Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

More Fish Cops, Less Liberty
FlyoverPress ^ | Dr Jimmy T. LaBaume

Posted on 11/10/2008 1:47:07 PM PST by gunnyg

More Fish Cops, Less Liberty

by

Dr Jimmy T (Gunny) LaBaume editor@flyoverpress.com www.flyoverpress.com

Back in February of 2007, I wrote about an encounter I had with one of the State's Game Keepers (See Liberty v. Fish Cops and Federalies). I am sad to report that the situation in the police state has deteriorated substantially since that time.

Some time between 4:30 and 5:00 PM on Friday, November 7, 2008 my wife and I arrived at the entrance to the property in Terrell County, Texas referred in the 2007 article cited above. The entrance to our private road (belonging to the property owners association) is off of US Highway 90 approximately 5 miles south of the small town of Sanderson, Texas. The gate is normally kept locked.

My wife had been driving on the highway. As we normally do, we stopped just inside the gate to switch drivers, stretch our legs, "water the dog," etc. The wife had walked on up the road with the dog (a small Chihuahua-Terrier cross named "Nemo" by a grand child). I had busied myself with adjusting the seat to suit my longer legs, closing the doors and preparing to continue our journey. We had not yet shut and locked the gate.

Suddenly, a green pick-up truck with the markings of the Texas Parks and Wildlife Service entered the gate and stopped behind our vehicle (a short-bed, step side, GMC pick-up loaded with tools, lumber and animal feed). The driver (a uniformed Game Warden) exited the state vehicle and approached. We exchanged the standard greetings; "How are you?" "Fine, thank you."

I finished adjusting the seat and turned to walk around the back of my vehicle to close the passenger door so we could proceed to our destination. As I walked in front of the young man, he inquired, "Where are you coming from?" At that time I made the decision to invoke and refuse to waive all of my constitutional rights and privileges—including being forced to talk to a functionary of the state (See: The Police Contact). I informed him that where I was coming from was none of his "bleeping" business.

He immediately flared. "YOU NEED TO SETTLE DOWN!"

I thought, 'I need to settle down? Sounds like you are the one that needs to settle down' as I proceeded to return to the driver's side of the vehicle. It is difficult to recall the exact sequence of events under such stress, but I believe this was about where I (for the first of at least ten times) asked him, "Am I under arrest?" I also informed him that, legally, "if I am not under arrest, then I am free to go."

He never gave me any indication that I might be under arrest so I proceeded to enter my vehicle and close the door to continue my journey. I noticed that the door seemed hard to shut. I glanced down and he was using his hand to block it. He released his resistance and the door closed.

I proceeded slowly up the road, stopped and picked up the wife and dog and continued along our private road. He returned to his vehicle and followed closely behind. I could see in the rear view that he was talking on the radio. 'Probably running my plates,' I thought.

We continued for approximately ½ to ¾ miles at which time he turned on his flashers. It was unsafe to stop (we were just beneath a steep, blind hill) so I tried to hand signal him to wait until I got to the top of the hill. But he insisted that I stop in that unsafe area by putting on his alarm (that god-awful sound that can no longer be called a "siren." I stopped and he stopped ten or so yards behind me.

He immediately got on his bull horn and instructed me to "remain in the vehicle." So, I remained, and I remained and I remained some more. This went on for at least 15 minutes (which seemed like an eternity). In the meantime, I retrieved a copy of the "Notice to the Government Functionary" (found at the bottom of The Police Contact) from behind the visor. I intended to present it to him at first opportunity.

As it turned out, it would be quite a while before I would get the opportunity. While we waited, he remained in a tactical over-watch position glaring at me through the obligatory (cool guy) sun glasses from behind the door of his vehicle while he talked on the radio. I suppose he (erroneously) thought that a vehicle door might offer some protection.

I sat with both hands out the window. I wanted to be sure that he could see I I was un-armed. He had already impressed me as the type that could find the slightest excuse to shoot someone. I held the "Notice" (a simple piece of white paper) in one hand.

Numerous times during the wait I would ask, "Am I under arrest?" No Response. "If I'm not under arrest, then please allow me to leave." No response. "Why are you detaining me?" No response. "You have already detained me much longer than you have the authority to do." No response.

By this time, another vehicle arrived. It was another property owner whom he also detained by not allowing them to pass (we had the narrow, unimproved, rural road blocked).

