Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Beginning With Vowel Words: E, I, & U

Posted on 01/03/2005 1:42:54 AM PST by indoeuro

The Beginning With Vowel Words: E, I, & U

When it comes down to the downright ignoring of untold stories in America both "sides" and the in between are awfully damned silent. The right, the Republican Party, the religious conservative, the conservative, the neocon, the Bush Administration, the so-called "pro-family", "pro-life", "pro-family unity" groups and organizations -and- the left, the Democratic Party, the the religious liberal, the liberal, the progressive, the "pro-choice", the "womens rights" groups and organizations all, each and every one, are conspicuously silent on an issue none whatsoever wants the American populace to know. The Government itself does not publish figures, they are hidden amongst other figures.

One word begins with the vowel "E". There are two words that begin with vowels that prevent Americans and the World from knowing about "E", those words begin with the vowels "I" and "U". The "U" word and the "I" word or conversely, the "I" word and the "U" word, are those of folks who are consistently at each others throats in America; yet those two words join to silently deny the existence of the "E" word.

Now, "E" is for "EXILE". "I" is for "IMMIGRATION" and watch it now, "U" is for the "UNBORN".

Each and every year hundreds upon hundreds of children, and UNBORN CHILDREN, of "American Citizens" are EXILED, banished, expelled, removed, sent packing from the soil of the United States of America. If a spouse of a United States Citizen has "no criminal charges or convictions" against him or her yet has an "IMMIGRATION" issue, an "IMMIGRATION" glitch, that person will be "removed" (deported is the aged terminology).

In many cases the children, even though they are themselves United States Citizens, are by choice of default taken along on the ride to a foreign nation; in many cases never to return to the United States again. And, in many cases to all corners of the globe, not just Mexico or Canada. In many cases an UNBORN CHILD is "involuntarily" taken for a ride to a new homeland; even though both parents wish the UNBORN CHILD to be born in the United States by reason one parent is a United States Citizen. In many cases the United States Citizen spouse will also by choice of default go along for the ride; and, in many cases never return to the United States again because the removed spouse has been forever banished by the United States Government, even though that spouse has never had a criminal charge or conviction. These folks, these people, these families may as well be, in the name of national insecurity, terrorists, drug smugglers, weapons of mass destruction smugglers, etc, etc, etc.

In this writing I shall concentrate on the "EXILE" of "UNBORN CHILDREN" of United States Citizen parents. Again, the total number of pregnant women and husbands of United States Citizens is unknown, the figures are hidden, but it numbers in the hundreds upon hundreds. There have been several cases that have come to light in the past couple of years yet no one group and no one organization has stood up or with the families against the EXILE of UNBORN CHILDREN of American Citizens. Conservative, centrist, or liberal, all are silent and unwilling to take a stand against the EXILE.

Why is there no care or concern for the families, for the UNBORN CHILD (the foetus, the fetus) with ties to an American Citizen? The answer is plain, it is so very simple. As a whole the so-called "religious right", "pro-family", "pro-life" and other conservative MEDIA, politicians, organizations, groups, and causes do not want to touch the issue of this "EXILE" because they are anti-"IMMIGRANT". On the other hand, and too as a whole, "pro-choice", "womens rights", liberal, and progressive MEDIA, politicians, organizations, groups, and causes do not want to touch the issue of this "EXILE" because "UNBORN CHILD" flies in the face of their Roe-v-Wade stand.

SO, the fear of the giving a very little to "IMMIGRANT" and the fear of giving a very little to an "UNBORN CHILD" prevents anyone from standing up against the involuntary "EXILE"; this when all should be taking it to the streets, taking it to the Congress, taking it to the Oval Office, and foremost, taking it to the people of America.

I thought to let some know this before I say "good-bye America". Some will say “good riddance”, some will say “you are better off”. We think neither statement is valid.

Now, not because of the Viet Nam war, not because of the recent Presidential Election, but because I, an American Citizen, can not allow my Government to EXILE my UNBORN CHILD to a small island nation thirteen hours non-stop from here with my wife who is in at at risk pregnancy without having care and assistance. I can not allow my Government to dump my wife and our UNBORN CHILD onto the roadways of a small island nation that neither has any ties to. I must go, I must take up residency with the follow-on citizenship in that country. I must, because I too am by default EXILED and wish to keep my family intact, renounce my United States citizenship, and owe loyalty and allegiance to a new homeland.

My wife is skilled in nursing. I am very knowledgeable and skilled in governmental infrastructure from local, to state, to the Federal level. I know a whole lot, my wife knows a whole lot. Those whole lots are EXILED with us and will most certainly be transferred to our new homeland. The United States Government should be more concerned about loosing knowledge of nursing and governmental infrastructure than the EXILE of UNBORN CHILDREN of United States Citizens.


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: children; exile; unborn

1 posted on 01/03/2005 1:42:54 AM PST by indoeuro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: indoeuro

Whatever....
snif,snif...

(Smells air...)


2 posted on 01/03/2005 1:47:34 AM PST by moonhawk (Democrats are to "Diversity and Tolerance" as Islam is to "Peace.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: indoeuro

Today's guest Freeper, Louis Farrakhan.


3 posted on 01/03/2005 1:53:18 AM PST by garbanzo (Free people will set the course of history)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: indoeuro
This post was brought to you today by the letter "Z"
4 posted on 01/03/2005 1:54:55 AM PST by expatguy (http://laotze.blogspot.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: moonhawk

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/1304742/posts


sniff, sniff.....


5 posted on 01/03/2005 2:09:07 AM PST by bad company (a conservative bases his politics on his morals,a lib bases his morals on his politics)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: bad company

Okay, Okay, so I can't spell a 5 letter word at 3AM....


6 posted on 01/03/2005 5:32:08 AM PST by moonhawk (Democrats are to "Diversity and Tolerance" as Islam is to "Peace.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: moonhawk

Let me guess. This is from another veteran of the bride by mail frauds?

I hope he can see himself in his child's face. Some of them are already inciente when they show up in the US to marry their "true love".

The women involved are not bad people, just normal people who are desperate for a better life. He may find out that live in a third world backwater was not what she had in mind.


7 posted on 01/03/2005 9:36:20 AM PST by donmeaker (Burn the UN flag publicly.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: donmeaker

ok, my apologies, I didn't get the connection to the prior post.

1. Better to marry than to live in sin. Spank.

2. I think the immigration attorney is a better option than leaving the country. I would be very surprised if leaving the US citizenship would be required to gain residency or a work permit. US embassy folks are really good at helping born and unborn US citizens to navigate the local laws, and normally swing a big bat. What a hoot, to work for a US embassy as you work out your wife's immigration status.


8 posted on 01/03/2005 9:45:04 AM PST by donmeaker (Burn the UN flag publicly.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: indoeuro
a small island nation

Signatory to the UN Declaration of Human Rights?

9 posted on 01/03/2005 9:45:46 AM PST by RightWhale (No dead animals)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: donmeaker; RightWhale

DonMeaker:

I remain with status to return to Federal employment. But, the Embassy? There would be a "conflict of interest" I am sure.

Besides, why would I want to send tax on earned income back to the United States? It could be better used to support my wife and child when born. Besides, after I renounce my United States Citizenship I may then work for the government over there.

And, hey, we've already blown over forth thousand dollars (US$40,000.00) on attorney fees. Just not going to fight it any more. The fight to remain is not worth it. It's just simply shocking to know there are over 375,000 illegal immigrants who have deportation papers and who are on the run within our borders; a very large percentage of these have attached felony criminal convictions from here or from where they crawled from. The number of terrorist sleepers is unknown. But, my Government, rather than chasing the bad guys down, decides to EXILE my UNBORN CHILD. An easy hit I would say, as real cakewalk for those who should be doing the real work of ridding criminals and terror suspects from our Country.

RightWhale:

Yup, that government is signatory to the U. N. Declaration; but, they are not signatory to the Hague Convention in regards to "international child abduction".




You want to know something. My wife is more AMERICAN than fifty-five percent of women in America today. She is from the old school of family values and raising of children. Her older relatives that are here are shocked at what has become of America since the sixties and anything goes liberalism. My wife is PRO-LIFE to the very marrow of her bones. I think part of the problem was in dealing with an immigration judge that recognized her attributes.


10 posted on 01/03/2005 7:09:49 PM PST by indoeuro (,EXILED)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: indoeuro

A lot of small "a" american women don't care for American men seeking American women from other countries. A conspiracy in restraint of trade is what it is!


11 posted on 01/04/2005 11:39:48 AM PST by donmeaker (Burn the UN flag publicly.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson