Skip to comments.
MANIFESTO OF THE WPPFF/WILD TURKEYS/COALITION OF THE SANE
Me.
| 29MARCH05
| Long Cut
Posted on 03/29/2005 8:58:34 AM PST by Long Cut
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140, 141-160, 161-180 ... 5,061-5,062 next last
To: BerthaDee
One side has ice the other side has hamburgers, steaks, roast beef, and deer meat! It's a two door deep freeze!
To: Long Cut
Does this have anything to do with Austin Nichols 101?
142
posted on
03/29/2005 9:42:53 AM PST
by
Osage Orange
(I can explain it to you.....But I can't make you understand it.)
To: ContraryMary
I originally thought it meant
"Wishing Psychiatric Pharmiceuticals For Fanatics" but I was wrong.
143
posted on
03/29/2005 9:43:33 AM PST
by
najida
(I wish I had Tina Turner's legs, Ann Coulter's brains and Paris Hilton's credit cards.)
To: BigSkyFreeper
144
posted on
03/29/2005 9:43:36 AM PST
by
Finger Monkey
(H.R. 25, Fair Tax Act - do the research, contact your legislators, get this puppy passed.)
To: Long Cut
145
posted on
03/29/2005 9:43:53 AM PST
by
Howlin
To: cyncooper
I am *dealing with it*, unlike oh so many others who clamor around in a backroom thread whining incessantly about the need for *protection* from the *insane*, *emotional* right to lifers here on FR.
To: Long Cut; Poohbah
Nevertheless, the message was recieved by its intended target (me), and puts the lie to the claim of wanting a civilized debate.
I claim that the reasoning behind supporting the starvation of Terri Schiavo is the same as the reasoning that supported the T-4 euthanasia program.
No one in this reasonable, civil, sane coalition of yours has even attempted to approach the idea with anything other than an ad hominem attack on me. This should prove to you that your idealistic notion of the folks who want to see Terri Schiavo dead is a fallacy.
147
posted on
03/29/2005 9:44:15 AM PST
by
thoughtomator
(Order "Judges Gone Wild!" Only $19.95 have your credit card handy!)
To: BerthaDee
Weather is nice for a change too!
To: Long Cut
Another charter member of the WPPFF signing in.
149
posted on
03/29/2005 9:44:20 AM PST
by
verity
(A mindset is a terrible thing to waste.)
To: All
It is perhaps inevitable that some will try to trash this thread and start flamewars here to get it pulled. My advice is to simply ignore such posts, unless one responds with a paragraph or passage from the Manifesto ONLY.
Let the flamers bump the thread, but don't feed egos already too fat.
150
posted on
03/29/2005 9:44:23 AM PST
by
Long Cut
(WPPFF Member.)
To: mercy
You'll never convince the Terribots that she has been dead for 15 years. I stopped trying to talk to them two weeks ago.
151
posted on
03/29/2005 9:44:55 AM PST
by
annyokie
(Laissez les bons temps rouler !)
To: .38sw
Nevada here....Good mornin'!
152
posted on
03/29/2005 9:45:05 AM PST
by
the Deejay
( I'LL RESPECT YOUR OPINION....IF YOU'LL RESPECT MINE.....)
To: thoughtomator
like the liberals, you demand only "acceptable means" to discuss the issue, and also like the liberals, this comes down in practice to mean "only those who agree with me are allowed to speak". Yeah, most of the TS threads have devolved into that. Just ask some of the people that have been labelled as 'Death Squad Memebers'.
Agree with us or your not a true conservatrive! Down with that pussy bitch Bush! < /shrill>
153
posted on
03/29/2005 9:45:11 AM PST
by
Bella_Bru
(You're about as funny as a case sensitive search engine.)
To: Long Cut
Proving the thesis of this thread.
To: Long Cut
It is perhaps inevitable that some will try to trash this thread and start flamewars here to get it pulled. My advice is to simply ignore such posts, unless one responds with a paragraph or passage from the Manifesto ONLY. Let the flamers bump the thread, but don't feed egos already too fat.Very good advice. Worthy of a bump.
155
posted on
03/29/2005 9:45:27 AM PST
by
.38sw
To: Kryptonite
156
posted on
03/29/2005 9:45:32 AM PST
by
cyncooper
(I see pod people)
To: BerthaDee
If he fires up the grill, I'll cook!
157
posted on
03/29/2005 9:45:35 AM PST
by
annyokie
(Laissez les bons temps rouler !)
To: thoughtomator; Long Cut
Nevertheless, the message was recieved by its intended target (me), and puts the lie to the claim of wanting a civilized debate.If you've never said something that you wish you could take back the instant the words left your mouth, I congratulate you.
158
posted on
03/29/2005 9:46:02 AM PST
by
Poohbah
(If it's called "collateral damage," how come I can't use it to secure a loan?)
To: Long Cut
Rational discussion bump.
159
posted on
03/29/2005 9:46:06 AM PST
by
malakhi
To: mercy
Opposing the starvation of a human being is inhuman?
If those who wish her dead had the courage of their convictions, they would put a bullet through her head or give a lethal injection. There is no difference between that and starving her, other than the many days she has been spending in a slow, agonizing death.
That, and indifference to that, is inhuman.
160
posted on
03/29/2005 9:46:15 AM PST
by
thoughtomator
(Order "Judges Gone Wild!" Only $19.95 have your credit card handy!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140, 141-160, 161-180 ... 5,061-5,062 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson