It’s still early, and EVERY TRUE CONSERVATIVE should support Duncan Hunter, or we just might lose our sovereignty some day.
I’m seeing countless folks saying Hunter would make a good VP because he’s so good, or Hunter is the best guy, but his poll numbers are too low, yada, yada.
But gosh, if all the folks used that naysaying “energy” and wrote an editor’s letter, or called a talk show to help Hunter, his poll #’s would increase.
I have read that around 95% of Hunter’s campaign money comes from regular folks, like me. Big biz won’t help him out, because they are doing business with Red China, and don’t want to lose that slave labor, even if the $275 BILLION EACH YEAR trade deficit is making China a superpower.
So it’s up to us regular folks to help Hunter out financially.
When conservatives know about Hunter here’s how they vote:
“Duncan Hunter doubled the totals of the next-closest candidate, garnering 534 of approximately 1,400 votes cast. Fred Thompson came in second with 266 votes, and Paul rounded out the top three with 217 votes.
Here are all the results:
Duncan Hunter: 534
Fred Thompson: 266
Ron Paul: 217
Mike Huckabee: 83
Rudy Giuliani: 78
Mitt Romney: 61
Ray McKinney: 28
John Cox: 10
John McCain: 8
Sam Brownback: 6
Tom Tancredo: 6
Hugh Cort: 3”
And now for my question of the day: Can you tell me in a few sentences, in your own words, what ISSUES have prompted you to support Fred?
Suffice it to say, Duncan WILL make an excellent VP, and get the face time he really needs for people to get his message. I am only pointing out the obvious, which seems to escape the DH supporters. And yes, Duncan did very well in Texas. But hasn't done squat anywhere else.
You DH supporters say the polls aren't everything, yet when your guy runs at or near the top, you expound on it as if it was the second coming. And that 'momentum', he garnered in Texas has done zip for him, especially at a forum where he should have stood out in the crowd(Values Voters), and didn't.
The truth is still the truth, no matter how you spin it.