Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

"Breaking News", the South Lost the Civil War. Vanity
self | 9/26/02 | tall_tex

Posted on 09/26/2002 6:42:56 PM PDT by tall_tex

I have been watching Ken Burns, "Civil War Series" again. I do not know why I keep watching and holding out hope that this time we might just win.

My sad announcement, is that we did not win, this time either.

Why did we loose, surely we had God on our side.

Why do the good guys continue to loose, Roy and Dale won, the Lone Ranger and Tonto won.

The Clinton's win, the Dash@@786450897, have and are winning still, and again.

I guess good guys finish last, maybe we should not be such good guys.


TOPICS: History
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180 ... 301-318 next last
To: stainlessbanner
Texaggie79's prediction: Sun will rise tomorrow
141 posted on 09/26/2002 9:00:06 PM PDT by Texaggie79
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 138 | View Replies]

To: Texaggie79
"I'm sorry, but that just wasn't bred into me. I can't, for the life of me, fathom having a problem with who my child dates, simply because of the shade of their skin."

I hope you're right. Just don't take anything for granted until you have that babe in your arms. Once that happens life is never the same. BTW, dating is a lot different from marriage.

142 posted on 09/26/2002 9:00:51 PM PDT by groanup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 121 | View Replies]

To: r9etb
where you going so fast? It's just getting fun.....
143 posted on 09/26/2002 9:01:38 PM PDT by Texaggie79
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 133 | View Replies]

To: stainlessbanner
Stainlessbanner's prediction: 500+ thread

I refuse to participate...

144 posted on 09/26/2002 9:02:19 PM PDT by KayEyeDoubleDee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 138 | View Replies]

To: stainlessbanner
Stainlessbanner's prediction: 500+ thread

I refuse to participate...

145 posted on 09/26/2002 9:02:19 PM PDT by KayEyeDoubleDee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 138 | View Replies]

To: stainlessbanner
Stainlessbanner's prediction: 500+ thread

I refuse to participate...

146 posted on 09/26/2002 9:02:20 PM PDT by KayEyeDoubleDee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 138 | View Replies]

To: stainlessbanner
Stainlessbanner's prediction: 500+ thread

I refuse to participate...

147 posted on 09/26/2002 9:02:20 PM PDT by KayEyeDoubleDee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 138 | View Replies]

To: stainlessbanner
Stainlessbanner's prediction: 500+ thread

I refuse to participate...

148 posted on 09/26/2002 9:02:20 PM PDT by KayEyeDoubleDee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 138 | View Replies]

To: stainlessbanner
Stainlessbanner's prediction: 500+ thread

I refuse to participate...

149 posted on 09/26/2002 9:02:21 PM PDT by KayEyeDoubleDee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 138 | View Replies]

To: stainlessbanner
Stainlessbanner's prediction: 500+ thread

I refuse to participate...

150 posted on 09/26/2002 9:02:21 PM PDT by KayEyeDoubleDee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 138 | View Replies]

To: stainlessbanner
Stainlessbanner's prediction: 500+ thread

I refuse to participate...

151 posted on 09/26/2002 9:02:22 PM PDT by KayEyeDoubleDee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 138 | View Replies]

To: stainlessbanner
Stainlessbanner's prediction: 500+ thread

I refuse to participate...

152 posted on 09/26/2002 9:02:22 PM PDT by KayEyeDoubleDee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 138 | View Replies]

To: groanup
indeed, however, I wouldn't have a problem with either.
153 posted on 09/26/2002 9:03:50 PM PDT by Texaggie79
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 142 | View Replies]

To: Texaggie79
"begun in the South, not just begun......"

One two three o'clock rock. Whatever are you talking about?

154 posted on 09/26/2002 9:04:07 PM PDT by groanup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 128 | View Replies]

To: KayEyeDoubleDee
No doubt there is some great footage, good music. Too many folks get caught up in the presentation and accept the production's view as the gospel. I have different views from Burn's on the War, however, I can appreciate the footage and photographs of our ancestors.

Anyone who has stood on one of those battlefields feels the heavy burden of our forefathers.

155 posted on 09/26/2002 9:06:03 PM PDT by stainlessbanner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 139 | View Replies]

To: rdb3
Come join the fun :-P
156 posted on 09/26/2002 9:06:53 PM PDT by Texaggie79
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 154 | View Replies]

To: groanup
Good points, all, and while I think that Abraham Lincoln was the right person at the right time in history, he had flaws as Frederick Douglas notes.

And you're right, slavery wasn't the only reason for the war. But the rift that led to secession had its roots in the preservation of slavery in the states and expansion into the territories (at least so as to avoid a predominance of free states).

Lincoln or no Lincoln, the peculiar institution would have ended sooner or later, and given the predisposition of those who believed that their lifestyle depended upon slave labor not to give it up, the issue was certain to be forced by violence. Just MHO, of course.

157 posted on 09/26/2002 9:07:54 PM PDT by Larry Lucido
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: tall_tex
Maybe you are a little confused. The South was the side that owned slaves and was fighting for EVIL-an evil despised by every decent human being on the planet.

The South were "the bad guys."

The North was fighting against the states that wanted to leave the union because the country had elected an anti-slavery president. Thus, it was the North (not the South) that was on the ant-slavery side. It was the South that wanted to continue a brutal regime that held people in chains and bought and sold them as property, without interference from the North.

Thus, the North were "the good guys."

I hope this helps.
158 posted on 09/26/2002 9:08:10 PM PDT by The Person
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: groanup
Suppose I should have phrased that better. But it's late...and the tropical storm woke me up early this morning banging on the roof and window, awful racket.

Slavery and racial relations in the South are a difficult subject. As a many-generation Southerner (the first of my white ancestors came over from Scotland in the early 1600's to raise tobacco) the whole thing is not overly pleasant to talk about, and it is really not possible to wrap it all up into a neat little generalizing phrase or two. But then, if it were not for the complications of history and its lingering affects on the present, history enthusiasts would not have so much interesting stuff to envelop themselves in.

159 posted on 09/26/2002 9:08:34 PM PDT by Cleburne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 122 | View Replies]

To: Pushi
States' Rights is a broad topic, but I don't believe Southerners wanted a bunch of Damnyankees telling them what to do--period.

But they went to war because they didn't want the Yankees telling them what to do about slavery.

Economics was an important factor.

Yes, probably the most important factor. The Yankees were disgusted by the economics of slavery (a system where production was controlled by slaves, motivated by fear of physical punishment, and not free workers incentivized by the idea of advancement, self improvement, and more money) and the South feared their means of production, slaves, would be freed by the democratic actions of their countrymen.

when you consider the percentage of Southerners who fought in the war who owned slaves, it could not have been the major issue. Why would I, a person who does not own slaves, fight for your right, as a slaveholder, to own slaves?--just doesn't make sense.

They fought because they were invaded and people they knew were killed. They were invaded because their feudal masters seceeded over their desire to hold slaves.

And then, there is always the fact that people just resist change--any change, whatever it is--especially rural, independent people.

Sure. The change they were resisting was the end of slavery.

The sad thing about it is that Lincoln was obsessed. If he had let the South go, it would have eventually rejoined the Union. Also, the southern states would have eventually eliminated slavery on their own. Then we would not have all the animosity we have today.

This isn't even worth discussing. No one has any idea what would have happened. There was no way to avoid horrible war once secesstion occurred. Given simple demographics, there is no way the "South Woulda Won" (except possibly by fighting a purely defensive war, and even then the best they would have acheived would have been a generation's independence, then probably been knocked over by the north, which even without the south would have been the most powerful country in the world by 1890s.)

The war between the states was all about slavery. In the very largest sense, it was about the agricultural age giving way to the industrial age, but slavery was certainly the most important factor in the alienation, separation, and war between north and south.

160 posted on 09/26/2002 9:11:02 PM PDT by motexva
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180 ... 301-318 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson