Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Rummy "lied"
The Belmont Club | May 05, 2006 | Richard Fernandez

Posted on 05/05/2006 8:01:16 PM PDT by Cannoneer No. 4

Andrew Sullivan says the man who heckled Rummy was

Not some crazed lefty. The man who demanded that Rumsfeld answer the questions we all want to have answered turns out to be the man who gave former president George H. W. Bush his daily intelligence briefing. And he was right in the exchange; and Rummy was factually wrong. Yep: Rumsfeld lied. Quelle surprise.

No not some crazed lefty. The man was Ray McGovern, who Sweetness and Light noticed was part of Daniel Ellsberg's Truth Telling Project. Here's the relevant blog entry from the Belmont archives:

Sweetness and Light has noticed that the press has quoted two former counterterrorism experts in defense of Mary McCarthy but omitted one interesting detail, which may or may not be relevant. Here's ABC News report quoting the first expert, Ray McGovern to the effect that McCarthy had a higher duty to "defend the constitution".

To supporters, McCarthy is a woman of conviction who exposed actions she believed were against the law.

"This a matter of principle," said Ray McGovern, a former fellow CIA analyst, "where she said my oath, my promise not to reveal secrets is superceded by my oath to defend the constitution of the U.S." ...

Then Sweetness and Light notices that both Ray McGovern and Larry Johnson are associated with Daniel Ellsberg's The Truth-Telling Project. For those who are unfamiliar with the name Daniel Ellsberg, here's the Wikipedia entry.

Daniel Ellsberg (born April 7, 1931) is a former American military analyst who precipitated a national uproar in 1971 when he released the Pentagon Papers, the US military's account of activities during the Vietnam War, to The New York Times. His release of the Pentagon Papers succeeded in substantially eroding public support for the war.

Ray McGovern's role is described on this Truth-Telling Project web page.

The Truth-Telling Coalition, comprised of high-level national security truth-tellers, as well as non-profit whistleblower organizations, provides a personal and legal support network for each other and for government insiders considering becoming truth-tellers. Current coalition members include Sibel Edmonds, Daniel Ellsberg, Frank Grevil, Katharine Gun, Ray McGovern, Coleen Rowley, the Project on Government Oversight, and the ACLU. (Bios and info on members will be available on the Truth-Telling Coalition Website, currently under construction.) To see press coverage of the Truth-Telling Coalition, see the Press Coverage page.

Commentary

Watching the video I fully expected Rummy to be massacred inside of McGovern's kill-zone since McGovern had the ability to choose the very specific ground on which to challenge Rumsfeld. The verbatim transcript of the exchange is below.

QUESTION: So I would like to ask you to be up front with the American people, why did you lie to get us into a war that was not necessary, that has caused these kinds of casualties? why?

RUMSFELD: Well, first of all, I haven’t lied. I did not lie then. Colin Powell didn’t lie. He spent weeks and weeks with the Central Intelligence Agency people and prepared a presentation that I know he believed was accurate, and he presented that to the United Nations. the president spent weeks and weeks with the central intelligence people and he went to the american people and made a presentation. i’m not in the intelligence business. they gave the world their honest opinion. it appears that there were not weapons of mass destruction there.

QUESTION: You said you knew where they were.

RUMSFELD: I did not. I said I knew where suspect sites were and –

QUESTION: You said you knew where they were Tikrit, Baghdad, northeast, south, west of there. Those are your words.

RUMSFELD: My words — my words were that — no, no, wait a minute, wait a minute. Let him stay one second. Just a second.

QUESTION: This is America.

RUMSFELD: You’re getting plenty of play, sir.

QUESTION: I’d just like an honest answer.

RUMSFELD: I’m giving it to you.

QUESTION: Well we’re talking about lies and your allegation there was bulletproof evidence of ties between al Qaeda and Iraq.

RUMSFELD: Zarqawi was in Baghdad during the prewar period. That is a fact.

QUESTION: Zarqawi? He was in the north of Iraq in a place where Saddam Hussein had no rule. That’s also…

RUMSFELD: He was also in Baghdad.

QUESTION: Yes, when he needed to go to the hospital.

Come on, these people aren’t idiots. They know the story.

(PROTESTER INTERRUPTS)

RUMSFELD: Let me give you an example.

It’s easy for you to make a charge, but why do you think that the men and women in uniform every day, when they came out of Kuwait and went into Iraq, put on chemical weapon protective suits? Because they liked the style?

(LAUGHTER)

They honestly believed that there were chemical weapons.

(APPLAUSE)

Saddam Hussein had used chemical weapons on his own people previously. He’d used them on his neighbor (AUDIO GAP) the Iranians, and they believed he had those weapons.

We believed he had those weapons.

QUESTION: That’s what we call a non sequitur. It doesn’t matter what the troops believe; it matters what you believe.

MODERATOR: I think, Mr. Secretary, the debate is over. We have other questions, courtesy to the audience.

The counterfactual which proves Rumsfeld "lied" is this cited exchange from a DOD briefing:

STEPHANOPOULOS: And is it curious to you that given how much control U.S. and coalition forces now have in the country, they haven’t found any weapons of mass destruction?

