Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

'More tar' in cannabis than cigarettes
Herald Sun ^ | 27 March 2006

Posted on 03/26/2006 3:18:10 PM PST by Aussie Dasher

SMOKING three cannabis joints will cause you to inhale the same amount of toxic chemicals as a whole packet of cigarettes, according to research published in France today.

Cannabis smoke contains seven times more tar and carbon monoxide, the French National Consumers' Institute concluded in research published in the April edition of its monthly magazine.

The institute tested regular Marlboro cigarettes alongside 280 specially rolled joints of cannabis leaves and resin in an artificial smoking machine.

The tests examined the content of the smoke for tar and carbon monoxide, as well as for the toxic chemicals nicotine, benzene and toluene.

"Cannabis smoke contains seven times more tar and carbon monoxide than tobacco smoke," the institute's magazine says.

Someone smoking a joint of cannabis resin rolled with tobacco will inhale twice the amount of benzene and three times as much toluene as if they were smoking a regular cigarette, the study says.

Smokers of pure cannabis leaves will also inhale more of these chemicals than from a normal cigarette, though the amount varies depending on the quantities.

"Smoking three joints every day – which is becoming frequent – makes you run the same risks of cancer or cardio-vascular diseases as smoking a packet of cigarettes," the magazine says.

Cannabis is "by far" the most popular illicit drug in France, it says. The number of cigarette smokers and people drinking alcohol fell in 2005, while the number of cannabis users has increased in France in the past five years.


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: cannabis; fatcigarettes; marijhuana; pot; pufflist; smoking; tobacco; wodlist
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 281-300 next last
To: Supernatural
Either you can't spell or you don't know how to use the spellcheck feature.

Or my pothead opponent is running on empty.

41 posted on 03/26/2006 4:16:54 PM PST by Mojave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Mojave
"Oh, but dope toxins are good for you."

Yep. They actually prevent cancer. And people smoking pot drive better, too. And George Washington and Thomas Jefferson grew pot and sat around and smoked it (with the slaves they owned).

These lies make Reefer Madness look like a Discovery Channel documentary.

42 posted on 03/26/2006 4:17:34 PM PST by robertpaulsen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Mojave
Oh, your shortcomings are someone else's fault?

Typical liberal argument.
43 posted on 03/26/2006 4:19:15 PM PST by Supernatural
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Ghost of Philip Marlowe
"I've never seen a cigarette smoker hold the smoke in his lungs until his face turned red."

And I've never seen a cigarette smoker use a pair of tweezers to smoke a cigarette down to the last molecule (where all the good pot toxins are, of course, concentrated).

44 posted on 03/26/2006 4:21:03 PM PST by robertpaulsen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: robertpaulsen
And people smoking pot drive better, too.

After the Supreme Court finds that the FAA is unconstitutional, maybe California should require commercial airline pilots to get loaded before taking off.

45 posted on 03/26/2006 4:22:15 PM PST by Mojave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: robertpaulsen
And I've never seen a cigarette smoker use a pair of tweezers to smoke a cigarette down to the last molecule

Or save roaches to build a new joint out of.

46 posted on 03/26/2006 4:23:56 PM PST by Mojave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: robertpaulsen

I didn't see 8-10 joints underlined there, sport.


47 posted on 03/26/2006 4:24:43 PM PST by stands2reason
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: alicewonders
"Why should that be a problem?"

If legalizing pot for adults resulted in a doubling of teen use, would you still favor legalization?

48 posted on 03/26/2006 4:25:39 PM PST by robertpaulsen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Aussie Dasher

This study proves further that marijuana should be decriminalized, taxed and regulated.

How is a standard prerolled Marlboro Red cigarette a fair comparison to a unfiltered handrolled marijuana cigarette?

Take 20 full strength Drum hand rolled cigarettes without a filters and then compare it to 20 full strength hand rolled marijuana cigarettes without filters.

If marijuana was regulated and taxed:
1. major tobacco would immediately put their decades of growing experience to use to create commercially viable low thc low tar variants of cannabis.
2. major tobacco companies would create new filters specifically for marijuana cigarettes.
3. Tar levels would substantially decrease as a result, and tobacco/marijuana blends would become more popular in the States, similar to street usage in Europe/Japan.


(this post was made out of nostalgia for the old FR WOD threads)


49 posted on 03/26/2006 4:25:46 PM PST by JerseyHighlander
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JerseyHighlander
How is a standard prerolled Marlboro Red cigarette a fair comparison to a unfiltered handrolled marijuana cigarette?

Dopers would use filters?

50 posted on 03/26/2006 4:27:16 PM PST by Mojave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: alicewonders

If your justification for legalization is that people will do drugs at home, but you concede (correctly) that they won't .... well, you lost me there.


51 posted on 03/26/2006 4:30:26 PM PST by robertpaulsen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: robertpaulsen

Do you buy your strawmen by the pallet?


52 posted on 03/26/2006 4:31:01 PM PST by stands2reason
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Supernatural

Pot does wonders for the brain...just look at Charlie Sheen!


53 posted on 03/26/2006 4:35:27 PM PST by Aussie Dasher (The Great Ronald Reagan & John Paul II - Heaven's Dream Team!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Aussie Dasher

Charlie Sheen only abuses pot?

Not alchohol, cocaine, barbituates, heroin, etc?

Just pot?


54 posted on 03/26/2006 4:38:10 PM PST by Supernatural
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: stands2reason

RP gets his strawmen by the barn-load. That way he has an unlimited amount of strawmen to use, which he does all the time.


55 posted on 03/26/2006 4:40:38 PM PST by Supernatural
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: Supernatural
1. Either you can't spell or you don't know how to use the spellcheck feature.

2. Not alchohol

Potheads who live in glass houses...

56 posted on 03/26/2006 4:40:56 PM PST by Mojave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: Mojave
"After the Supreme Court finds that the FAA is unconstitutional, maybe California should require commercial airline pilots to get loaded before taking off."

Now don't get me started with the FAA.

The pro-drug posters on this forum almost have me convinced that the FAA has no constitutional power under the Commerce Clause to regulate purely intrastate flights. Nosy jackbooted busybodies.

I say if you're flying intrastate you take off and land when you damn well please. What's a few thousand lives each year compared to the freedom guaranteed to us by the U.S. Constitution?

57 posted on 03/26/2006 4:41:11 PM PST by robertpaulsen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: stands2reason

Just do the math. The answer is hidden.


58 posted on 03/26/2006 4:42:42 PM PST by robertpaulsen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: robertpaulsen
I concede nothing of the sort. What I said was that there will always be troublemakers that cause problems for the rest of us non-trouble-making population. Just as there are those who insist on drinking & driving - there will always be those that don't act responsibly. For the most part, these people are either; rednecks, gang members or college-age party kids.

I REPEAT my question - what is the problem for those adults who drink/get high/whatever else - responsibly - & don't pose a danger to other people? You say if pot is legalized you know for a fact that twice as many teenagers will smoke it? Could you show me facts on that?

59 posted on 03/26/2006 4:44:00 PM PST by alicewonders
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: stands2reason

Strawmen? Those are actual arguments used by your side.


60 posted on 03/26/2006 4:44:59 PM PST by robertpaulsen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 281-300 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson