Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Anti Two Towers petition
The One Ring.net ^ | May 2, 2002 | "Pippin Took"

Posted on 05/02/2002 1:54:00 PM PDT by Portnoy

From the Web site:

We have received countless emails letting us know that some misguided person has started an online petition to try to convince Peter Jackson and New Line Cinema that the film of The Two Towers should be renamed in light of the events of September 11. Their reasoning behind the petition is that the title "is clearly meant to refer to the attacks on the World Trade Center," and that PJ & Co. are simply trying to "cash in" on the tragedy. For obvious reasons, not the least of which being that the second installment of The Lord of the Rings was named The Two Towers nearly 50 years before the September 11 attacks, we at TheOneRing.net consider this petition to be rather pointless and ignorant, and judging from the sarcastic and disgusted remarks in the petition itself, so do most of the people who signed it.


TOPICS: Books/Literature; TV/Movies; The Hobbit Hole
KEYWORDS: petition; tolkien; twotowers
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-35 last
To: Lazamataz
Yeah, your title is great, but it has nothing to do with Tolkien so it'll never happen. Feel free to start a thread called that, though. Should be an intersting discussion.... just make sure you ping all the hobbits.
21 posted on 05/04/2002 11:00:08 AM PDT by JenB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Portnoy
Peter Jackson quote on this issue was, "I'm sorry. But if I changed the title, the fans would kill me."
22 posted on 05/04/2002 11:01:21 AM PDT by Paul C. Jesup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The Old Hoosier
Here's how I signed it:

1504. - Spinal Tap --- I got rid of all my amplifiers because they all went up to 11

23 posted on 05/04/2002 11:34:45 AM PDT by uglybiker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: JenB
out of over 1200 signatures, only 67 (half of which are bogus or critical of the petition) are left... hehehehe
24 posted on 05/04/2002 12:24:14 PM PDT by Swordmaker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Swordmaker
Wow, that's amazing. Thanks for updating us on the statistics...
25 posted on 05/04/2002 12:25:06 PM PDT by JenB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Paul C. Jesup
And it would also be a small victory for the terrorists too.
26 posted on 05/05/2002 3:41:51 PM PDT by maquiladora
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: maquiladora;ecurbh
FYI- ecurbh... maybe you would want to ping your list? I pinged mine, unfortunately in the hobbit hole before I remembered this thread was here.

I can't believe Annanova would run with this... 1200 signatures? - did they READ the @$&%(*% signatures? I am furious and I say they need FREEPED... not the petition, but Annanova, for running with such nonsense without mentioning that most of the "1200" signatures are bogus! I have already sent them a note... click the link and then click "Feedback: choose either "Make a comment about a story" or better: "Point out a spelling mistake or factual error.

Online petition vows to ban The Two Towers

An online petition to prevent director Peter Jackson 'naming' the Lord Of The Rings sequel The Two Towers has obtained over 1,200 signatures.

The petition claims the title "is clearly meant to refer to the attacks on the World Trade Centre".

JRR Tolkien wrote The Two Towers in 1954.

The petition header reads: "When I learned that there apparently was to be a sequel, I was overjoyed. However, Peter Jackson has decided to tastelessly name the sequel The Two Towers.

"In this post-September 11 world, it is unforgivable that this should be allowed to happen. The idea is both offensive and morally repugnant.

"Hopefully, when Peter Jackson and, more importantly, New Line Cinema see the number of signatures on this petition, the title will be changed to something a little more sensitive."

However, a note on the petition-online website adds: "The Two Towers is the title of the JRR Tolkien book originally published in 1954, the second book of The Lord Of The Rings trilogy.

"The title was thus established some 47 years prior to the attacks on the World Trade Centre towers, and there is no evidence to suggest that Peter Jackson meant anything by continuing the same title other than faithfulness to the beloved Tolkien classics."

Story filed: 15:45 Wednesday 8th May 2002

I could post a new thread... you think enough folk will see this? Here is my note to Annanova:

I can't believe Annanova would run with this story... 1200 signatures? - did you READ the signatures? Here is a link to the petition, so you can read the signatures this time:

Rename "The Two Towers" to Something Less Offensive Petition

All but about 50 of them are bogus... deleted because they pointed out the obscene stupidity of this silly petition.

So your headline "1200 signatures" is completely false.

27 posted on 05/08/2002 8:14:11 AM PDT by HairOfTheDog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Portnoy
see my last... this story hasnt died yet.
28 posted on 05/08/2002 8:15:02 AM PDT by HairOfTheDog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All;overtaxed;BibChr;ksen;JenB;ecurbh
A victory! - Keep checking the story:

Hi [my name redacted]

Thanks for your interest in Ananova. We've had a closer look at the story you mention and, as a result, it is now being changed to reflect the points you raise.

We really appreciate it when readers take the time to get in touch with us to help us improve our service so thanks again.

Best wishes
Simon Glover
Head of News

29 posted on 05/08/2002 8:58:42 AM PDT by HairOfTheDog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: HairOfTheDog
It looks to me as if maybe it has been changed. Good going!

Dan

30 posted on 05/08/2002 9:05:05 AM PDT by BibChr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: BibChr;all
Yes...

WOO HOO! Look at it now and compare with the above... I say it here, it comes out there... heheheheh

Online petition vows to ban The Two Towers

An online petition is urging director Peter Jackson to abandon plans to 'name' the Lord Of The Rings sequel The Two Towers.

The petition, which says the title "is clearly meant to refer to the attacks on the World Trade Centre", claims to have attracted more than 1,200 signatures.

However, many of the signatures appear to have been declared invalid. Many others do not appear to take the petition seriously.

The Two Towers is the title of the second book of JRR Tolkien's The Lord of the Rings trilogy and was first published in 1954.

The petition header reads: "When I learned that there apparently was to be a sequel, I was overjoyed. However, Peter Jackson has decided to tastelessly name the sequel The Two Towers.

"In this post-September 11 world, it is unforgivable that this should be allowed to happen. The idea is both offensive and morally repugnant.

"Hopefully, when Peter Jackson and, more importantly, New Line Cinema see the number of signatures on this petition, the title will be changed to something a little more sensitive."

However, a note on the petition-online website adds: "The Two Towers is the title of the JRR Tolkien book originally published in 1954, the second book of The Lord Of The Rings trilogy.

"The title was thus established some 47 years prior to the attacks on the World Trade Centre towers, and there is no evidence to suggest that Peter Jackson meant anything by continuing the same title other than faithfulness to the beloved Tolkien classics."

Very wise JimRob's advice is... always quote full articles verbatim so you can see how they change over time.

31 posted on 05/08/2002 9:09:59 AM PDT by HairOfTheDog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: HairOfTheDog;ecurbh;jenb;penny1
How do we start a petition asking New Line and Peter Jackson

to CONTINUE to TURN A DEAF EAR to IDIOTS???

Dan
32 posted on 05/08/2002 9:38:04 AM PDT by BibChr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: BibChr
I'll sign that one!
33 posted on 05/08/2002 10:56:48 AM PDT by Lurking Libertarian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: HairOfTheDog
Thanks, you can put me on that ping list right away!
34 posted on 05/08/2002 11:08:04 AM PDT by maquiladora
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: maquiladora
You got it! - I call this one a victory... even though a bigger victory would have been for them to pull the story. I just hate to see anyone rub raw emotions over something as uneducated and ridiculous as the person that wrote this petition.

There is another thread about it on the news side too...


35 posted on 05/08/2002 11:19:01 AM PDT by HairOfTheDog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-35 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson