Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Christianists Ramp Up Obama Birth Certificate Attacks
Joe.my.god ^ | Poofer

Posted on 11/26/2008 9:36:13 AM PST by pissant

The right-wing just won't let go of their "Barack Obama is not a U.S. citizen" bit of nonsense. Today the Christiantist site World Net Daily is asking their readers to FedEx letters to the Supreme Court demanding they hold a hearing on the subject. They also want letters sent to Republican members of Congress saying, "Please hold congressional hearings to investigate whether Barack Obama meets the basic constitutional requirements for the highest office of the land."

They are also demanding that the members of the Electoral College prove Obama's citizenship before their December 15th vote that will officially make him president:

-----------------------

A one-time vice presidential candidate who is considered an expert on the U.S. Constitution says it is up the electors from the 50 states to make certain President-elect Barack Obama is a natural-born U.S. citizen before they cast votes for him in the Electoral College Dec. 15. If they do their duty, they would make sure that if they cast a vote for Mr. Obama, that Mr. Obama is a natural-born citizen," Herb Titus, the Constitution Party's running mate to Howard Phillips in 1996, told WND today.

(Excerpt) Read more at joemygod.blogspot.com ...


TOPICS: Chit/Chat
KEYWORDS: antichristian; bigot; birthcertificate; celebratesin; certifigate; conspiracytheory; crackpot; dnctalkingpoints; gaystapotactics; hedonist; homosexualagenda; ifitfeelsgooddohim; larrysinclairslover; lavendermafia; liberalbigot; missingbirthcert; moonbat; obama; religiousintolerance; sodomite; woowoo
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-73 next last
Must be an Andy Sullivan fellow traveler. Looks like one too.
1 posted on 11/26/2008 9:36:13 AM PST by pissant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: pissant

The real question is, what your doing on this guy’s website in the first place? Yuck


2 posted on 11/26/2008 9:39:06 AM PST by freeplancer (McCain Voters Catch the Lobsters-Obama Voters Eat Them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pissant
They are also demanding that the members of the Electoral College prove Obama's citizenship before their December 15th vote that will officially make him president:

That, of course, would be a disaster. The Democrat electors would still get to vote on December 15th, and they would elect Hillary Rodham Clinton. And anybody who thinks that Mrs. Clinton would be preferable to President-elect Obama needs his or her head examined.

3 posted on 11/26/2008 9:39:47 AM PST by presidio9 (I don't want to live in a world where Mike Mussina is a Hall of Famer.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pissant

I guess you want to make America into a taliban style dictatorship (but with Christianity-which is totally different than Islam) if ALL you want to do is FOLLOW the Constitution: I think it’s the left that won’t “give up” the extremism, not us.


4 posted on 11/26/2008 9:39:57 AM PST by JSDude1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pissant

‘Christianist’? New to me......


5 posted on 11/26/2008 9:40:43 AM PST by vimto (To do the right thing you don't have to be intelligent - you have to be brave (Sasz))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pissant

Apparently Phillip Berg has converted to “Christianist”.

Interestingly enough the squealing of the left is growing noticably louder. I’m thinking they’re worried.


6 posted on 11/26/2008 9:40:52 AM PST by cripplecreek (The poor bastards have us surrounded.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pissant
"Christianist"

"With all this talk of the word "Christianist," I thought I'd do a Lexis/Nexis search to see how often it appears. In the Law Reviews & Journals database, "Christianist" (or "Christianists") is used only once, in an article by Robert J. Morris called "Intersections: Sexuality, Cultural Tradition, and the Law: Configuring the Bo(u)nds of Marriage: The Implications of Hawaiian Culture & Values for the Debate About Homogamy," 8 Yale J.L. & Human. 105 (1996)("Homogamy"? That's new to me.)"

More info at - http://althouse.blogspot.com/2006/11/christianist.html

7 posted on 11/26/2008 9:41:19 AM PST by BossLady (Ok Everybody......Get Ready For ......'THE MOOD RING PRESIDENCY'......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pissant

The right-wing just won’t let go of their “Barack Obama is not a U.S. citizen” bit of nonsense

Since they can’t produce a legit COLB they will go to the dem playbook of demonizing the opponent. It’s just an unproveable right-wing attack!


8 posted on 11/26/2008 9:41:49 AM PST by rj45mis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: presidio9

Clinton is far preferable to me.


9 posted on 11/26/2008 9:41:58 AM PST by pissant (THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: pissant

The use of the term *Christianist* denotes a severe brain dysfunction.

;-)


10 posted on 11/26/2008 9:42:03 AM PST by SumProVita (Cogito, ergo...Sum Pro Vita. (Modified DeCartes))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pissant
Image and video hosting by TinyPic
11 posted on 11/26/2008 9:42:32 AM PST by frogjerk (Welcome|Goodbye to|from Free|Fairness Doctrine Republic!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BossLady

Fags are the only ones who use it. Like the Andrew “Loafers” Sullivan.


12 posted on 11/26/2008 9:43:05 AM PST by pissant (THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: presidio9
And anybody who thinks that Mrs. Clinton would be preferable to President-elect Obama needs his or her head examined.

Do I need my head examined for expecting the 2nd amendment to be upheld too?
13 posted on 11/26/2008 9:43:15 AM PST by cripplecreek (The poor bastards have us surrounded.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: BossLady

see my post #11


14 posted on 11/26/2008 9:43:29 AM PST by frogjerk (Welcome|Goodbye to|from Free|Fairness Doctrine Republic!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: vimto

BREAKING: People in pants Ramp Up Obama Birth Certificate Attacks...


15 posted on 11/26/2008 9:43:47 AM PST by MaxMax (I'll welcome death when God calls me. Until then, the fight is on)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: pissant

I sort of agree, at least she won’t sell our country down the river as fast as Obama. She would probably be a lot tough internationally.


16 posted on 11/26/2008 9:45:30 AM PST by east1234 (It's the borders stupid! My new enviromentalist inspired tagline: cut, kill, dig and drill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: pissant
What is the difference between a Christian and a Christianist?

Are Christianists baptized, unlike a Christian like, say.... Obama?

17 posted on 11/26/2008 9:45:40 AM PST by weegee (Sec. of State Clinton. What kind of change is it to keep the Bush-Clinton-Bush-Clinton Oligarchy?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: vimto

It’s a namecalling technique to marginalize anyone with a different opinion.

That’s fine - as long as they don’t mind being called

Obamunists

for the next 4 years.


18 posted on 11/26/2008 9:45:43 AM PST by MrB (The 0bamanation: Marxism, Infanticide, Appeasement, Depression, Thuggery, and Censorship)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

I don't know what a "Christianist" is, but I do know that Obama needs to prove behond a shadow of doubt; verified by impartial experts, that he is a Natural Born Citizen.

This story is not going away until this is proven.....

19 posted on 11/26/2008 9:45:55 AM PST by NoRedTape
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: SumProVita

The use of the term *Christianist* denotes a severe brain dysfunction.

;-)

_____________________________________
It’s used in a derogatory way. Check out this troll site and you’ll understand. They HATE Christians and just ‘take the piss’.

http://truechristiansunite.yuku.com/

They are trying to be ‘Landover Baptist’.


20 posted on 11/26/2008 9:47:19 AM PST by RushIsMyTeddyBear
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: presidio9
That, of course, would be a disaster. The Democrat electors would still get to vote on December 15th, and they would elect Hillary Rodham Clinton. And anybody who thinks that Mrs. Clinton would be preferable to President-elect Obama needs his or her head examined.

Well yes, but at least she would be legal. And we could always say she was selected, not elected.

21 posted on 11/26/2008 9:48:41 AM PST by DouglasKC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: pissant
Clinton is far preferable to me.

All evidence points to Clinton being a terrible person. The same sort of evidenc points to Obama being a generally good person who is young naive and confused. Only a racist could prefer Clinton to Obama.

22 posted on 11/26/2008 9:49:21 AM PST by presidio9 (I don't want to live in a world where Mike Mussina is a Hall of Famer.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: presidio9

Only a racist liberal would think only a racist could prefer Hillary to Obama. Hillary may be the worst hag in the world and she’d still be preferable to the lying marxist racist POS.


