Posted on 10/12/2006, 5:54:18 PM by Philistone
Now that the Enviro-Nazis have come out and clearly stated that anyone who denies global warming will be tried for "crimes against humanity", I want to clearly state for the future record that I'm not a "global warming denier." I love trees. And your little dog too. The globe will warm. The heavens will rend. There will be wailing and gnashing of teeth. Against all physical laws, gigantic ice-wielding hurricanes will devour Manhatten. In short, WE ARE ALL GOING TO DIE!
Now that I have saved myself from future prosecution, I still want to ask "So what? What are we supposed to do about it?" I would like to present for your intellectual pleasure, the ultimate anti-global warming argument. The advantage to this argument is that all it requires is a pen, a cocktail napkin and an Earth First knot-hole surfer to act as foil. What is truly great about the argument is that your tree-hugging friend will agree with everything you say right up until you reach the conclusion, at which point he will begin to do the flopping flounder - mouth opening and closing with no sound coming out as he attempts to refute it. Trust me, it's more fun than a barrel full of crystal rubbers or pyramid wearers.
(Excerpt) Read more at politicallyincorrect46.blogspot.com ...
Very good indeed.
Good catch.
Too bad it's in the Blogs section and therefore will be unread by most Freepers.
I tried posting it under news/activism, but because it's hosted at blogspot.com I got relegated to here...
I find it interesting that the political left is pushing this agenda rather than the scientists. I would like to see some empiracal evidence but all I see is hot air from geniuses like AlGore.
Well done.
But, what is a knot-hole surfer?
Uhm... play on words...
There was a band in the 90s called the "B*tt Hole Surfers"...
Creative license, I guess...
I especially liked the piece on Liberalism and Narcissistic Personality Disorder. It fits the likes of Cindy Sheehan to a T.
This, of course, is what will trip up the GM - IF he agrees with it. If he doesn't, there's no point in going on.
How many tree-huggers in fact WON'T agree with this premise, that in fact ALL global warming is man's fault? This feller may be a bit too optimistic.
Well at that point, at least you know it's not worth the effort of going on. If someone is unwilling to admit that climate changes occurred before man was around and at least theoretically could be occuring now, you might as well just shoot him...
You do good work.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.