| DEMOCRATS: WEAK ON DEFENSE
DEMOCRATS HAVE REPEATEDLY VOTED TO SLASH INTELLIGENCE FUNDING
Do YOU want THEM to take over the Congress?
(EVERY Democrat elected to Congress WILL vote for the ultra-liberal San Franciscan Nancy Pelosi or some other terrorist-appeaser for Speaker of the House). EVERY Democrat elected to the Senate WILL vote for "cut and run" Harry Reid for Majority Leader and block pro-security judges nominated to the Supreme and appellate courts. Democrats Have Repeatedly Voted To Cut Intelligence Funding, Even After September 11th:
In 2003, 33 SENATE Democrats Voted To Withhold $50 Million In Intelligence Funding. (H.R. 2658, CQ Vote #287: Motion Agreed To 62-34: R 51-0; D 11-33; I 0-1, 7/17/03)
In 2003, 44 SENATE Democrats Supported An Amendment That Would Have Transferred $300 Million Away From Intelligence Activities. (H.R. 2555, CQ Vote #294: Motion Agreed To 50-48: R 48-3; D 2-44; I 0-1, 7/23/03)
In 1996, 154 House Democrats Voted To Reduce The Total Amount Authorized By The Fiscal Year 1997 Intelligence Authorization By 4.9 Percent. (H.R. 3259, CQ Vote #187: Rejected 192-235: R 37-193; D 154-42; I 1-0, 5/22/96)
In 1995, 40 SENATE Democrats Voted To Slash FBI Funding By $80 Million. (H.R. 2076, CQ Vote #480: Adopted 49-41: R 9-40; D 40-1, 9/29/95)
In 1993, 120 House Democrats Voted To Cut Intelligence By $500 Million. (H.R. 2330, CQ Vote #393: Rejected: 134-299: R 13-159; D 120-14; I 1-0, 8/4/93)
In 1989, 31 House Democrats Voted Against Authorizing Appropriations For Intelligence And Intelligence-Related Activities Of The U.S. Government For The CIA And Related Agencies. (H.R. 2748, CQ Vote #288: Passed 369-31: R 161-8; D 208-23, 10/12/89)
- "American supremacy is the greatest threat to the world today." -- George Soros, MoveOn.org's billionaire benefactor
- "Now it's our party! We bought it, we own it!"-- Radical leftist Eli Pariser, one of the organizers and leaders of MoveOn.org, referring to the Democratic Party.
- "Last fall, the far-Left Nation magazine declared a purge – an exercise at which the Left excels – against any Democrat unwilling to cut-and-run." -- Ben Johnson, 8/9/06 [and, together with all the other left-wing nutcases, they beat Sen. Joe Lieberman, the last of the strong-on-security Democrats, in his Senatorial primary]
- The Democrats still insist that acts of terrorism be treated as law enforcement problems (just as they did during the Clinton administration) instead of acts of war, even though that always means assigning attorneys and legal defense to captured terrorists and revealing to them AND THEIR ENTIRE NETWORKS all the evidence against them (which usually reveals HOW THAT EVIDENCE WAS OBTAINED). In a very real sense, therefore, they really ARE "The terrorists' rights party."
- "There was no plan on Al Qaeda that was passed from the Clinton administration to the Bush administration." -- Richard Clarke, here: http://tinyurl.com/2ntog
- Now about that hysteria over "warrantless searches": You can't even WRITE, let alone issue, a warrant to look for patterns in communications, a warrant for the purpose of eventually finding unexpected patterns that might appear out of the blue, like "liquids" mentioned along with "airplanes." It was THIS type of pattern recognition that allowed U.S. Intelligence agencies to alert the British about the latest terrorist airliner plot just before a radical-leftist appellate judge (nominated by Democrat Jimmy Carter -- and confirmed by the Senate ONLY BECAUSE DEMOCRATS WERE IN THE MAJORITY at the time) ruled that terrorist- monitoring is unconstitutional.