23 posted on 11/26/2008 9:52:07 AM PST by pissant (THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: frogjerk
I was quoting a blog....thought it was interesting that it is a combo of Christian and capitalist in this article Althouse found from 1996 by Robert J. Morris. Yet....

The usage is noted in a William Safire "On Language" column on May 15, 2005:

"Two weeks after writing about the fervor of the late Terri Schiavo's ''Christianist 'supporters,''' Hendrik Hertzberg of The New Yorker last month described Representative Tom Delay as a ''hard-right Christianist crusader.'' A few months before, soon after President Bush was re-elected, the conservative Weekly Standard reported that an Ohio cartoonist had sent out a communication deploring ''militant Christianist Republicans.''

So apparently, you can use the term as you see fit.... ;)

24 posted on 11/26/2008 9:52:48 AM PST by BossLady (Ok Everybody......Get Ready For ......'THE MOOD RING PRESIDENCY'......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: pissant

“Today the Christiantist site World Net Daily “

uhm. Christianist. right.

that aside, don’t ever get added to world net daily’s email list. I have NO idea how I got on their list for every SINGLE email I have, but getting off is like cancelling AOL.

for crying out loud, leave me ALONE !


25 posted on 11/26/2008 9:54:02 AM PST by stompk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pissant
The right-wing just won't let go of their "Barack Obama is not a U.S. citizen" bit of nonsense

Sure we will, show us a valid birth certificate, it is that simple.

26 posted on 11/26/2008 9:54:37 AM PST by SFR
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: presidio9

“Only a racist could prefer Clinton to Obama”

did you forget your sarcasm tag ?

ps. the word “racist” to me now has come to mean “someone I disagree with but can’t reason my way to a win”


27 posted on 11/26/2008 9:57:23 AM PST by stompk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: pissant
There is only one rational explanation for why Obama had to date refused to make public his authenticated Birth Certificate.... He is hiding SOMETHING..

What could it be?

- His slut of a mother lied about who his father was.
- He birthplace would render him ineligible for the Presidency.
- ?????

If Obama is permitted to be inaugurated - without PROOF of natural born citizenship — then the DNC has shown once again their contempt for the Constitution and the rule of law....

28 posted on 11/26/2008 9:57:38 AM PST by river rat (Semper Fi - You may turn the other cheek, but I prefer to look into my enemy's vacant dead eyes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: east1234
Begging your pardon, She has helped in this endeavor of helping to elect someone not eligible to be POTUS.

Clinton's machine was out matched and she has not said a word about his legitimacy or not.p> She is very quiet on this because he could hurt her chances of being appointed to the USSC. She don't want no Sec of State crap, she wants to be a USSC judge for life.

29 posted on 11/26/2008 9:58:14 AM PST by Rapunzel (Never forget Fallujah..S. Helvenston RIP.....Sarah...Sarah...Sarah loves America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: weegee
A "Christianist" (a new word - not in any dictionary) is someone who allows their Christian religion to influence their political decisions as opposed to a secularist who allows their lack of religion to influence their political decisions.

WorldNetDaily is also a forum for non-leftist Jews - therefore, are they "Jewists" or "Jewishists"?

30 posted on 11/26/2008 10:02:20 AM PST by reg45
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: pissant
Clinton is far preferable to me

Why is that? He's more of a narcissist than she is, that makes him potentially easier to influence.. IMO, she's a nasty lesbian-friendly ideologue, with laser like focus on all thats near and dear to the gender class warfare crowd.

31 posted on 11/26/2008 10:04:41 AM PST by Nonstatist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: pissant
"Joe.my.god"
 
Interesting URL.
 
Rainbow / Satanic Doctrine's focus is upon worshiping and indulging the self.
 
 
Christian Doctrine's focus is upon worshiping God and sacrificing the self - being reborn daily via Christ's sacrifice.
 
 
 

32 posted on 11/26/2008 10:05:33 AM PST by LomanBill (A bird flies because the right wing opposes the left.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: river rat
...the DNC has shown once again their contempt for the Constitution and the rule of law....

That was sealed into fact forever with the Clinton senate impeachment vote. Nothing new here!

33 posted on 11/26/2008 10:05:42 AM PST by JimRed ("Hey, hey, Teddy K., how many girls did you drown today?" TERM LIMITS, NOW AND FOREVER!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: presidio9

Since Obama’s campaign was one of three in his career that has taken advantage of the fact that the racial pump was primed by those who came before him and by his selection of his black self to represent his whole self, it is hardly likely that future historians will ignore this obvious characteristic.

If one thing has come out of this exercise in mountain-climbing by the molehill builders involved, it will be the the realization that the wisdom of the ages as it pertains to the futility of high-expectations will be proved immutable once again.

When the ranks of the typical black families catch on to what is truly happening here maybe even they will give up their love affair with this quite charming but insincere man.


34 posted on 11/26/2008 10:06:40 AM PST by Old Professer (The critic writes with rapier pen, dips it twice, then writes again.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: presidio9
Only a racist could prefer Clinton to Obama.

Did you you mean that insult seriously? If so it is a shameful remark and you owe an apology.

Herding yourself along with the Liberals as they play the race card does a terrible disservice to this conservative forum and, by extension, to America. You ought to instantly withdraw that calumny.


35 posted on 11/26/2008 10:08:41 AM PST by nathanbedford ("Attack, repeat attack!" Bull Halsey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: pissant

Stupid Christians ... we’re always behind the PC times, and now we haven’t grown up enough to know the Constitutional requirements for president are obsolete. Stupid Christianists, we ...


36 posted on 11/26/2008 10:09:30 AM PST by MHGinTN (Believing they cannot be deceived, they cannot be convinced when they are deceived.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: presidio9

Hillary’s running the show now anyway. Eclair’s cabinet is a bunch of Clintonistas. You didn’t think that Harlem meeting in early fall was simply a smoking session, do you?


37 posted on 11/26/2008 10:09:33 AM PST by prismsinc (AIP works for ME!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: pissant

When a guy uses the term “Christiantist” its a sign that he is clueless.


38 posted on 11/26/2008 10:16:08 AM PST by ckilmer (Phi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: presidio9
Obama being a generally good person who is young naive and confused.

Geez, sounds like youre describing yourself. He's neither all that young or "naive". He's known what he wanted since he was 8 yrs old (ask Hitlery). All those "present" votes, establishing himself in Chicago with all the race pimps and their biggest advocates, the affirmative action appt to Harvard Law review and so on. Engineered with one thing in mind.

What we need is a Conservative Congress to keep him in check, which unfortunately Bush almost went out of his way to make sure we wouldnt have.

39 posted on 11/26/2008 10:16:40 AM PST by Nonstatist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: freeplancer

By using the term “Christianist” they’re striking back at those who call the One a socialist or stalinist.


40 posted on 11/26/2008 10:20:55 AM PST by Terry Mross
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: pissant

On July 25th, 1787, John Jay wrote to George Washington, then Presiding Officer of the Constitutional Convention:

"“Permit me to hint, whether it would be wise and seasonable to provide a strong check to the admission of Foreigners into the administration of our national Government; and to declare expressly that the Commander in Chief of the American Army shall not be given to nor devolve on, any but a natural born Citizen.”

The Convention agreed and without debate the provision suggested by Jay was written into the Constitution.

That Jay’s advice was taken is not surprising because in his career Jay was President of the Continental Congress, Chief Justice of the New York Supreme Court, 1st Chief Justice of the United States, Ambassador to Spain and France, Secretary of Foreign Affairs (Secretary of State) and Governor of New York, among other things. He wasn’t a man whose advice could be ignored. Note that what particularly concerned Jay was not a political issue but a military issue arising because the President is Commander in Chief of the Armed Forces of the United States. He was bothered by issues of National Security."

41 posted on 11/26/2008 10:22:42 AM PST by Diogenesis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek
Do I need my head examined for expecting the 2nd amendment to be upheld too?

