Looks to be more real than what Zero put online
Well, the 6 month gap in Ann’s time line may be solved.
Here’s what I got:
Warning - visiting this web site may harm your computer! - the page you are about to visit may be a web forgery!
You can learn more about malware and how to protect yourself at StopBadware.org. This page is very likely to have been designed to trick users into sharing personal or financial information. Entering any personal information on this page may result in identity theft or other fraud.
You can read more about phishing here antiphishing.org.
Or you can continue to http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/blog1/ at your own risk.
You can also turn off safe browsing warnings by going to Google Desktop preferences.
Would you like to help make the web safer by always sending information to Google about sites with suspicious links?
Advisory provided by
So what’s the deal? Hillary’s been sitting on the original? What in the world?
Is this what Farah was hinting at in his tweet?
Orly needs to get this document into the hands of some expert doc examiners to verify its authenticity, I would think.
Maybe she’s already done that. We’ll have to wait to hear the story of how she came by this, chain of custody, etc.
Interesting that the only signature on it is from a deputy registrar.
The document is also called a “Certified Copy of Registration of Birth”. It’s still not a birth certificate.
Notice that there is a reference below to “the Birth Register”, with this entry being recorded in “Book 44B, Page 5733.”
This appears to be a Kenyan version of a COLB. No doctor listed, or attending nurses or physicians, no birth particulars, etc. Very similar to the Hawaiian COLB.
Overall, is as good or better than the jpeg image of the Hawaiian COLB, and the FactCheck photos of the “same”.
I think the revelation of this Kenyan COLB is going to stoke the fire on the bc issue in the coming week.
Why was it signed by the official in 1964?
Could these documents also be posted somewhere other than scribd.com?
OK, you can zoom in on the BC copy. Looks plenty authentic to me. What we have here is a copy of the birth certificate issued in 1964. The original was made in August 9, 1961. So somebody requested the BC in ‘64.
That is a very interesting document.
I’m getting an error message with her site. It reads that her site has been reported as an “attack site” and warns me to leave.
3AM phone call???????? LOL! bookmarked!
I have 3 children born to a Brasilian Mother, each of them have a similar document where we took their US Birth Certificate and REGISTERED IT in Brasil to register their birth there. They have the opportunity to be brasilian citizens if they ever wanted to (among other advantages).
If that is what this is he could be born in the US and registered later.
HOWEVER, if you look closely the Entry date is August 5th, 1961! In that day and age it would have been physically impossible to be in Hawaii on August 4th, 1961 and in Kenya on the 5th to Enter this document on the record. There were no faxes, email, or any other means to do such at that time. Most curious. This document is at least verifiable.
Well, if this is a fake, someone has gone to a lot of trouble to create it, unlike the very sloppy and obviously fake image on the Fight the Smears website.
Isn’t that where the “rumor” of a year or so has indicated where he was born? That sounds familiar to me.