- "A strict observance of the written laws is doubtless one of the high duties of a good citizen, but it is not the highest. The laws of necessity, of self- preservation, of saving our country when in danger, are of higher obligation. To lose our country by a scrupulous adherence to written law would be to lose the law itself, with life, liberty, property, and all those who are enjoying them with us; thus absurdly sacrificing the end to the means." -- Thomas Jefferson to John Colvin, 1810
- "The Senate Select Committee on Intelligence has published a report that makes one wonder if they know who really is the enemy. ... In both houses of the U.S. Congress the committees and sub-committees which used to concern themselves with threats to national security by alien and subversive groups have been closed down. There is, however, a Senate Committee to ride herd on our intelligence gathering agencies to see that they number one, operate lawfully, and number two, effectively. So far they've only concerned themselves with number one." -- Ronald Reagan, June 15, 1977 (when both houses of Congress were controlled by DEMOCRATS)
- "In a very real sense, the reason September eleven of '01 happened is because right behind me about five blocks the [Democrat-controlled] Frank Church committee hearings in the early 1970's and the [Democrat] Carter administration later in the 1970's largely destroyed the CIA's operations directorate." -- Tom Clancy on Kudlow and Cramer, 9/2/03
- "Actually you can trace our failures in stopping global terror all the way back to Jimmy Carter and Democratic Senator Frank Church." -- Neal Boortz, 9/1/03
- "Carter helped to usher in the 'Iranian Revolution' of 1979 by leaning on the [pro- U.S.] Shah of Iran to 'release political prisoners' [which ultimately led to his downfall and his replacement by the Islamofascist mullahs and ayatollahs]." -- Larry Elder, 8/24/06
- The first country to steal oilfields developed by western companies' advanced technology (which gave those companies rightful ownership) was Iran in 1951. The inaction and silence (and possibly tacit approval) on the part of Prime Minister Attlee [Labor Party] in the U.K., with the acquiescence of President Truman [Democrat] in the U.S. (and the invisible, extremely slow and unnecessarily secretive response on the part of their eventual successors) set the stage for all the other Muslim countries in the middle east to eagerly follow suit, eventually giving to pathetic primitive barbarians the ability to purchase nuclear weapons (let alone computers) and spread unspeakably evil philosophies around the world.
- ALWAYS REMEMBER WHO SAID THIS (and why we have his country surrounded): "...Is it possible for us to witness a world without America and Zionism?...you had best know that this slogan and this goal are attainable, and surely can be achieved..." -- Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, "elected" leader of Iran
Now here's something ELSE scary: Nomatter how nice they may be in person, EVERY Democrat in the Congress WILL vote for San Francisco's soft-on-terrorism Nancy Pelosi or some other moveon- beholden liberal for Speaker of the House, 3rd in line for the Presidency. YOU MIGHT AS WELL JUMP RIGHT NOW TO THE EXCELLENT EDITORIAL: "97 Reasons Democrats Are Weak On Defense And Can't Be Trusted To Govern In Wartime" HERE: http://snipurl.com/xror
DEMOCRATS HAVE REPEATEDLY VOTED AGAINST FUNDING FOR OUR TROOPS FIGHTING THE WAR ON TERROR
Many of them have a very low regard for them anyway. Do YOU want THEM to take over the Congress?
