Posted on 07/21/2008 3:31:32 AM PDT by Amityschild
READER'S NOTE: The following is an update to the original post that explains the theory behind the research, and to assist those who have not read any of my previous posts. Also, comments have been reopened.
BREAKING NEWS! Blog contributor, TechDude, has released a long-awaited document that represents a cooperative venture among myself, TechDude, and TexasDarlin. By combining my original analyses along with his own, TechDude has validated what I have been saying since June 19 -- that the images posted on the Daily Kos website, the Obama campaign website, and the FactCheck website are indeed, fakes, frauds, and forgeries. We have demonstrated in our empirically-derived evidence why these images are not genuine, to which the most that our detractors can offer are endless conjectures and ad hominem arguments.
OBAMA’S FAKE BIRTH CERTIFICATE: why I’m STILL right, and they’re wrong.
(Excerpt) Read more at polarik.blogtownhall.com ...
BTW, I have re-enabled the comments on my current blog post. I temporarily disabled them because one person was making it his personal blog.
I also updated it with a synopsis of everything I found since my original post on June 19.
But, there is another twist to it that I won’t reveal until someone finds it.
I’m devious like that.
Finally, we may see the light of day.
Your semantic differential is also quite high, as is the sense of having a diffuse time dilation factor.
I tried to go to you site to read the story and both links gave me a blank screen with FORBIDDEN written at the top.
Born in United States, son of a United States citizen, therefore he is a US Citizen. Simple as that. Sorry, but this is nonsense, and it doesn’t help.
At the same time he buys off on all the sample documents he received from others as being apparently legitimate even though they all have the same "kerning".
In my experience kerning is either on or off in the most commonly used software packages that set up print fields ~ . I find it highly unlikely that Hawaii's techs always turn it on after a re-install ~ which, since 2003/4 is usually done almost every day on most large systems. Just one of the little minor irritants that drove so many of us to start retirement at the same time ~ let's define it as "the moment you realize your NORMAL format ain't NORMAL and you gotta' go through and recreate it. This problem was devastating for pre-formatted "bed bug" letters, or stock paragraphs in more informative letters.
En zo, what do you imagine are the odds that this guy "got a dose" of equally questionable documents where the guy preping the goods RESET KERNING TO ON everyday?
You realize we had the same problem with the Rather forgeries. There we knew that "back in the day" kerning wasn't available to the degree it had become with the arrival of Word. So even if 99.999% of every characteristic that appeared in the document could have been done in the early 1970s, you couldn't just TURN KERNING ON, yet it appeared the compositor had done exactly that.
Now we have another batch of documents ~ purported to be the test documents used to compare against the KOS document, and they, too have KERNING ON.
Do we have the same guy ginning up stuff for us instead of Dan Rather this time?
I will ask him this morning.
The rest of the problems seem to arise out of the use of a low-res scanner (maybe a cellphone?) to gin an image to dump into any one of several popular graphics programs to "reformat" it for inclusion in a website ~ and what was it, a .gif, or a .jpg? We'd need to know at each stage of the game ~ transformations from one format standard to another and back several times do create strange stuff.
Not sure why. The link takes me to Polarik’s article.
I would like for Obama to actually release his birth certificate. Also, I would like to know if he registered for selective service. If not, he isn’t eligible for federal employement... thus, can’t be president or U.S. Senator?
I’d want the release from Hawaii, not some political organization, before I’d believe it at this point.
If he was not born in the U.S. (like Hawaii), then he can’t be president. If is was born in the U.S. and is just being a horse’s a##, then he loses credibiity and won’t be president.
At any rate, he ought to be about full disclosure. When a person runs for the highest office in the land, life becomes an open book. He ought to have known that.
So just have Hawaii release the birth certificate, if, in fact it exists.
Barry O. is hiding behind too many clouds. His Illinois senate record is one of the other clouds.
Amazingly just about everything you guys have to say about the digital image purported to be a picture of Obama’s birth certificate can be said about all the other digital images purported to be pictures of anything on the net.
Your semantic differential is also quite high, as is the sense of having a diffuse time dilation factor.
Having read his analysis and his research...YOU don’t know what you are talking about. Just another ignorant statement from someone sounding suspiciously liberal.
Born in United States, son of a United States citizen, therefore he is a US Citizen. Simple as that. Sorry, but this is nonsense, and it doesn’t help.
This can be resolved easily ~ offer to pay him a million bucks or something, to get a new one, and follow him around while he gets it.
The rest of the problems seem to arise out of the use of a low-res scanner (maybe a cellphone?) to gin an image to dump into any one of several popular graphics programs to “reformat” it for inclusion in a website ~ and what was it, a .gif, or a .jpg? We’d need to know at each stage of the game ~ transformations from one format standard to another and back several times do create strange stuff.
I need to go back and check it, but in his report, I think he said that the DailyKOS image is straight from the Hawaiian government office. If it did start out as a cell phone image, I don’t buy that causing “pixel shifts” which would need to be your argument.
The discrepancy in the pixels can more easily be explained by the forger making a “best effort” but being too rushed or lazy to check the pixel alignment.
The software for the image from the Hawaiian office would have specific instructions for which pixels to black out.
But to make matters worse, the Hawaiian government refuses to release Obama’s original. They have to be compelled to do so with a big lawsuit. So, we are left with this problem. People in government are protecting Obama. It is very tempting to infer that the truth is being hidden.
Obama could solve the problem by releasing the info, that is unless the info is damning...
Why do you want to pursue this line of nonsense, especially when our own nominee was born in the Panama Canal zone and about to face his own line of nonsense questions?
He didn’t do it alone like he makes it out to be.
Who has verified that?
McCain has to prove he is eligible.
Why doesn’t Obama have to do the same?
Agreed. Which is why we're saying that JPG images are not proof of anything, let alone Obama's genuine birth certificate.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.