SEC. RUMSFELD: …We know where they are. They’re in the area around Tikrit and Baghdad and east, west, south and north somewhat.

But the citation is not complete. If you read the full exchange, which took place at a briefing on March 30,2003 it will be abundantly clear Rumsfeld made these statements when neither Tikrit and Baghdad were in Coalition hands. Baghdad fell on April 8, 2003, more than a week after this exchange between Rumsfeld and Stephanopoulos. Tikrit fell even later. The verbatim exchange is given below..

SEC. RUMSFELD: Yeah. Do it. His circumstance is not a happy one. We're within 49 miles of Baghdad. He's being closed on from the north, south, and there's so many people running around hyper-ventilating that things aren't going well. This plan is working.

MR. STEPHANOPOULOS: Finally, weapons of mass destruction. Key goal of the military campaign is finding those weapons of mass destruction. None have been found yet. There was a raid on the Answar Al-Islam Camp up in the north last night. A lot of people expected to find ricin there. None was found. How big of a problem is that? And is it curious to you that given how much control U.S. and coalition forces now have in the country, they haven't found any weapons of mass destruction?

SEC. RUMSFELD: Not at all. If you think -- let me take that, both pieces -- the area in the south and the west and the north that coalition forces control is substantial. It happens not to be the area where weapons of mass destruction were dispersed. We know where they are. They're in the area around Tikrit and Baghdad and east, west, south and north somewhat.

Second, the [audio glitch] facilities, there are dozens of them, it's a large geographic area. It is the -- Answar Al-Islam group has killed a lot of Kurds. They are tough. And our forces are currently in there with the Kurdish forces, cleaning the area out, tracking them down, killing them or capturing them and they will then begin the site exploitation. The idea, from your question, that you can attack that place and exploit it and find out what's there in fifteen minutes.

I would also add, we saw from the air that there were dozens of trucks that went into that facility after the existence of it became public in the press and they moved things out. They dispersed them and took them away. So there may be nothing left. I don't know that. But it's way too soon to know. The exploitation is just starting.

So now if we compare the statements of Ray McGovern and Donald Rumsfeld side by side, here is what we get:

Ray McGovern Donald Rumsfeld
QUESTION: You said you knew where they were. RUMSFELD: I did not. I said I knew where suspect sites were and –
QUESTION: You said you knew where they were Tikrit, Baghdad, northeast, south, west of there. Those are your words. RUMSFELD: My words — my words were that — no, no, wait a minute, wait a minute. Let him stay one second. Just a second.


Ray McGovern had plenty of time to examine the transcript above. It's abundantly clear from the transcript that Rumsfeld had only intelligence indications that the WMD were "in the area around Tikrit and Baghdad and east, west, south and north somewhat". It was clearly a statement of belief that the WMDs would be found there. He also categorically warned Stephanopoulous the WMDs might not be found at all. "I would also add, we saw from the air that there were dozens of trucks that went into that facility after the existence of it became public in the press and they moved things out. They dispersed them and took them away. So there may be nothing left. I don't know that. But it's way too soon to know. The exploitation is just starting."

None of this means the points which Ray McGovern raised were invalid. But it is not obviously the case that Rumsfeld knew for a fact the WMDs would not be found in Tikrit, Baghdad, etc ... and lied about it. Rumsfield may have lied, but the proof is not to be found in the exchange above. What would be more convincing is some kind of document which indicated intelligence believed they would not be found in Tikrit, Baghdad and other suspect places and that Rumsfeld maintained the contrary. But the exchange above actually supports Rumsfeld's assertion that he maintained they were "suspect sites" rather than sites in which he had definite knowledge of their location.  I think the assertion that McGovern "proved" that Rumsfeld lied is simply an assertion. And no, Ray McGovern was not some "crazed lefty". He was the best the Left had to prove that Rumsfeld lied fighting on his chosen ground. And he didn't prove anything.



TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: danielellsberg; dod; elldberg; ellsberg; marymccarthy; mcgovern; raymcgovern; rumsfeld; truthtellingproject; ttp; vips

1 posted on 05/05/2006 8:01:19 PM PDT by Cannoneer No. 4
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Cannoneer No. 4

Enough already!


2 posted on 05/05/2006 8:05:36 PM PDT by ladyinred
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cannoneer No. 4

The retired agent should have explained why the reporting in the Clinton years was about WMDs and al Qaeda/Iraqi cooperation but, after we went into Iraq, Saddam became such a sweetie.


3 posted on 05/05/2006 8:06:05 PM PDT by P-40 (http://www.590klbj.com/forum/index.php?referrerid=1854)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cannoneer No. 4

Rummy bump ... but from the headline I thought we'd hear about Patches' veracity.


4 posted on 05/05/2006 8:07:01 PM PDT by NonValueAdded ("Too soon to remember??? How about TOO SOON TO FORGET!" from Mr. Silverback)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cannoneer No. 4

Isn't it kind of oxymoronic for an intelligence analyst (provider) to criticize the intelligence Rummy used???


5 posted on 05/05/2006 8:07:14 PM PDT by E=MC<sup>2</sup> (Are liberals born stupid, or do they have to work at it???)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cannoneer No. 4

Why are you bringing this up?


6 posted on 05/05/2006 8:07:17 PM PDT by bnelson44 (Proud parent of a tanker! (Charlie Mike, son))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cannoneer No. 4

I thought Rummy handled himself well in that exchange.


7 posted on 05/05/2006 8:07:50 PM PDT by NutCrackerBoy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cannoneer No. 4

McGovern IS a crazed lefty.


8 posted on 05/05/2006 8:08:18 PM PDT by sinkspur ( I didn't know until just now that it was Barzini all along.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: edweena

ping


9 posted on 05/05/2006 8:11:31 PM PDT by listenhillary (The original Contract with America - The U.S. Constitution)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cannoneer No. 4

Belmont Club is the only blog that I read. It deserves a ping list.


10 posted on 05/05/2006 8:11:54 PM PDT by SteveMcKing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cannoneer No. 4

The left shows its idiocy once again.

Is there a cure for BDS?


11 posted on 05/05/2006 8:16:40 PM PDT by roses of sharon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cannoneer No. 4

We all make decisions based on our senses. When our senses are wrong that does not make us liars. And reacting to those senses does not make us wrong.

All of the 'senses' of the US, and our allies(and non-allies) had been indicating, for many years, that we made the right decision. End of story


12 posted on 05/05/2006 8:19:11 PM PDT by Spruce (Keep your mitts off my wallet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cannoneer No. 4

All this clown did was repeat the talking points and continue the news cycle.


13 posted on 05/05/2006 8:26:08 PM PDT by satchmodog9 (Most people stand on the tracks and never even hear the train coming)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: satchmodog9; All

Full circle!

Months ago, a very liberal, absurdly Bush hating Democrat person I know, told me that a CIA employee he knows (name not given to me), who helped write the Daily Intel Briefings for the President was totally against the President and Iraq because as a careerist he did not like what the Commander in Chief was saying and doing.

Could it possibly be this man? If so I wonder how reliable any information the CIA was offering could be when such mind sets were potentially slanting according to their own emotions with the intent of hurting Bush.


14 posted on 05/05/2006 8:54:56 PM PDT by FARS (OK)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Cannoneer No. 4
Ray McGovern is the spokesperson for a group of crazies called, amusingly enough, the "Veteran Intelligence Professionals for Sanity," or VIPS for short.

VIPS' initial target was Dick Cheney.

VIPS' had about 25 members early on.

[Others member of VIPS are Larry Johnson and Patrick Eddington, author of a book called "Gassed in the Gulf." Yet another is William Christison, who is a backer of a group called "Urgent Call." Other people associated with Urgent Call are Pol Pot apologist Noam Chomsky, Barbara Kingsolver, Julian Bond, and Jonathan Schell.]

Both VIPS and Ray McGovern had email accounts on the web domain of a group called "counterpunch.org."

Counterpunch.org is run by Alexander Cockburn, a columnist for the leftwing rag "The Nation."

VIPS spokesman Ray McGovern is an associate of former US ambassador Joseph Wilson, who is the husband of the allegedly "outed" CIA employee Valerie Plame.

15 posted on 05/05/2006 9:29:31 PM PDT by piasa (Attitude Adjustments Offered Here Free of Charge)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cannoneer No. 4

Crazed Lefty:

"QUESTION: Well we’re talking about lies and your allegation there was bulletproof evidence of ties between al Qaeda and Iraq."

The Left keeps lying about the lack of links when in fact more and more evidence comes out of clear links between Saddam and Al Qaeda over a number of years, from the early 1990s onwards to 2003.



16 posted on 05/05/2006 9:37:20 PM PDT by WOSG (Faith & Reason)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bnelson44

Why not?


17 posted on 05/06/2006 2:50:46 AM PDT by Cannoneer No. 4 (Civilian Irregular Information Defense Group http://cannoneerno4.wordpress.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: piasa

Good stuff. Thanks.


18 posted on 05/06/2006 2:56:47 AM PDT by Cannoneer No. 4 (Civilian Irregular Information Defense Group http://cannoneerno4.wordpress.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: WOSG
www.9-11commission.gov
Page 128

The original sealed indictment had added that al Qaeda had “reached an understanding with the government of Iraq that al Qaeda would not work against that government and that on particular projects, specifically including weapons development, al Qaeda would work cooperatively with the Government of Iraq.”109This passage led Clarke, who for years had read intelligence reports on Iraqi-Sudanese cooperation on chemical weapons, to speculate to Berger that a large Iraqi presence at chemical facilities in Khartoum was “probably a direct result of the Iraq–Al Qida agreement.” Clarke added that VX precursor traces found near al Shifa were the “exact formula used by Iraq.”110This language about al Qaeda’s “understanding” with Iraq had been dropped, however, when a superseding indictment was filed in November 1998.111
19 posted on 05/06/2006 10:16:27 AM PDT by P-40 (http://www.590klbj.com/forum/index.php?referrerid=1854)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson