Posted on 10/15/2008 8:50:28 PM PDT by Polarik
RETRACTION:
You may (or may not) have noticed that a recent post of mine concerning the website called, WHATSYOUREVIDENCE.COM, was removed because it contained incorrect assumptions and conclusions I made about the law firm, DickStein Shapiro LLP, in relation to the lawsuit filed by Philip Berg against Barack Obama and the Democratic National Committee.
I hereby retract any and all statements and references, whether direct or indirect, that in any way led the reader to believe that a connection exists, or existed, between this law firm and Berg's lawsuit. To my knowledge, as has been clarified by legitimate sources, there has never been any connection between the two, past, present, or future.
I respectfully request that any copies made of that original post be discarded.
With that said, the primary purpose of my original post was to refute a concerted effort made by the owner and operator of the website, WHATSYOUREVIDENCE.COM, to discredit and denigrate my research on the Obama COLB image, to attack my credibility, and to trash my family name, Polarik, through the use of insinuations, innuendos, false allegations, false statements, false or faulty conclusions, unsubstantiated information, and unreliable and patently biased sources that are also hostile to me personally.
Furthermore, this individual also made slanderous comments about me on her sources' websites under the screen name, "WYE," knowing full well that such detestable comments would never be acceptable on the owner's website, WHATSYOUREVIDENCE.COM.
In addition to setting the record straight as to who I am and what I have done, I did also present information that should have been readily disclosed to the public -- information that the public has a right to know -- rather than being held in secret, hidden from public view and scrutiny.
Although I take full responsibility for the erroneous assumptions and conclusions that were made about the law firm stated above, I hold the owner and creator of the website, WHATSYOUREVIDENCE.COM, fully responsible for inviting these assumptions and conclusions from visitors to her website, given as a verifiable matter of fact, that the said owner and creator of said website did intentionally withhold from public view, the following information:
All of the above are, by her own admission, and it is now a matter of public record, by virtue of her letter to the Free Republic "demanding" that the previous post be removed, that Ms. Teresa La Loggia is the sole owner and operator of WHATSYOUREVIDENCE.COM as previously stated in my post.
In restating and reiterating what the public now knows is true and factual about the owner and operator of WHATSYOUREVIDENCE.COM, there is absolutely no intent, whatsoever, on my part to damage or disparage whatever credibility or rights to privacy that is further claimed by Ms. Teresa La Loggia in relation to what is a restatement of verifiable fact that Ms. Teresa La Loggia is
It is also a matter of fact and public record, that she is not the listed owner, registrant, and administrative contact on the WHOIS domain registration database, and that the address provided for these is a foregin one.
It is also a matter of fact and public record, that her employer has made no statement, either expressed or implied, that they are either unaware of their employee's actions, or are aware of them, and have no problem with what she does on her own time with her own resources: which gives her the benefit of the doubt, that she has not used company time and/or company resources in connection with the operation of and contributions to her website.
In addition, I hereby reaffirm my statements, as a loyal and valued contributor to the Free Republic, that Teresa La Loggia has acted reprehensibly and irresponsibly, anonymously and secretively via her website, WHATSYOUREVIDENCE.COM, to discredit and denigrate the fully legal and fully proper lawsuit filed by Philip Berg against Barack Obama and the DNC, through the use of false statements, faulty conclusions, unsubstantiated information, unreliable and biased sources, and the use of insinuations and innuendo.
With these retractions and restatements made, I look forward to reposting the valuable information that was contained in my previous post, pledging and ensuring that it will be fully factual, verifiable, and in complete compliance with forum rules.
Sincerely,
Ronald Polarik, MS, PhD
How much are they suing you for?
I added the certifigate keyword.
When will the 2nd half of your latest analysis get posted?
Pinging everyone to the thread that replaces the deleted thread, ~ someone complained about,~ in case you wondered where it went. This article explains what happened.
What's really interesting is who reads Free Republic.
PWNED!
Excellent, Polarik!
Thumbs up!
as
obumpa
Bump
thanks LucyT
no worries, did not see the post
ZERO.
The law firm didn't complain at all. It was Teresa La Loggia who made a stink.
no worries mate, either, cause you'll see something a lot better.
Like Ms La Loggia's open letter to Free
Probably sometime this Sunday.
That’s hard to read formatted that way. Anyway you can refit that for a single screen viewing?
Thank you. I think Polarik already asked for his erroneous statements to be removed.
Teresa La Loggia, who:
Donated $2,500 to the OBama Campaign
In other words, not only is Ms. La Loggia fraudulently misreprenting herself as a nonpartisan investigator, she is blatantly violating legal ethics and pretty much every conflict of interest you can name.*
Pinging to #17 for an update.
Oh, LucyT...I will be seeing Governor Palin at a rally in Loveland, Co on Monday!!!! There are some benefits to living in a swing state.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.