Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

RNC Chief Ken Mehlman accepted political contributions from gay porn king?
talkingpointsmemo.com ^ | 10-28-06 | Joshua Micah Marshall

Posted on 10/29/2006 2:41:00 AM PST by WestVirginiaRebel

RNC CHIEF KEN Mehlman accepted political contributions from gay porn king?

Last week, you'll remember, the RNC, headed by Ken Mehlman, was running that race-baiting 'bimbo' ad against Rep. Harold Ford (D) down in Tennessee. One of the barbs in that ad was the claim that Ford had taken political contributions from "porn movie producers."

But it seems there is plenty of porn movie producer money to go around.

It turns out that the Republican National Committee is a regular recpient of political contributions from Nicholas T. Boyas, the owner and CEO of Marina Pacific Distributers, one of the largest producers and distributers of gay porn in the United States.

(Excerpt) Read more at talkingpointsmemo.com ...


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: dummietroll; elections; hypocracy; leftistblogger; republicans
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-64 next last
To: mewzilla
From the below goole link, it shows a nicholas boyias, of Marine Pacific distibutors of North Hollywood, CA, gave Phil Angelides $1,000.

Link

While on campaignmoney.com a Nicholas Boyias from Chatsworth, CA(about 20 miles west of North Hollywood, CA,) gave about $1,000 total to the national and California RNC.

Link

So this can be a case of two different nicholas boyias, giving to 2 different campaigns.

41 posted on 10/29/2006 4:15:48 AM PST by Dane ("Mr. Gorbachev, tear down this wall" Ronald Reagan, 1987)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: A.Hun

Well, to be fair, it might not (just) be the FEC. Could be the author of this article. I googled Boyias and got more hits (most of which I did NOT want to check out if you get my drift) than I got with the spelling the author of the above article uses. I also looked up the graphics of the files at the FEC and those pics of the paperwork show the name spelled with the "i".


42 posted on 10/29/2006 4:18:51 AM PST by mewzilla (Property must be secured or liberty cannot exist. John Adams)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: WestVirginiaRebel

A big corporation secret:

Many of them have subsidiaries that own sub-subsidiaries that produce porn. Porn is a very profitable industry.


43 posted on 10/29/2006 4:19:03 AM PST by TomGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dane
Hey, Ken Mehlman, are you doing the same thing we are right now? I hope you are.
44 posted on 10/29/2006 4:19:48 AM PST by madconserv (Jesus take the wheel- The time is here.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Nextrush
Sort of protection money, I guess.

The Capitol Hill Mafia.
45 posted on 10/29/2006 4:20:09 AM PST by TomGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: mewzilla
I have no sympathy for the campaigns. Of either party. If they can't be bothered to check who's sending them money, then they deserve what they get. Considering the sophisticated databases they have for trolling for cash, they should be able to figure out who's sending it. Anyone who took this guy's dough deserves the embarrassment.

Oh please get off your perfection horse. They get thousands of checks every day and some bad apples are going to get through no matter what.

BTW, when you reach your perfect political world, how bout sending me a post card. JMO, that post card will a long time coming.

46 posted on 10/29/2006 4:20:51 AM PST by Dane ("Mr. Gorbachev, tear down this wall" Ronald Reagan, 1987)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Dane

Probably the same guy. Lives in Chatsworth, does business in North Hollywood.


47 posted on 10/29/2006 4:23:28 AM PST by Mojave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Dane

Do you have any idea of the databases both political parties have? They know who's got money. They know who's sending it. This is more about sticky fingers than ignorance.


48 posted on 10/29/2006 4:24:28 AM PST by mewzilla (Property must be secured or liberty cannot exist. John Adams)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Dane

I don't expect perfection. But I do think expecting a candidate to refuse money from porn perchants isn't too much to ask.


49 posted on 10/29/2006 4:28:47 AM PST by mewzilla (Property must be secured or liberty cannot exist. John Adams)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: WestVirginiaRebel

Better a porn king than the Chinese Communists.


50 posted on 10/29/2006 4:29:05 AM PST by Retired Chemist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mewzilla

perchants=merchants


51 posted on 10/29/2006 4:29:08 AM PST by mewzilla (Property must be secured or liberty cannot exist. John Adams)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: Retired Chemist
Better a porn king than the Chinese Communists.

Hows about neither? :)

52 posted on 10/29/2006 4:29:39 AM PST by mewzilla (Property must be secured or liberty cannot exist. John Adams)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: A.Hun
"I searched it, and it showed 3700.00 in contributions in mostly 250 increments."

Those little increments is how they sneaked it in under the RNC radar.
I smell a democreep conspiracy.
53 posted on 10/29/2006 4:38:45 AM PST by madconserv (Jesus take the wheel- The time is here.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Dane

I'm a hypocrite.

When I was a teenager I experimented with drugs.

Today as a parent I admonish my children to not experiment with drugs.

There are worse things than being called a hypocrite.


54 posted on 10/29/2006 4:39:38 AM PST by aligncare (Beware the Media-Industrial Complex!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: madconserv

Me too...it certainly won't be a problem for the RNC.


55 posted on 10/29/2006 4:46:31 AM PST by A.Hun (Common sense is no longer common.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: TomGuy

You care to give one example or source, or are you just pulling this out of your backside? I vote for backside.


56 posted on 10/29/2006 4:48:52 AM PST by ItisaReligionofPeace
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: A.Hun
Hey atilla.

The MSM may start beating their drum over this...but I don't think many will dance to their rhythm.
57 posted on 10/29/2006 4:55:04 AM PST by aligncare (Beware the Media-Industrial Complex!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: dogbyte12
During a not so long ago campaign for governor in CA, groups with Christian sounding names were contributing to this Republican Candidate's Campaign. NAACP came out saying -- aha! This Candidate is taking donations from white supremacist groups. Back out now, or we'll blast the internet and MSM with it.

Within days, the R candidate brought pro-life/anti-abortion to forefront in his campaign.

California got D-Gray Davis for its governor.

Ergo, I concur with your post: BFD. I've seen the world go round and round. I've seen "planted campaign donations", too. GOP should not worry over this "blurb" but continue to forge ahead.

58 posted on 10/29/2006 4:58:36 AM PST by Alia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: mewzilla
That happens. And sometimes, I've found females contributing under their legal names while also contributing under their maiden names AND their business names. I've found "ethnic" groups contributing under their "ethnic" name while also contributing under their "American" names.

So, it glows...

59 posted on 10/29/2006 5:04:50 AM PST by Alia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: mewzilla
Have to disagree with you. During certain campaigns we received copies of letters from leftist groups with a ton of "allied organizational" names on the letterhead. Doing a great deal of digging, it was revealed it was only 5 people but having filed under multipled 5013c orgs names.

You look at the letterhead, ya think, "hundreds". But it wasn't. It was 5 people.

60 posted on 10/29/2006 5:07:18 AM PST by Alia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-64 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson