Free Republic Purge: Conservative Web Site Bans Giuliani Supporters

NY Observer ^ | Published: May 24, 2007 | by Rebecca Sinderbrand

[Graybeard58]

“Inspector Harry Callahan” stopped commenting before I joined in ‘03. Is it possible that he passed away?

[backhoe]

Thanks for the reminder. I remember that day well, the day you posted. Lest any forget, may they browse through your links... Those times are poignant and graphic reminders that the disruptors of the day were lusting for blood.

Kind regards to you- from the swamps of Georgia.

[Graybeard58]

Add "Texas Flower" to your list. Passed away on my birth day, June 29, 2005.

She was my friend.

[DCPatriot]

Obvious you have an agenda regarding my presence here. I'm not interested in playing in your tag-team bullying.

See ya!

[8mmMauser]

I saw real SS type thugs at Pinellas Park and some wore real jackboots and they guarded Terri so she could be killed without interruption. None of us wore jackboots or jumped in glee like the on-site detractors. Bo Gritz on our side was pretty formidable, though.

[Guenevere]

Questioning your credentials or motives?....

I'm responding to your words!

...the tone of your words

..the way you word your words!

Combative words

..Argumentative words

[finnigan2]

If this article is indeed true, then Mr. Robinson and many anti Guiliani posters here are clearly reserving their support for a candidate with a clear anti gay, anti abortion under-any-circumstances agenda to enter the race.
Since I suspect it will be a long wait, they should signal their intention not to vote at all in 2008 right now because no such serious candidate exists.
As an aside, I find it hard to accept that Mr. Robinson would actively engage in a “purge” of posters expressing pro Guiliani views. To do so would eliminate many conservative posters (and readers) whose views are refreshingly divergent on matters that should be openly debated in a democracy. To actively discourage these different views would result in this web site becoming of interest to only one issue, far right fanatics who agree with each other on everything. What a bore that would be!

[Guenevere]

Thank-you!

[T'wit]

>> I'm not interested in playing in your tag-team bullying.

I simply quoted you. Why do you call that "tag-team bullying"?

[Beagle8U]

I don’t know about all of them but I was here when the one that claimed he started the posse of clowns and saw what he wrote to Jimrob before he was booted.

He is the kind of A$$hole that all the kids wipe boogars on in school. I don’t see how anyone could be near him in person without busting him in the mouth.

[olde north church]

Brits were occupying Northern Ireland. Israel was not occupying Palestine.

You seem to be saying that Irish terrorism is not really terrorism because of the actions of the British. If so, that is an evil and foolish thing to say. Evil because it is never legitimate to deliberately target civilians. Foolish because, of course, the British do not consider their political relationship with Northern Ireland to be one of occupation, and neither does the U.S. (or the U.N. for that matter). You should take your idiotic and evil sectarianism elsewhere. This is not an Irish terrorist supporting site.

Don't misrepresent what I said. It's not EEEVILLLL to point out and obvious difference between situations. The Irish had a reasonable beef with the Brits. The "palestinians" are an Arab strawman.

[Alberta's Child]

Your comment might apply to most GOP candidates, but not to Rudy Giuliani. His well-documented track record is one of hard-core, radical leftism (it’s important to note that I specifically did not say just “liberalism”) on way too many issues for him to be given any credence on a conservative website.

[tiredoflaundry]

place mark

[MrEdd]

Actually, a lot of the names over at DarwinCentral look like the names of some of the losers that were on Clown Posse.

Actually, a lot of the Behavior over at DarwinCentral looks like the Behavior of some of the losers that were on Clown Posse.

[Old_Mil]

You mean this?

[regarding being on a path to civil war]? Out of curiousity, why do you treat such musings with such incredulity? For I suspect it's quite certain that the issues that divide left from right in America today are both more numerous and more serious than those which did in fact spark the first civil war.

On the one hand, you have a group of men and women who want to work, build lives for themselves, raise families, and worship their God in peace.

On the other, a group of men and women who want to build a large, powerful federal bureaucracy with numerous fractured and impoverished client groups, tax the citizenery into indentured servitude, abridge their constitutional rights, ban their religion, and turn their sons and daughters into homosexuals while simultaneously exporting the wealth of the nation to foreign lands and importing their citizens.

Perhaps the only thing that's so surprising is that it hasn't happened yet.

Liberals aren't just different. Liberals are evil.

[MrEdd]

but I like his ability to take down anti-war traitors like Ron Paul and HilaryCare.

Sorry a draft dodger is limited in his abillity to take down other anti-war traitors .

Semper Fidelis

[MrEdd]

There are ten candidates who would be better war leaders than the incumbent.

Draft dodger Rooty isn't one of them.

Semper Fidelis

[Spiff]

The outrageous lies you just said about my feelings on Ronald Reagan are disgusting. He's my hero too. Please don't post to me again if you can't be civil.

You have been anything BUT civil in this thread, so don't even try the civility crap on me. You said what you said about Reagan and it is there for everyone to see. When you claim that Reagan KNEW that the Therapeutic Abortion Act would be abused as badly as it was yet signed it anyway you cast some pretty terrible aspersions upon the greatest President ever to serve. Yet, when called on it, instead of retracting your statement you claim Reagan is your hero and say that the person who caught you is telling an outrageous lie. The tactic you were using, making Reagan look bad by telling lies about him to make a liberal candidate look better, is the same thing that got a number of other FReepers banned. You really need to use your head once in a while and stay clear of that area of debate.

[Spiff]

I'm not interested in playing in your tag-team bullying.

You're the one simultaneously logged in at WA while you're over here calling FReepers "brownshirts" and the "kooky fringe" while disparaging Reagan's record. You're likely over at WA giving high fives while they tell you what else to say over here. That is, if you're even permitted into Salt River. But maybe that's what you're doing over here right now. Trying to earn your admittance to their secret little bitch forum? In the meantime, WE are not interested in your tag-team troll behavior and ask that you start contributing something more than harassment and all the bitching and moaning you've been doing about your liberal buddies getting banned.

You saw fit to post at WA about your planned trip into D.C. to see Rolling Thunder and take some photos. That's the kind of thing we discuss over here, usually. But on FR all we've had from you is more complaints and insults. If you don't plan to contribute to this site and you're only going to pick fights and call us names, maybe its time to part company. As I said before: get with the program, get out of the way, or just get lost. Your choice.

[MrEdd]

NO. Municipalities CANNOT dictate American foreign policy.

Escorting some visiting foreigner to the door when your municipality gets restless over him, especially when that visitor was the one of worlds most wanted terrorists for decades is not in any way foreign policy. Arafat's political position did not make it so.

If the feds wanted him to attend certain events as part of foreign policy they would have made arrangements in advance.

This was an aids infested Arab thug getting showed the door by duly constituted municipal authorities. Good job Rooty, now go join the socialist democrats and quit pretending to be a Republican