Finally, just like on TV, the infamous "back-up" arrived. Another State vehicle disgorged another uniformed agent—a kid that, I swear, if I saw him on the street I would guess his age to be between 14 and 16 years old.

Now embolden, the primary perpetrator got back on the bull horn. "Mr. LaBaume, please exit the vehicle."

I thought, 'how did he know my name? It couldn't be from running the plates because the vehicle I was driving belongs to a corporation to which I provide professional financial services. My name should not be associated with that particular vehicle in any public way. Could it be because of my open public stance on behalf of private property rights, free markets and the rule of law (which also applies to government functionaries)?

As I got out of the vehicle, it was just like on TV. He began to scream. LET ME SEE YOUR HANDS! LET ME SEE YOUR HANDS! DROP THE PAPER! (I interjected, "but you need to read what is on this paper." DROP THE PAPER! (So I dropped the paper.) PUT YOUR HANDS UP! HIGHER! TURN AROUND! TURN AROUND! PICK UP YOUR SHIRT! TURN AROUND! PICK UP YOUR UNDERSHIRT! (Obviously, he was looking for a gun. I didn't have a gun but I did have a knife, the end and pocket clip of which was clearly visible protruding from my front trouser pocket.) He didn't see it and continued. TURN BACK AROUND! SPREAD YOUR LEGS! MORE! SPREAD THEM MORE! PUT YOUR HANDS BEHIND YOUR BACK! BEND FORWARD! FURTHER! BEND FORWARD FURTHER! (By now I am about to fall on my nose in the rocks from the Chinese split position.) OPEN YOUR FINGERS.

Folks, if you have never been handcuffed by an armed agent of the State (the entity that murdered some 100 million people during the 20th century), you can take it from me—those cuffs make a distinctive sound when their jaws close. And he ratcheted them down tight—to the point that the indentions in my wrist did not disappear for several hours after being released. My wrists were bruised and sore the next morning.

Somewhere during the course of all of this, I had informed him that the contortions were hurting my old arthritic shoulders. I also complained about the tightness of the cuffs. I even accused him of "police brutality" but only jokingly—I knew already that, coming from an old white guy, it was to no avail.

STAND OVER THERE! Then the questioning began, initially taken up by the man-child "back-up." "Where is your ID?"

"I don't have one."

"You don't have a driver's license? Don't you know that you must have a driver's license to drive on the public's highways?"

"I wasn't driving on the 'public's' highways. My wife was driving up until we entered onto private property. You do realize that you are on private property, do you not?" No response.

In fact, the man-child must have been a hair smarter than the primary perpetrator. He shut up and retreated to the safety of the over-watch position behind the pick-up door. I couldn't get him to say another word—even when I asked him how old he was. Blank stare, straight ahead, eyes hidden by the obligatory (cool guy) sun glasses.

After I told them that I didn't have an ID, the primary perpetrator decided to pat me down. That is when he finally found the knife which he retrieved from my pocket and placed on the hood of his pick-up.

By now, additional "back-up" had arrived—a Terrell County Deputy Sheriff and yet another Game Warden.

So, let's review the scene. Here we are: a 65 year old, grey haired, arthritic, grand father (and veteran of a 35 year career in the Marine Corps, including two wars), spread eagled and cuffed and being screamed at like a violent criminal in front of his wife of 40 plus years (the mother of their three children and grand mother of their 8 grand children), and her little dog. God bless America.

This begs another question. The wife was asked a few questions (more on that below) but was never made to get out of the vehicle much less cuffed. If this guy thought I might be Clyde Barrow (which is how he treated me), what made him think Grandma wasn't Bonnie Parker (actually, the most dangerous half of the duo)? I don't think he did. I think his motive was pretty simple. Seeing himself as judge, jury and executioner, he was punishing me. The old guy had to be "spanked" for having the audacity to insist that his God given, constitutionally guaranteed human rights be respected.

Of course, separating the two "suspects" to see if their stories jive is a favorite tactic of these goons. Numerous times (at least three) during the questioning, the chief perpetrator would walk to our vehicle and talk to the wife. Upon his return from one of those visits, he referred to me as "Dr" LaBaume. I later asked her if she had told him that. She had not. Again, how did he know? Thinking about the answer is scary.

Grandma did a wonderful job of handling the situation—by pleading ignorance on most counts.

He had found a 357 magnum pistol in the driver's side pocket of the door panel. He removed, unloaded, and put it in his vehicle. He asked her if there were any more guns in the vehicle. She said she "had no idea" (there were at least three, one of which was easily within her reach had she been a "Bonnie Parker" type.)

He asked her why I didn't have my driver's license with me. She "had no idea."

He asked her if there was any reason why I wasn't driving on the public's roads. Her response was, "that's just how we always do it."

He asked her if she had a driver's license (obviously an effort to entrap me in the story that she had driven on the public's roads.) She said she did and handed it over when he asked to see it. (That was after he had referred to me as "Mr. LaBaume" so he could not have guessed that based on her license.) He took it and returned to his vehicle and apparently ran it.

Throughout all of this, I had repeatedly plead, "Please read what's on that piece of paper" (gesturing with my head toward the paper that still lay on the ground). Finally, after all these gyrations, he decided to pick it up. He and the man-child retreated to the rear of his vehicle and I could see them reading.

It was shortly after that that he returned the pistol and the ammo to my wife. Then, in a separate trip, he returned the knife the same way. All the time, I was still cuffed. He finally took the cuffs off. As soon as he did, I turned around, offered my hand and said, "I'm Jimmy LaBaume. What is your name?"

He told me and then made one last attempt to lecture me: "When a 'police officer' approaches you, you need to be cooperative and answer his questions."

"No, no, no, my man, you've got it backwards. You work for the citizenry. The citizenry does not work for you."

He accused me of having "acted aggressively toward him." I had not and I reminded him that I never made anything that could be interpreted as any sort of aggressive gesture. The absolute worst thing I might have done is use the adjective, "bleeping" to modify the noun "business" and I said that while walking AWAY from him and NOT toward him—as I would have had I intended to be "aggressive."

During this brief conversation, I placed my hands into my pockets. GET YOUR HANDS OUT OF YOUR POCKETS, he commanded.

"Damn dude, you've already searched me. You should know that I don't have anything in my pockets."

I'll swear, an IQ of at least 80 must be the standard for this job.

At that point, I attempted to take a quick inventory to see who had showed up and could, therefore, be held responsible at least for being an accomplice to the crime. But, I think you, dear reader, can understand how I might have been anxious to remove myself from that general area as quickly as possible.

As we were driving away, I glanced at my watch. It was 4:45 PM. I had been unlawfully detained for almost an hour—all because I told an agent of the state's Gestapo that where I was coming from was none of his business.

Anybody know a good Constitutional lawyer?

by

Dr Jimmy T (Gunny) LaBaume editor@flyoverpress.com www.flyoverpress.com

To Subscribe to our daily e-mail alert service, send an e-mail with the word "subscribe" on the subject line. FlyoverPress.com can be contacted at editor@flyoverpress.com


TOPICS: Government; Military/Veterans; Politics; Society
KEYWORDS: gunnyg; marines
by

Dr Jimmy T (Gunny) LaBaume editor@flyoverpress.com www.flyoverpress.com

Posted By Gunny G

1 posted on 11/10/2008 1:47:08 PM PST by gunnyg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: gunnyg

Happy Birthday, Marine!
233 and counting
Semper Fidelis
Dick Gaines
~~~~~~~~~~


2 posted on 11/10/2008 1:49:01 PM PST by gunnyg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gunnyg

3 posted on 11/10/2008 2:01:47 PM PST by Tony in Hawaii (NUTS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gunnyg

“I finished adjusting the seat and turned to walk around the back of my vehicle to close the passenger door so we could proceed to our destination. As I walked in front of the young man, he inquired, “Where are you coming from?” At that time I made the decision to invoke and refuse to waive all of my constitutional rights and privileges—including being forced to talk to a functionary of the state (See: The Police Contact). I informed him that where I was coming from was none of his “bleeping” business.”

I’m not LEO lover at all, but it sounds like to me that you elevated this situation from a casual question by the LEO to outright confrontation. Do you have chip on your shoulder?


4 posted on 11/10/2008 2:14:53 PM PST by caver (Yes, I did crawl out of a hole in the ground.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gunnyg

Most cops are losers, period. They are supposed to protect and serve, but all they do these days is raise funds for their cities or counties. They used to ride in traffic to keep people safe from speeding, but now they have undercover cars and they hide and sneak to catch people speeding to raise money. The seat belt laws are a joke designed to also raise money, because have you ever seen any school district required to have seat belts in all school buses? No, you haven’t because what good would it do to ticket the people they are raising money for.


5 posted on 11/10/2008 2:24:10 PM PST by freeplancer (McCain Voters Catch the Lobsters-Obama Voters Eat Them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: caver

Yeah, how dare a private citizen not kiss a cop’s ass on private property! Do you have $hit for brains?


6 posted on 11/10/2008 2:26:01 PM PST by freeplancer (McCain Voters Catch the Lobsters-Obama Voters Eat Them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: freeplancer

“Do you have $hit for brains?”

How about you fool? Is that the way to start off a discussion with a cop? This poster is supposedly an ex-military. He should know better than most people to respect authority.


7 posted on 11/10/2008 2:29:42 PM PST by caver (Yes, I did crawl out of a hole in the ground.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: caver
I’m not LEO lover at all, but it sounds like to me that you elevated this situation from a casual question by the LEO to outright confrontation. Do you have chip on your shoulder?

Yeah, I hate to say it, but I would have become suspicious in this situation, if I had been in the cop's shoes. This guy went from having a casual conversation to swearing at the LEO for no discernible reason. That would have got me thinking, too.

8 posted on 11/10/2008 2:31:11 PM PST by Citizen Blade (What would Ronald Reagan do?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: caver

What “authority” did a cop have on private property without a warrant of any kind? NONE. Respect does not equal being a lap dog. You must suffer from occasional or permanant power tripitis.


9 posted on 11/10/2008 2:33:44 PM PST by freeplancer (McCain Voters Catch the Lobsters-Obama Voters Eat Them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: freeplancer
Yeah, how dare a private citizen not kiss a cop’s ass on private property! Do you have $hit for brains?

Nobody says this guy had to kiss anyone's ass. But, AFAIK, the cop was being perfectly polite to this guy, but he just decided to start being rude.

And your post is no better. If you want to be treated seriously by adults, stop posting like a pissy teenager.

10 posted on 11/10/2008 2:34:27 PM PST by Citizen Blade (What would Ronald Reagan do?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Citizen Blade

Welcome to FR. Now our quota for people who don’t appreciate the importance and liberty of private property is filled.


11 posted on 11/10/2008 2:36:31 PM PST by freeplancer (McCain Voters Catch the Lobsters-Obama Voters Eat Them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: freeplancer
Welcome to FR. Now our quota for people who don’t appreciate the importance and liberty of private property is filled.

I'm a big fan of liberty and private property. But cops are trained to look for suspicious activity. And a guy who goes from a casual conversation to swearing at a LEO just shooting the breeze is going to make a cop nervous.

This dude is his own worst enemy- it seems like he's just looking for some sort of confrontation so he can cry victim.

12 posted on 11/10/2008 2:39:08 PM PST by Citizen Blade (What would Ronald Reagan do?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Citizen Blade

Last time I checked, it is not illegal to be rude on private property when you are not under arrest. I think I will come over to your house and trespass and cuff you if you if I think you are not being polite. You sheep kill me.


13 posted on 11/10/2008 2:39:24 PM PST by freeplancer (McCain Voters Catch the Lobsters-Obama Voters Eat Them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Citizen Blade

“cops are trained to look for suspicious activity”

Yeah, I am sure the legions of cops who only have a G.E.D.’s or HS Diplomas are secretly experts at thought detection. Everything you write is moot, BECAUSE IT WAS PRIVATE PROPERTY WITHOUT A WARRANT.


14 posted on 11/10/2008 2:42:24 PM PST by freeplancer (McCain Voters Catch the Lobsters-Obama Voters Eat Them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: freeplancer
Of course it's not illegal to be rude. But, we're getting only one side of the story. This guy claims that the police turned up out of nowhere. That doesn't make much sense.

I think I will come over to your house and trespass and cuff you if you if I think you are not being polite.

In situations where police feel threatened or are detaining someone, they do have the power to temporarily restrain a person and to search them for weapons. They do not need a warrant to exercise that power. The thing you seem to be missing is that this whole situation came about because this guy decided to become verbally abusive and belligerent. What's the point of that? How does he think a LEO is going to respond to someone who flies off like that out of the blue?

15 posted on 11/10/2008 2:44:26 PM PST by Citizen Blade (What would Ronald Reagan do?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: freeplancer

Been there, done that and spent the night in county jail and all I said was I did not care to indulge in casual conversation. The fact that in this incident it was a game warden, yes I know he is still a peace officer, still, the guy was on private property.


16 posted on 11/10/2008 2:45:03 PM PST by eastforker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: freeplancer
BECAUSE IT WAS PRIVATE PROPERTY WITHOUT A WARRANT.

That doesn't make a difference. Police powers to detain someone extend to private property and do not require a warrant. If a cop sees someone breaking into a house on private property, or observes someone removing drugs from a car on private property, they can go in and arrest them on the spot.

Or do you think that once you make it onto private property, you're immune to the law?

17 posted on 11/10/2008 2:48:19 PM PST by Citizen Blade (What would Ronald Reagan do?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Citizen Blade

First off, the LEO had no bussiness on private property unless he was investigating a crime already commited.The cop had no reason to even question the guy, but, too many sheep think we should just kneel and kiss the ring of government.


18 posted on 11/10/2008 2:50:52 PM PST by eastforker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Citizen Blade

Gee, weren’t we addressing this thread? This guy was not removing drugs from a car. Besides, how do you see that? Do all people that remove drugs from cars have brief cases that say “drugs” on them? Or are cops also trained in xray vision to see what is in people’s pockets?


19 posted on 11/10/2008 2:52:31 PM PST by freeplancer (McCain Voters Catch the Lobsters-Obama Voters Eat Them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: eastforker
First off, the LEO had no bussiness on private property unless he was investigating a crime already commited.

All we have is the word of this blogger that this is how events happened. His own words paint him as being slightly off. I'll take his side of the story with a grain of salt.

20 posted on 11/10/2008 2:54:57 PM PST by Citizen Blade (What would Ronald Reagan do?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: freeplancer
Gee, weren’t we addressing this thread? This guy was not removing drugs from a car.

I was addressing your point about private property and what powers police have to detain you on such property.

Besides, how do you see that? Do all people that remove drugs from cars have brief cases that say “drugs” on them? Or are cops also trained in xray vision to see what is in people’s pockets?

It was just an example to show that police can in fact arrest you on private property without a warrant.

I can't see that the police here did anything illegal. Can you?

21 posted on 11/10/2008 2:57:20 PM PST by Citizen Blade (What would Ronald Reagan do?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Citizen Blade

Crime in progress vs “no reason” are two very different things.


22 posted on 11/10/2008 3:02:47 PM PST by Sacajaweau (I'm planting corn...Have to feed my car...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: caver
He should know better than most people to respect authority.

You mean the authority that allows in, winks and nods and publicly encourages tens of millions to enter this country illegally, and then cry when they get little respect?

While these agents of the state harassed and detained this man and his wife, that were not breaking any law, there were probably 10 crimes being committed within 30 miles distance, and 2000 more illegal aliens walking across the Texas Mexican border, laughing all the way.

We've got upwards of 40 million in this country illegally, and we are supposed to have respect for law enforcement?

Get real.

23 posted on 11/10/2008 3:06:24 PM PST by dragnet2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: gunnyg
on numerous occassions i have approached people in the course of my duties and inquired as to their activities.

if they were not compelled to answer, said nothing, or walked away, that was their right. most of the time i simply want them to move along anyway. but that's how it goes here in NYC.

that being said, this guy's attitude can take a hike. if he had simply said, "officer, no offense, but i am on private property and unless you have reasonable suspicion that my wife or i have committed a crime i would prefer not to answer any of your questions" he would have gotten a big "so long, sir" from me.

yeah this "officer" seems like a tool, but common courtesy should be extended to everyone, cop or otherwise. sounds like this ol gunny needs a lesson in manners. i bet he's a real hit at parties.

24 posted on 11/10/2008 3:27:28 PM PST by thefactor (yes, as a matter of fact, i DID only read the excerpt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freeplancer

“What “authority” did a cop have on private property without a warrant of any kind? NONE.”

An OPEN DOOR.

“... we stopped just inside the gate to switch drivers... We had not yet shut and locked the gate.”

Nest time SHUT AND LOCK THE GATE before undertaking all of those other activities. Then the cop could not have come in.


25 posted on 11/10/2008 3:29:15 PM PST by Pikachu_Dad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: dragnet2

jeez, i bet if the car was full of illegals and the officer stopped them and locked them up even though there were no outward signs of criminality, you’d be applauding this scenario.


26 posted on 11/10/2008 3:37:27 PM PST by thefactor (yes, as a matter of fact, i DID only read the excerpt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: thefactor

Yeah right, let`s get all those unPC folks out there if and when they fail to suckup!

Could it be that he`d put up with this crap on previous occasions in like situations on private property and having committed no offense?

No matter, ol gunnys are fair game for the PC (for oneself) crowd—so the `frustrated cashiers` can play crimefighter in some fashion after all.

Ya can shock the sh!t troops
But ya cannot sh!t the shock troops

Have a nice day, citizen.


27 posted on 11/10/2008 4:02:15 PM PST by gunnyg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: caver
He should know better than most people to respect authority.

According to the Consitution the officer was a "guest".

As a citizen you have no obligation to "entertain" him without a warrant from a judge.

28 posted on 11/10/2008 4:03:25 PM PST by Right Brigade
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: caver
it sounds like to me that you elevated this situation from a casual question by the LEO to outright confrontation. Do you have chip on your shoulder?

does it matter? I missed it, what was the reason he was pulled over?

29 posted on 11/10/2008 4:12:59 PM PST by Hot Tabasco (Gonna be a party in the White House Crib)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Citizen Blade
This dude is his own worst enemy- it seems like he's just looking for some sort of confrontation so he can cry victim.

I'm still trying to figure out why he was stopped in the first place. Can you help me out here?

30 posted on 11/10/2008 4:17:02 PM PST by Hot Tabasco (Gonna be a party in the White House Crib)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Citizen Blade
That doesn't make a difference. Police powers to detain someone extend to private property and do not require a warrant. If a cop sees someone breaking into a house on private property, or observes someone removing drugs from a car on private property, they can go in and arrest them on the spot. Or do you think that once you make it onto private property, you're immune to the law?

A dog copping a squat is not an offense in the boondocks. why would a LEO even bother to stop?

Are you a CITIZEN or a COMARADE.

31 posted on 11/10/2008 4:18:25 PM PST by Right Brigade
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Citizen Blade
The thing you seem to be missing is that this whole situation came about because this guy decided to become verbally abusive and belligerent

Actually, the thing YOU are missing is why this guy was pulled over on private property to begin with.........

LEO's are not Gods and thus do not require to be treated as such. If I happen to have an attitude because some LEO usurps his authority and pulls me over, that does not give him the right to abuse his authority simply because I start to get pissed at his own attitude.........

32 posted on 11/10/2008 4:23:57 PM PST by Hot Tabasco (Gonna be a party in the White House Crib)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: thefactor
sounds like this ol gunny needs a lesson in manners. i bet he's a real hit at parties.

manners go a long way in a polite society.

Obviously the guy is an idiot but no criminal.

33 posted on 11/10/2008 4:31:27 PM PST by Right Brigade
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Pikachu_Dad

Private propert is not defined as property with a closed gate. People like you will fit right into a police state. You are scary.


34 posted on 11/10/2008 6:07:25 PM PST by freeplancer (McCain Voters Catch the Lobsters-Obama Voters Eat Them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: freeplancer

“What “authority” did a cop have on private property without a warrant of any kind? NONE. Respect does not equal being a lap dog. You must suffer from occasional or permanant power tripitis.”

The “private property” sounds like a commonlly owned subdivision. I don’t think that is the same thing as property owned exclusively by one person.

Respect is a two way street. Maybe the guy should have started out with some respect instead of going full tilt. By his own description, the cop only asked a question and he came back belligerent.


35 posted on 11/10/2008 6:31:12 PM PST by caver (Yes, I did crawl out of a hole in the ground.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: dragnet2

“You mean the authority that allows in, winks and nods and publicly encourages tens of millions to enter this country illegally, and then cry when they get little respect?

While these agents of the state harassed and detained this man and his wife, that were not breaking any law, there were probably 10 crimes being committed within 30 miles distance, and 2000 more illegal aliens walking across the Texas Mexican border, laughing all the way.

We’ve got upwards of 40 million in this country illegally, and we are supposed to have respect for law enforcement?

Get real.”

It sounds like you are talking about illegal immigration. I think you are on the wrong thread.


36 posted on 11/10/2008 6:32:55 PM PST by caver (Yes, I did crawl out of a hole in the ground.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Hot Tabasco

“does it matter? I missed it, what was the reason he was pulled over?”

