Monica-Haters About to Leave Their Temporary Sojourn in the Republican Party

MensNewsDaily.com ^ | November 3, 2007 | Jim Peterson

[mware]

Interesting they fail to mention the democratic women who will not vote for Hillary.

[Kozak]

[DainBramage]

It all goes back to the Garden of Eden. Eve votes for the snake and gets everybody in trouble.

[Coldwater Creek]

Republican women are a lot smarter than given credit.

Maybe they are just fouling up the polls on purpose, I would if called.

[mware]

There is just no way a woman who is a republican would voted for Hillary.

[mware]

Hell, I know quite a few women who are democrats who said they would not vote for her.

This is the media way to demoralize Republicans from even voting.

As for me I am a broken glass republican, especially if it involves HIllary.

[bruinbirdman]

In any poll of Republicans, 25% will always give a bogus answer. I suppose the same is true of Socialists.

yitbos

[cajungirl]

So, is he suggesting we all just take a leap into new parties?

How about a Men’s Party and a Woman’s Party but you could switch votes across party lines. Would make marriage more interesting.

[RogerFGay]

I think he makes an important point regarding the effectiveness of letting a political party lose. In the two party system that’s pretty much the only way to get their attention. Once you’re really a free agent, you become a credible threat, and the world is at your door-step.

[kittymyrib]

Or that 25% could be conservative women who love to mess with pollsters and throw their results.

[Glenn]

Real classy post. Especially before breakfast. Moron.

[RogerFGay]

I think the Dem Reapers should form a single party called the Women’s Party and be done with it. Those women who do not prefer radical, man-hating, feminist communism don’t have to vote for them of course. (See also response #10)

[Kozak]

Yum. Enjoy. My pleasure.

[Iowamerican]

I don’t think it was a Rasmussen poll that said 25% of Republican women would vote for Hillary. I think it was a Clinton campaign internal poll.

[Moonman62]

Noone will forget how they effectively stopped American men from saying hello to tens of thousands of foreign women via the so-called International Marriage Broker Regulation Act (IMBRA) which, irrespective of its name, persecutes innocent dating websites that only promote the idea of marriage while leaving pornographic dating sites exempted from their wrath.

How long before there's a law that forces men to get married?

[paudio]

The question is, will they be honest enough to quit their current jobs in conservative think tanks like the Heritage Foundation, as legislative aides for Republican politicians and as court clerks for Republican-appointed federal judges?

Did I miss something? Does Rasmussen survey only those women as their respondents that the author are making such a 'question'?

[watsonfellow]

I think the above was a bit of satire.

[RogerFGay]

I think they’re working on wealth transfer schemes that don’t even require marriage before they start pilfering. They just don’t want foreign women to have any legitimate claim.

[RogerFGay]

I don’t think I understand your question. Rassmuson does a lot of polling on all kinds of things.