Democrats Have Voted Against Billions In Funding To Support Our Troops In Iraq And Afghanistan:
In 2005, 54 House Democrats Voted Against Over $37 Billion In Funding For Military Operations In Iraq And Afghanistan. (H.R. 1268, CQ Vote #161: Adopted 368-58: R 225-3; D 143-54; I 0-1, 5/5/05)
In 2005, 39 House Democrats Voted Against Over $53 Billion In Funding For Military Operations And Reconstruction In Iraq And Afghanistan. (H.R. 1268, CQ Vote #77: Passed 388-43: R 226-3; D 162-39; I 0-1, 3/16/05)
In 2003, 11 SENATE Democrats Voted Against $87 Billion For Military Operations And Reconstruction In Iraq And Afghanistan. (S. 1689, CQ Vote #400: Passed 87-12: R 50-0; D 37-11; I 0-1, 10/17/03)
In 2003, 115 House Democrats Voted Against $87 Billion For Military Operations and Reconstruction In Iraq And Afghanistan. (H.R. 3289, CQ Vote #601: Adopted 298-121: R 216-5; D 82-115; I 0-1; 10/31/03)
Study THIS from the Democrats' 2006 choice for President:On Dec. 4th of last year John Kerry told "Face the Nation" host Bob Schieffer, "...there is no reason, Bob, that young American soldiers need to be going into the homes of Iraqis in the dead of night, terrorizing kids and children, you know, women..." During the Vietnam War in 1970 he told a Congressional committee that American soldiers, "...raped, cut off ears, cut off heads, taped wires from portable telephones to human genitals and turned up the power, cut off limbs, blown up bodies, randomly shot at civilians, razed villages in fashion reminiscent of [J]enghis Khan, shot cattle and dogs for fun, poisoned food stocks..." -- see http://snipurl.com/10yof
DEMOCRATS WOULD HAVE LEFT US HELPLESS AGAINST NORTH KOREA’S MISSILES
Do YOU want THEM to take over the Congress?
If Democrats Succeeded In Cutting Missile Defense The U.S. Would Not Be Able To Defend Itself Against North Korea’s Missiles:
The Wall Street Journal: “The Navy had at least one ship-based Aegis missile-defense system deployed off the Korean coast, with a potential to shoot down a North Korean missile.” (Editorial, “The Taepodong Democrats,” The Wall Street Journal, 7/21/06)
- The Wall Street Journal: “The Aegis cruisers have successfully shot down missiles in seven of eight tests in recent years, and could become an important player in protecting allies and U.S. forces against regional missile threats.” (Editorial, “The Taepodong Democrats,” The Wall Street Journal, 7/21/06)
- The Wall Street Journal: “The U.S. is also dispatching PAC-3s, a more sophisticated version of the Patriot anti-missile system, to Japan. This kind of capability adds to the credibility of the U.S. deterrent, reassures allies and enhances American influence.” (Editorial, “The Taepodong Democrats,” The Wall Street Journal, 7/21/06)
- The Wall Street Journal: “Virtually none of this would exist had Democrats succeeded over the years in their many attempts to kill missile defenses.” (Editorial, “The Taepodong Democrats,” The Wall Street Journal, 7/21/06)
- The Wall Street Journal: “[W]ith President Clinton in office, Democrats starved the program of funds.” (Editorial, “The Taepodong Democrats,” The Wall Street Journal, 7/21/06)
-- excerpted from http://www.gop.com/weakandwrong/#demancREMEMBER: Nomatter how nice they may be in person, EVERY Democrat in the Congress WILL vote for San Francisco's soft-on-terrorism Nancy Pelosi or some other moveon-beholden liberal for Speaker of the House, 3rd in line for the Presidency. The takeover of the Democratic Party by soft-on- terrorism appeaseniks is demonstrated by the loss of strong-on-security Joe Lieberman in the primaries. "America's national security is the lowest priority on the Democratic Party agenda." -- David Horowitz
And remember, it was John Kerry who wanted to give nuclear fuel to the fanatic mullahs who run Iran (!) Please DON'T let the Democrats take over Congress.
So GET TO THE POLLS and VOTE REPUBLICAN this November. See: RECKLESS DISREGARD: How Liberal Democrats Undercut Our Military, Endanger Our Soldiers, and Jeopardize Our Security by Lt. Col. Buzz Patterson here:http://makeashorterlink.com/?K117225DD See: How the North Koreans Suckered Carter & Clinton into Putting them into the Nuclear Reactor Business here: http://FreedomKeys.com/agreedframework.htm The capture of Bin Laden was blocked several times during the Clinton administration, including four times by national security adviser Sandy Berger alone. See: http://snipurl.com/w98a See: "In his eight years in office, President Clinton's military response to the terrorist threats was negligible and did nothing to seriously address the problem, instead following a de facto course of drift, which allowed the terrorist network to grow in size and strength." here: http://snipurl.com/w9wz See why former FBI Director Louis Freeh thinks the 9/11 Commission deserves an "incomplete" grade here: http://snipurl.com/w99a See how the "wall of separation" which Deputy Attorney General Jamie Gorelick helped to build between the FBI and the CIA during the Clinton administration made it virtually impossible for U.S. authorities to stop Ahmed Rassam and other terrorists, including on 9/11 here: http://snipurl.com/w9a4 See how "Jamie Gorelick, a member of the September 11 commission, has a major conflict-of-interest problem." here: http://snipurl.com/w9al See "WIRETAP" here:
http://www.citizensunited.org/Multimedia/details.aspx?id=14 The REAL John Kerry here:
http://FreedomKeys.com/propagandist.htm See the differences between the edited AND unedited versions of ABC's 'The Path to 9/11' here:
http://snipurl.com/w8as See "The Anti-Americans" here:
http://FreedomKeys.com/anti-americans.htm Also see "Hypocrisy on Iraq" here:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ePb6H-j51xE "The Secret History of the Iraq War" here:
http://FreedomKeys.com/secrethistory.htm "MYTHS AND FACTS ABOUT IRAQ" here: http://www.thetruthaboutiraq.org/myths.htm And "WHY IRAQ?" here:
http://FreedomKeys.com/whyiraq.htm "There is something terribly wrong with people seeking to demean and weaken the president in war time, thereby strengthening our country's enemies. As a result of the language and tactics of those opposed to our presence in Iraq, our enemies have been emboldened..." -- Ed Koch, former Democratic Mayor of New York City, here: http://snipurl.com/vsf0 "If Bill Clinton had been a virgin, he would still have been the most immoral president in this country's history. In exchange for illegal campaign contributions from the government of China, he allowed the Chinese to buy American technology, which now makes them capable of hitting American cities with nuclear missiles." -- Dr. Thomas Sowell, here: http://www.freedomkeys.com/slimeball.htm "Carter and Clinton saw so many sides of every issue that what appeared to their eyes was not a unified image but a view at the sub-atomic level--a pixilated version of the big picture that registers trees instead of forest. ... Carter, meanwhile, continues to write essays indicating he has no idea that North Korea [WHICH THE CLINTON ADMINISTRATION BUILT NUCLEAR PLANTS FOR after Carter got them to pledge no bomb-making] began breaking its pledge to him the moment his plane took off." -- Joel Engel, here: http://snipurl.com/x4jx "In order for Democrats to be elected, they have to hide who they really are." -- Neal Boortz, here: http://tinyurl.com/yef8mk Also see: The good things the 2003 tax cuts have brought here: http://FreedomKeys.com/2003taxcuts.htm and please PASS IT ALONG ---------->
-- You can make a cleaner copy by going to this page
and copying it or sending it as-is:
http://FreedomKeys.com/demsondefense.htm
|
|
- |
|
<----------------------------
COPY AND EMAIL
TO EVERYONE
YOU CAN <----------------------------
<----------------------------
COPY AND EMAIL
TO EVERYONE
YOU CAN <----------------------------
<----------------------------
COPY AND EMAIL
TO EVERYONE
YOU CAN <----------------------------
<----------------------------
COPY AND EMAIL
TO EVERYONE
YOU CAN <----------------------------
<----------------------------
COPY AND EMAIL
TO EVERYONE
YOU CAN <----------------------------
<----------------------------
COPY AND EMAIL
TO EVERYONE
YOU CAN <----------------------------
<----------------------------
COPY AND EMAIL
TO EVERYONE
YOU CAN <----------------------------
<----------------------------
COPY AND EMAIL
TO EVERYONE
YOU CAN <----------------------------
<----------------------------
COPY AND EMAIL
TO EVERYONE
YOU CAN
-- and bookmark THIS
<----------------------------
|
