Posted on 11/05/2007 3:01:24 AM PST by RogerFGay
A recent Rasmussen Report states that 25% of Republican women are planning to vote for Hillary while 25% of Democrat men are planning to vote Republican.
My contention is that these women were never really "conservatives" in the first place and the men, having been true liberals for a long while, are now recognizing that the Democratic Party has a toxic future agenda for heterosexual males.
Many American men can remember how, in 1998, there was no opinion of the Monica Lewinsky issue that would appease the fury of many insecure women on the subject. If one said that Bill Clinton was a cad, many liberal women would snap back with an angry defense that he was innocent. If one said that Bill's affair was none of anyone's business there would be a harsher reaction from many liberal and conservative women alike. I personally learned to exercise my right to remain silent.
What a lot of men did not notice at that time, however, was that some "victim feminist" women were so incensed at the crime (of Bill sleeping with a younger woman) that they could not forgive the bored reactions of liberal male politicians and liberal journalists. In order to punish a male power base in the Democratic Party and give feminists total control in its reconstruction, they actually switched over to the Republican Party, where they forged an unholy alliance with self-righteous religious "conservatives" to propel George Bush into the Presidency based on his having "character" (remaining faithful to a wife his own age). I am not disparaging "loyalty to one's wife" here, but I am noting that this element was made to be far too important an issue in the 2000 election.
Over the years between 2000 and 2008, these new anti-Monica Republican women were able to transform the Republican Party into a feminism-loving institution and recently crowned their achievement by getting a record $430 in appropriations for the federal Office on Violence Against Women, an unconstitutional construct that their beloved Hillary helped create in 1995.
Of course many would argue that they had many crowning achievements during their reign over the Bush Administration, such as when an Indiana man recently received a life term on the sex offender list for having pulled a meandering teenage girl off a dangerous highway for her own safety. Noone will forget how they effectively stopped American men from saying hello to tens of thousands of foreign women via the so-called International Marriage Broker Regulation Act (IMBRA) which, irrespective of its name, persecutes innocent dating websites that only promote the idea of marriage while leaving pornographic dating sites exempted from their wrath.
These women were especially needed by George Bush during the War on Terror because they could be expected to be the most obsessed with male chauvinist Muslims. You could identify them as the ones saying "Kill, Kill, Kill" the loudest. In payment, these women have basically been given anything they wanted.
But now…their beloved Hillary is polling nationally at 48% in terms of possibly getting the Presidency.
What better way to avenge the humiliation of them all being cuckolded by Bill…then to make Hillary President and him the First Lady.
I believe the Rasmussen Report poll shows that these women are now ready to return home to the party where they belong.
The question is, will they be honest enough to quit their current jobs in conservative think tanks like the Heritage Foundation, as legislative aides for Republican politicians and as court clerks for Republican-appointed federal judges?
Nah, the girly men are the men’s party unless they are hairdressers, decorators or gourmet cooks. Then we will take them in.
What you need is a sense of humor.
Does anyone really believe Mark Penn in telling a national audiance that 25% of Pub women will actually vote for the Hildabeast? Knowing many Pub female voters in precinct work, I think this is wishful thinking to stampade unthinking younger females who have no political connection but Pubs? Nonsence. They know the evil of the liberal Dems including a female who poses as a Saviour and really is a Destroyer.
Wow, I thought I knew all the stories of the Evil we call feminism but I hadn't heard about those two. Of course, Lefty women calling themselves by any other name would have no problem with porno dating sites. Casual sex is GOOD to feminists and their followers. But *marriage* to a foreign woman... Marriage oppresses women don't you know. Also the competition from foreign woman cuts down on the ability of home grown American feminists to hold on to the wild hope of ever wrangling an American man into marriage. Jealousy thy name is woman.
Roger, you are right to suggest that the Republican party is in bed with feminists. They have been for a long time...predating the Monica scandal even. Republican men...conservative men...they long have believed in being chivalrous to little ladies...even when the women in question are anything BUT ladies. Lots of Republican/conservative women demand that same chivalrous treatment continue right here on these boards day after day while saying out of the other side of their mouths that they believe in "equality." Democrat...Republican...what's the difference?
It would be a big improvement over what we have now. Right now all we have is one big Woman's Party.
With the informal marriage strike going on amongst younger men, we might see that in a generation or so.
While there may be a lot of truth in the above, I believe it goes beyond that. Women are finding it harder to find men willing to commit to marriage. Many of these young men saw what their mothers did to their fathers in divorce court and they don't want that to happen to them so they shy away from marriage and from casual sex (meaning a condom is always a must in order to prevent an oopsie baby).
Some men are seeking out foreign women in the hopes they are not Americanized (feminized) to marry and have families with. For such men I think this is a dangerous tactic. It takes NO time at all for a foreign bride to become Americanized once she's living here. But the real point is that woman don't want to share their shrinking pool of eligible bachelors by opening up more competition from "traditional" foreign women.
And many here need to display more respect.
I have a good sense of humor, but I see your same statement so much on this forum, by many who will argue passionately for it, that it just really irritates me.
Think of it as fingernails on a blackboard.
Over the years between 2000 and 2008, these new anti-Monica Republican women were able to transform the Republican Party into a feminism-loving institution and recently crowned their achievement by getting a record $430 in appropriations for the federal Office on Violence Against Women, an unconstitutional construct that their beloved Hillary helped create in 1995.
***Interesting take. bmflr.
Sigh. You are right. What were our ancestors thinking when they gave away the farm.............
Reagan a closet liberal? I don’t think you’re being sarcastic...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.