Rest In Peace, old friend, your work is finished.......
If you want on or off the DIESEL "KnOcK" LIST just FReepmail me........
This is a fairly HIGH VOLUME ping list on some days......
Posted on 06/05/2007 4:24:51 AM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
Simple, clever, fun. That's the philosophy behind the vehicle you see pictured above, the Loremo (pronounced lo-ray-mo which is short for Low Resistance Mobile). Of course, there's nothing simple about designing and building a car, but there has certainly been a large need for cleverness to meet our current standard of "fun".
Don't let the picture fool you. There's nothing really new here, aside from the impressive 50g/km CO2 figure. This car achieves its high level of fuel efficiency by taking current fuel-saving methods to a level almost beyond reason. A main part of this is weight saving. Every part of the car has been stripped down to its 'bare essentials', including the interior, chassis, wheels and tires, and engine (though oddly enough, it still possesses a navigation system). The designers have optimized its drag coefficient all the way to the width of the tires - wider tire = more friction. This is a good thing, since engine options are either a 2-cylinder 20hp turbodiesel, or a 3-cylinder 50hp turbodiesel. The former will get you to sixty miles per hour in a blistering 20 seconds, while the latter will get you there in 9. Fuel efficiency, however, is very impressive - 1.5L per 100 km (translated 188 mpg). Not too shabby.
The coupe is labeled as a 2+2 because the trunk boot is 'ergonomically shaped' so that two children can fit "comfortably" facing rearward - given, of course, that they don't get car sick. One enters the car by opening the front or rear 'gate' (see gallery). The front lifts the entire nose section from the A-pillar forward, taking the steering wheel with it. According to the website, it's as easy as getting in a bathtub. Uh-huh.
It'll be a while before we can test that out. Production versions of the Loremo won't be available until 2009. Weighing in at just over 990 lbs. to just under 1040 lbs., it might be fun to drive - but is it worth the pain to one's cornea? I mean, I like the headlights and taillights, and even the Tesla-esque nose, but really. The profile doesn't look as though it has evolved past the early sixties. Retro isn't that much back in.
Maybe if I saw one in person... nah.
Where do you think I got the photo that I posted?
That looks like something I’d buy in the toy department at Wal-Mart.
well, the fuel economy sounds good, but then on second thought, the idea with lifting the “hood” to enter the car is unbelievably stupid. On top of the fact that it would be a pain if it rains, what if you get in an accident? The “hood” thing and the hinge would most likely be bent and chances are pretty good you would be trapped in there. Insane if you ask me.
well, the fuel economy sounds good, but then on second thought, the idea with lifting the “hood” to enter the car is unbelievably stupid. On top of the fact that it would be a pain if it rains, what if you get in an accident? The “hood” thing and the hinge would most likely be bent and chances are pretty good you would be trapped in there. Insane if you ask me.
Rest In Peace, old friend, your work is finished.......
If you want on or off the DIESEL "KnOcK" LIST just FReepmail me........
This is a fairly HIGH VOLUME ping list on some days......
That would look real cute stuck up under my jeep.
BTW, post #3 is not the Loremo, but an unidentified tiny automobile.
Are you referring to the front entry, or the rear seat entry?
Almost any car has precip enter the cabin if there is wind.
And as for the engineering: the article describes their motivation: weight reduction.
Once again, per the comments I made on another high-MPG thread today: they need a better transmission. These five-speeds ain’t gonna get the maximum fuel mileage out of a diesel. Diesels have pretty narrow optimum RPM bands, and the job of any auto engineer using a diesel should be to put enough gears into the tranny to maximize the number of miles spent at optimum RPM, regardless of actual road speed.
I gotta get me one!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.