Posted on 04/11/2006 2:19:17 PM PDT by Millee
"We are not criminals," was constantly intoned at rallies around the country Monday. Thats nonsense.
People who break the law to enter the United States are by definition criminals. Even if, as at the Washington rally televised on C-SPAN, venerated legislators such as Senator Teddy Kennedy say they arent.
Notable was the Massachusetts solon having a translator interpret his words. The crowd shouldnt have expected much fluency from Ted. After all, he was tossed out of Harvard for having another student take a Spanish examination for him.
John Kennedy, president when the story about his brothers peccadillo (transgressions by liberals are often "peccadilloes") was about to break, summoned the reporter to the Oval Office and fruitlessly tried to kill the story. JFK told the newspaper man that the administration was "having more (expletive deleted) trouble with this than the Bay of Pigs." Ah, those golden days of Camelot.
One doesnt have to guess how Teddy Boy would react if the current president similarly attempted to intimidate the press. Hed be blusteringly outraged. It might even be enough to drive him to drink.
Anyway, Teddy administered a quiz of his own Monday. He asked the demonstrators in rapid succession if they had a good job, if they loved their family, if they loved their community, and if they loved America. Amazingly, they knew all the rights answers and reacted by cheering and frenziedly waving American flags.
Admittedly, theyre not the only lawbreakers in the illegal immigrant imbroglio. So are the employers who knowingly hire them and often pay them under the table. Prosecuting those employers might help stanch the invasion.
Many demonstrators are people new to our ways, but theyre quick studies. Realizing that parading Mexican flags and other foreign banners, as they have at previous rallies, isnt smart PR-wise, they switched to Old Glory this week.
Still there are rough edges. For folks who claim they urgently want to be assimilated into the American mainstream, assemblies held almost exclusively in a foreign tongue dont seem consistent.
And a female reverend from the United Church of Christ addressing the crowd appeared to receive more wolf whistles than applause. Washingtons Cardinal McCarrick received a welcome devoid of whistles despite making most of his comments in Spanish. The United States Conference of Catholic Bishops has called for immigration reform that includes "a broad legalization program." Can you say amnesty, boys and girls?
Im not a theologian, as regular readers may have noticed. To this layman, though, the bishops policy conflicts with official teaching as defined by the Catechism of the Catholic Church. The pertinent section states:
"The more prosperous nations are obliged, to the extent they are able (emphasis added), to welcome the foreigner in search of the security and the means of livelihood which he cannot find in his country of origin." Additionally, "Immigrants are obliged to respect with gratitude the material and spiritual heritage of the country that receives them, to obey its laws (emphasis added), and to assist in carrying civic burdens."
I would argue that were at the point of exhaustion in terms of allowing unlimited admission to these shores. First, there are legitimate security concerns. The War on Terror cannot be set aside. If we dont know whos entering, how do we know what their purpose here is?
Then there is the question of our ability to support our uninvited guests. Two years ago one study found that the state of California was paying more than $10 billion a year in education, health care and incarceration costs. A substantial percentage of individuals in jail are here illegally.
Its claimed that America actually makes money from unlawful immigrants because they pay into the tax and Social Security systems. That ignores how many of them are part of the underground economy.
The Catechism also requires immigrants to obey the laws of this country. Coming here illegally flies directly in the face of that.
Once again the bishops seem to have confused Church teaching with their eagerness to be politically correct.
The demonstrations are designed to engender support for those here illegally. My guess is theyre doing exactly the opposite.
We can feel a deep sympathy for the plight of many of the people involved. They are doing what seems to them best for themselves and their families. Its a pity that the countries theyre escaping from, many of which are socialist and corrupt, cant create a sufficiently large job market for industrious workers who have much to offer.
If I were in their circumstances, maybe Id do what they are doing. But that doesnt mean the United States can abdicate its responsibilities to current citizens.
A country that cant control its own borders cant control its destiny. The border with Mexico can be secured, but only if the political will exists.
Over and over were told about how we are a nation of immigrants. Thats true. Legal immigrants, not lawbreakers with a sweeping sense of entitlement who insist our rules be changed to decriminalize them.
That's a great line, Mike. I may be a'stealin that for a tagline. (It will be my undocumented tagline!) ;o)
Another home run by our FRiend!
Thanks!
My guess is that when it comes to booze, Teddy Boy is Equal Opportunity all the way.
Long time no see!
No, he has unlimited money. You aren't going to see The Whale with any PBR or Natty Ice - he's a Chivas man all the way.
Not if you believe him. He testified he was drinking beer - less than one bottle - on the night he took Mary Jo Kopechne for a ride.
If you believe him.
A total Boy Scout is our Teddy.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.