Skip to comments.
Dan Rather was Forced to Retire
The Conservative Republican ^
| 2004
| Joe Berry
Posted on 01/16/2005 1:39:18 PM PST by theconservativerepublican
Breaking: Sources from a local CBS affiliate tell The Conservative Republican that Dan Rather was actually forced to resign...Stay tuned.
(Excerpt) Read more at theconservativerepublican.com ...
TOPICS: Outdoors; Politics; Reference; Religion; Science; Society
KEYWORDS: cbs; danrather; news; propagandawingofdnc
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-44 next last
To: theconservativerepublican
Breaking: Sources from a local CBS affiliate tell The Conservative Republican that Dan Rather was actually forced to resign...Stay tuned.Do you have some memos typed in Times New Roman to back up this claim?
2
posted on
01/16/2005 1:42:40 PM PST
by
dirtboy
(To make a pearl, you must first irritate an oyster)
To: theconservativerepublican
I'd just as soon see Rather stay.
Getting rid of him only gives the illusion that SeeBS has cleaned up its act and can once again be trusted as a source for news.
The fact of the matter is, SeeBS's bias is systemic. Getting rid of Rather and a few producers will do nothing to change its deceptive ways.
3
posted on
01/16/2005 1:45:15 PM PST
by
Texas Eagle
(If it wasn't for double-standards, Liberals would have no standards at all)
To: theconservativerepublican
Keywords:
TOPICS: Outdoors; Politics; Reference; Religion; Science; Society;
What the heck?
4
posted on
01/16/2005 1:45:40 PM PST
by
dirtboy
(To make a pearl, you must first irritate an oyster)
Comment #5 Removed by Moderator
To: theconservativerepublican
Breaking: Sources from a local CBS affiliate tell The Conservative Republican that Dan Rather was actually forced to resign...Stay tuned.Stay tuned? You just made a major claim. Back it up here on FR.
6
posted on
01/16/2005 1:52:26 PM PST
by
dirtboy
(To make a pearl, you must first irritate an oyster)
To: theconservativerepublican
Are you trying to advertise your own blog? Is that why you excerpted it and put a second link?
Being honest and up front would work much better.
7
posted on
01/16/2005 1:52:33 PM PST
by
bayourod
(The states and cities with large immigrant labor pools are the prosperous ones.)
To: dirtboy
This is not exactly a surprise.
The wording of the report makes it pretty obvious he was forced out.
8
posted on
01/16/2005 1:52:54 PM PST
by
rwfromkansas
("War is an ugly thing, but...the decayed feeling...which thinks nothing worth war, is worse." -Mill)
To: theconservativerepublican
You provide a link to your website ... which has absolutely NO supporting information.
9
posted on
01/16/2005 1:53:18 PM PST
by
dirtboy
(To make a pearl, you must first irritate an oyster)
To: theconservativerepublican
but anyone else would have been out that day.
they wouldn't have let him wait until after the election.
10
posted on
01/16/2005 1:53:46 PM PST
by
ken21
(no offense intended.)
To: rwfromkansas
The wording of the report makes it pretty obvious he was forced out.The poster provides NOTHING to back up the claim. That may suffice for the MSM - but it don't cut it here.
11
posted on
01/16/2005 1:54:40 PM PST
by
dirtboy
(To make a pearl, you must first irritate an oyster)
To: bayourod
Being honest and up front would work much better. He seems to be a Drudge wannabee ... without sources.
12
posted on
01/16/2005 1:55:42 PM PST
by
dirtboy
(To make a pearl, you must first irritate an oyster)
To: Texas Eagle
The fact of the matter is, SeeBS's bias is systemic.Today, they turned over (De)Face the Nation to Ted Kennedy to spew his liberal bile, and refused to allow any Republicans on the show to rebut.
CBS Nixed White House Request to Rebut Kennedy
Sounds "fair and balanced" to me! /sarc
13
posted on
01/16/2005 1:58:00 PM PST
by
snopercod
(Courage is the price that life exacts for granting peace. - Amelia Earhart)
To: snopercod
14
posted on
01/16/2005 1:58:56 PM PST
by
Texas Eagle
(If it wasn't for double-standards, Liberals would have no standards at all)
To: bayourod
Are you trying to advertise your own blog? Is that why you excerpted it and put a second link?If you click on the link, he has no additional supporting information. Which means this claim doesn't pass muster.
15
posted on
01/16/2005 1:59:28 PM PST
by
dirtboy
(To make a pearl, you must first irritate an oyster)
To: dirtboy
Then it's Blog pimping. ( I want it to be true)
16
posted on
01/16/2005 2:02:15 PM PST
by
Drango
(Tag lines must be registered before approval.)
To: Drango
Then it's Blog pimping. ( I want it to be true)This is a worse offense. It's a claim of breaking news ... without the news.
17
posted on
01/16/2005 2:03:18 PM PST
by
dirtboy
(To make a pearl, you must first irritate an oyster)
To: theconservativerepublican
C'mon. We are waiting for you to defend your post.
18
posted on
01/16/2005 2:08:23 PM PST
by
dirtboy
(To make a pearl, you must first irritate an oyster)
To: dirtboy
19
posted on
01/16/2005 2:20:19 PM PST
by
rwfromkansas
("War is an ugly thing, but...the decayed feeling...which thinks nothing worth war, is worse." -Mill)
To: rwfromkansas
It's one thing to plug your opinion on a blog. It's another to say you have a news scoop - and then do nothing to back up the claim.
But hey, maybe this is some dude who was laid off from Debka...
20
posted on
01/16/2005 2:22:06 PM PST
by
dirtboy
(To make a pearl, you must first irritate an oyster)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-44 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson