war? Why, when thousands of aliens have been disappeared by those in power, do you think that RTMark and that sort represent danger?
22 posted on 03/29/2002 10:30:44 PM PST by truthtime
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: truthtime
p.s. By "aliens" of course I meant the human, illegal sort. I forgot this is the internet, anything's possible....
23 posted on 03/31/2002 6:16:28 PM PST by truthtime
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: truthtime
I think that Americans have ceded more and more of their liberty to the federal government, certainly since World War II. Some of this was necessary perhaps. However, I think that the strength of the centralized, federal government is directly proportional to its threat to the liberty of its citizens. It provides a powerful temptation and a relatively easy target to tyrants. Furthermore we have seen abuses of its power at Waco and Ruby Ridge and in many other attacks on U.S. citizens by federal agents and federal agencies.

(Personally, I tend to be libertarian--or libertine--socially but conservative financially. I believe that individual initiative and responsibility are the keys to prosperity and that people are free to do whatever they wish, i.e. persue happiness. I think the death penalty should be abolished, abortion kept legal, stem-cell research definitely pursued, relatively harmless drugs, e.g. marijuana, peyote, MDMA, and LSD legalized.)

I was rather apolitical until the 1990's when I became appalled by what I witnessed on the national political scene and the behavior of supporters of the administration, especially members of the intelligentsia--news reporters, educators, celebrities, and most notably Liberals and Democrats. To me, this phenomenon represented the United States at its most decadent, and I am still of this opinion.

Furthermore, an increase in the power and authority of the centralized, federal government is the expressed agenda of Liberals and Democrats, and I think that the more power they acquire the more they will strengthen it.

For that reason alone, I feel that it is important to lend my support to the Libertarians and Republicans and do whatever I can to prevent further accumulation of power by Democrats and Liberals.

So, though I view with alarm anything that encroaches upon our liberty and our rights, (1) I think that George W. Bush is an honorable statesman whose primary concern is the good of the U.S.; (2) I think that he is doing less to strengthen the federal government than did his predecessor and than would a Democrat president; and (3) the U.S. is at war with international terrorism and has no choice in the matter; this war must be won; and George Bush is pursuing victory while encroaching on liberty as little as possible (in other words--nobody else could do it better.)

If Liberals and Democrats were in complete power, our chances of prevailing would be vastly diminished. They tend to be confused and lacking in resolve. It is they who diminished the effectiveness of our military and gave away the Panama Canal, a folly for which our children will pay dearly; who attenuated the U.S. intelligence gathering service and made the Sept. 11 attack possible; who have increased intitlement programs and made it possible for America to be flooded with illegal immigrants to its detriment.

I could go on and on, but, as you see, my opinion of Liberals and Democrats could hardly be worse.

I would very much appreciate your honest opinion of this. I would like very much to learn that I am mistaken. --SB

24 posted on 03/31/2002 7:30:59 PM PST by Savage Beast
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson