Posted on 11/05/2007 3:01:24 AM PST by RogerFGay
A recent Rasmussen Report states that 25% of Republican women are planning to vote for Hillary while 25% of Democrat men are planning to vote Republican.
My contention is that these women were never really "conservatives" in the first place and the men, having been true liberals for a long while, are now recognizing that the Democratic Party has a toxic future agenda for heterosexual males.
Many American men can remember how, in 1998, there was no opinion of the Monica Lewinsky issue that would appease the fury of many insecure women on the subject. If one said that Bill Clinton was a cad, many liberal women would snap back with an angry defense that he was innocent. If one said that Bill's affair was none of anyone's business there would be a harsher reaction from many liberal and conservative women alike. I personally learned to exercise my right to remain silent.
What a lot of men did not notice at that time, however, was that some "victim feminist" women were so incensed at the crime (of Bill sleeping with a younger woman) that they could not forgive the bored reactions of liberal male politicians and liberal journalists. In order to punish a male power base in the Democratic Party and give feminists total control in its reconstruction, they actually switched over to the Republican Party, where they forged an unholy alliance with self-righteous religious "conservatives" to propel George Bush into the Presidency based on his having "character" (remaining faithful to a wife his own age). I am not disparaging "loyalty to one's wife" here, but I am noting that this element was made to be far too important an issue in the 2000 election.
Over the years between 2000 and 2008, these new anti-Monica Republican women were able to transform the Republican Party into a feminism-loving institution and recently crowned their achievement by getting a record $430 in appropriations for the federal Office on Violence Against Women, an unconstitutional construct that their beloved Hillary helped create in 1995.
Of course many would argue that they had many crowning achievements during their reign over the Bush Administration, such as when an Indiana man recently received a life term on the sex offender list for having pulled a meandering teenage girl off a dangerous highway for her own safety. Noone will forget how they effectively stopped American men from saying hello to tens of thousands of foreign women via the so-called International Marriage Broker Regulation Act (IMBRA) which, irrespective of its name, persecutes innocent dating websites that only promote the idea of marriage while leaving pornographic dating sites exempted from their wrath.
These women were especially needed by George Bush during the War on Terror because they could be expected to be the most obsessed with male chauvinist Muslims. You could identify them as the ones saying "Kill, Kill, Kill" the loudest. In payment, these women have basically been given anything they wanted.
But now…their beloved Hillary is polling nationally at 48% in terms of possibly getting the Presidency.
What better way to avenge the humiliation of them all being cuckolded by Bill…then to make Hillary President and him the First Lady.
I believe the Rasmussen Report poll shows that these women are now ready to return home to the party where they belong.
The question is, will they be honest enough to quit their current jobs in conservative think tanks like the Heritage Foundation, as legislative aides for Republican politicians and as court clerks for Republican-appointed federal judges?
That's pretty much what it would take for me, been married, did that.
It would only happen again with a truly extraordinary woman, or far more likely, at the point of a bayonet...
Most women don't seem to have any self respect, if their behavior is a guide.
The vast majority want the stuff that used to be described in grade-school history and government classes
There is one other point. Hillary!™ is a Stalinist.
Stalin said, "He who votes doesn't count, only he who counts the votes counts..."
I haven’t been in grade school for a very long time and must admit that I was wondering about that when I posted the comment.
I was in grade school when we had to stop saying the morning prayer and singing the national anthem. I suppose teaching about the Bill of Rights and democracy has probably been outlawed by now too.
It was a issue of concern for many Americans that while the Chief Law Enforcement officer of the USA, Bill Clinton, knowingly lied under oath. A crime that would be a felony for anyone not so rabidly potected by the vast Left Wing Noise Machine as the Clinton family.
So the women so upset at Clinton and the intern scandal are going to vote to let Bill Clinton back into the White House - this time with a lot of free time on his hands...
Yeah, that makes sooo much sense.
Me too. It's been a rather disappointing ride ever since...
Ummmmm, who, exactly, do the clintons care about?
Was Monica paid to leak?
Dunno. But she was allowed to live.
You are expecting rational behavior????
The way I heard it she wasn't the leaker but the leakee.
If so, only as a cat’s paw. She too dumb to count on for anything requiring active participation.
It was a poll by her pollster Mark Penn.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.