He wasn’t pulled over. The guy was already stopped.


37 posted on 11/10/2008 6:34:17 PM PST by caver (Yes, I did crawl out of a hole in the ground.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: gunnyg
"I informed him that where I was coming from was none of his "bleeping" business."

The man qualifies for the anal orifice of the year award.

38 posted on 11/10/2008 6:35:30 PM PST by verity ("Lord, what fools we mortals be!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freeplancer

“Private property is not defined as property with a closed gate. People like you will fit right into a police state. You are scary.”

Rubbish.

If you don’t secure your private property, trouble will walk in uninvited.

He should have closed his gate.


39 posted on 11/10/2008 6:44:05 PM PST by Pikachu_Dad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Pikachu_Dad

You are not even American, so shut up.


40 posted on 11/10/2008 7:19:13 PM PST by freeplancer (McCain Voters Catch the Lobsters-Obama Voters Eat Them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: gunnyg
dude, WHAT?!?

congrats on the most nonsensical musing i have ever seen on this here site.

must be a generational thing. in my experience, anyone out there looking for a fight will no doubt find one. just like those code pink/ACLU freaks who go searching to be offended. they usually find what they are looking for as well.

41 posted on 11/10/2008 7:23:36 PM PST by thefactor (yes, as a matter of fact, i DID only read the excerpt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: verity

“The man qualifies for the anal orifice of the year award. “

His defenders on here get the runner up awards.


42 posted on 11/10/2008 8:00:41 PM PST by Pikachu_Dad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: freeplancer

“You are not even American, so shut up.”

YES, I AM.


43 posted on 11/10/2008 8:01:37 PM PST by Pikachu_Dad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: caver
Oh that's right slick, criminals and people who break the law are not a law enforcement issue..

WTF was I thinking?

44 posted on 11/10/2008 10:39:23 PM PST by dragnet2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: dragnet2

“WTF was I thinking?”

I don’t know, but you’re having a problem staying focused on this topic.


45 posted on 11/11/2008 2:19:52 AM PST by caver (Yes, I did crawl out of a hole in the ground.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Hot Tabasco
I'm still trying to figure out why he was stopped in the first place. Can you help me out here?

No clue. Kind of makes me think we're not getting the full story here.

46 posted on 11/11/2008 8:46:34 AM PST by Citizen Blade (What would Ronald Reagan do?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: caver

Try sticking your head a little further into the sand to avoid unpleasant thoughts.


47 posted on 11/11/2008 2:47:02 PM PST by dragnet2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: thefactor
i bet if the car was full of illegals and the officer stopped them and locked them up even though there were no outward signs of criminality, you’d be applauding this scenario.

Lets examine that statement. So if a LEO pulls over a car full of illegals, the illegals will 99 percent of the time will have no drivers license, no current registration, no valid vehicle insurance etc. No crime?

48 posted on 11/11/2008 6:37:05 PM PST by dragnet2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: dragnet2
but that's the whole point!

an officer does not need a reason to ask questions. sometimes they are not entitled to an answer, but that is beyond my point.

if an officer pulls over a car for a traffic infraction, the officer has observed a violation and can therefore detain the driver and require proper ID.

in this case, there was no traffic stop and no observed violation. so the "gunny" was not required to answer any questions. it would have been nice if he had been a decent guy, but it's everybody's right to be a total a$$hole.

as for the illegals, the officer has no way of knowing who is illegal or not at the time of deciding to make a stop. so maybe we should allow a couple stops of law-abiding citizens in order to proactively search out criminals.

49 posted on 11/11/2008 7:00:14 PM PST by thefactor (yes, as a matter of fact, i DID only read the excerpt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: thefactor
as for the illegals, the officer has no way of knowing who is illegal or not at the time of deciding to make a stop.

You have missed my point. I was not referring to a specific traffic stop. I initially responded to the other poster above that stated:

"He should know better than most people to respect authority.

I responded:

You mean the authority that allows in, winks and nods and publicly encourages tens of millions to enter this country illegally, and then cry when they get little respect?

While these agents of the state harassed and detained this man and his wife, that were not breaking any laws, there were probably 10 crimes being committed within 30 miles distance, and 2000 more illegal aliens walking across the Texas Mexican border, laughing all the way.

We've got upwards of 40 million in this country illegally, and we are supposed to have respect for law enforcement?

You see when Americans are surrounded by lawlessness, aided and abetted by their own government, while being forced at gun point to subsidize this government sponsored lawlessness, well there is will be little respect left for government or law enforcement.

This is not a difficult concept as to why more and more people have little or no respect for law enforcement. It's completely justifiable and understandable.

50 posted on 11/11/2008 7:58:42 PM PST by dragnet2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson