Posted on 08/26/2006 8:02:05 AM PDT by grandpa jones
"The Kyoto initiatives to save the planet from the greenhouse effect should be put off until better times," he said. "The global temperature maximum has been reached on Earth, and Earth's global temperature will decline to a climatic minimum even without the Kyoto protocol."
Algore is not going to like this.
Read more: "Russian Scientist Predicts Global Cooling" h/t Mike C.
(Excerpt) Read more at nukegingrich.blogspot.com ...
Here's the actual article.
http://www.upi.com/NewsTrack/view.php?StoryID=20060825-091321-7556r
"Al Gore is not going to like this"
LOL!
Uh duh, the sun spot cycle has peaked an we are enterning a period of reduced solar activitiy. Like this took a lot of brains to figure out.
"Like this took a lot of brains to figure out."
We ARE talking about the KYOTO bunch, after all.
Brains doesn't really have anything to do with it.
MONEY and an AGENDA do!!
(but you knew that) ';)
You are correct Sir or Ma'am. It can NEVER be said enough. This is NOT Science, it is Politics.
As on the other thread: Between Global Warming and Global Cooling is what? Global Saming?
well I've been thinking about buying a motorhome with a big honking 9mpg gas V8
this may be my chance to save humanity from freezing to death..........
SAVE the EARTH!
It's the only planet with Chocolate!
Eventually they will be right. The cycles have been consistant.
"SAVE the EARTH!
It's the only planet with Chocolate!"
LOL!
Uh, not quite. Last sunspot high was 2000, so we are in the middle/tail end of the ebb. Newest info shows that maybe the next sunspot cycle, number 24, will be larger than the last one by 30-50%:
From National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCAR)--
Scientists Issue Unprecedented Forecast of Next Sunspot CycleMarch 6, 2006
BOULDERThe next sunspot cycle will be 30-50% stronger than the last one and begin as much as a year late, according to a breakthrough forecast using a computer model of solar dynamics developed by scientists at the National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCAR). Predicting the Sun's cycles accurately, years in advance, will help societies plan for active bouts of solar storms, which can slow satellite orbits, disrupt communications, and bring down power systems.
The scientists have confidence in the forecast because, in a series of test runs, the newly developed model simulated the strength of the past eight solar cycles with more than 98% accuracy. The forecasts are generated, in part, by tracking the subsurface movements of the sunspot remnants of the previous two solar cycles. The team is publishing its forecast in the current issue of Geophysical Research Letters.
...
Predicting Cycles 24 and 25
The Predictive Flux-transport Dynamo Model is enabling NCAR scientists to predict that the next solar cycle, known as Cycle 24, will produce sunspots across an area slightly larger than 2.5% of the visible surface of the Sun. The scientists expect the cycle to begin in late 2007 or early 2008, which is about 6 to 12 months later than a cycle would normally start. Cycle 24 is likely to reach its peak about 2012.
By analyzing recent solar cycles, the scientists also hope to forecast sunspot activity two solar cycles, or 22 years, into the future. The NCAR team is planning in the next year to issue a forecast of Cycle 25, which will peak in the early 2020s.

So who ya gonna believe?? Russky scientists, Merican scientists, or AlBore?? Decisions, decisions...
Thanks! Got to love Freepers. Always someone with the up to date word.
Hey, give me a few minutes more and I'm sure I can come up with a whole lot more conflicting sources.
Well, the data may be reasonable, but the "interpretations" and "emanations of the penumbras" will always change and be different. Glad I learned many, many years ago how to read... scientific papers and other stuff... and I can usually see through the PC, BS smokescreens of the "spin" doctors and evaluate the data myself.
Unfortunately, 1/2 the population, by statistical proof, are morons and there's not much you can do 'bout that.
Hehehehe, ever notice that the percentage of moron population [sub-100 IQ] is pretty close to the distribution of liberals and liberal voting patterns. Makes ya go "hmmmmmmmmmmm", doesn't it?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.