If you can see a big difference in the private gun ownership policies of Clinton vs. Obama, sure, I'd like to examine your head. You're seeing things the rest of us don't.

If you were referring to Article II of the Constitution, then no, you don't need your head examined for expecting that it be upheld except that it's as stupid rule. It's original intent was liberal creep Thomas Jefferson's desire to prevent the co-founder of American Conservativism, Alexander Hamilton, from becoming President. Jefferson wasn't a "natural born citizen" either, as the United States only came into existence after the ratification of the document.

Meanwhile, had he been elected, John McCain WOULD have been eligible, despite the fact that he, too, was not a natural born citizen under the letter of the law. This was due to a supreme court ruling, and not an amendment to the Constitution. In other words, the original concept was flawed, and the entire process has become outdated.

Barak Obama is clearly not the udeal example of a US citizen, but he's the one we elected.

42 posted on 11/26/2008 10:34:18 AM PST by presidio9 (I don't want to live in a world where Mike Mussina is a Hall of Famer.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: pissant

What is a “Christiantist” and why are the “Christiantists” the only ones concerned with preserving the Constitution? I’d like to sign up. Sounds like more look-mom-i-can-type-on-the-internet liberal blogging to me. Oh well ... no press on the issue is bad press.


43 posted on 11/26/2008 10:35:50 AM PST by so_real
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pissant
Must be an Andy Sullivan fellow traveler. Looks like one too.

I guess that makes him a penist, then.

44 posted on 11/26/2008 10:38:38 AM PST by RegulatorCountry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pissant

I’ve recently run across some interesting information concerning the O’s COLB and his BS issue. They are:

1. There are NO hospital records of his mother being admitted to have a baby during the time period of O’s virgin birth.

2. The O wrote in one of his books about his birth certificate decribing it in detail.

3. His almost daily press CONferences.

Number 2 struck me as odd unless you consider he knows there is an issue and he wants to address spin it early in an attempt to get some cover.

And when you notice his recent behaviour of trying to appear as if he is already running the country it may be an attwmpt to pressure to court to not rule against him.

And I hope the SCOTUS is not affected by a bunch of letters in ruling o an issue. Mob rule is very unsightly.

If SCOTUS fails to rule according the constitution there will be only one way remaining to secure our country.


45 posted on 11/26/2008 10:38:50 AM PST by stockpirate (Compassionate Conservatism = Republican Socialism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pissant
Hillary may be the worst hag in the world and she’d still be preferable to the lying marxist racist POS.

Generally, I respect what you have to say on FR, so I am repeating this statement for you so that you can identify the stupidity of suggesting that HRC is anything but a the lying marxist racist POS.

46 posted on 11/26/2008 10:41:59 AM PST by presidio9 (I don't want to live in a world where Mike Mussina is a Hall of Famer.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: stompk
Do I need my head examined for expecting the 2nd amendment to be upheld too?

No, in this case the word "racist" refers to two corrupt politicians who have (in the words of Mark Levin) "not a dime's worth of difference between the two of them politically."

There are only three obvious differences between Clinton and Obama: One got elected, one did not. One's a man, and one is a woman. One is black, one is white. Perhaps you can think of another. I can not. Thus, the only valid reasons for preferring one to the other are either sexism or racism.

Would you care to list some of HRC's qualities that make her preferrable to Obama?

47 posted on 11/26/2008 10:44:17 AM PST by presidio9 (I don't want to live in a world where Mike Mussina is a Hall of Famer.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: pissant

I learned a long time ago, that when someone tells you you’re stupid for asking a question, when they could easily answer it, you should keep asking till you get an answer.

Sometimes they were right, it was a stupid question.

More often than not, though, it wasn’t the question that was stupid; it was the answer they didn’t want to discuss.

If you ask about Obama’s citizenship, and rather than simply answer the question he sends his lawyers to fight you and his propagandists to insult you, you should probably keep asking until you get an answer. Everything about the way he responds tells me he doesn’t want to discuss it, and that tells me there is a reason. His reason may be something other than the reason I suspect, but there is a reason he doesn’t want to discuss it.


48 posted on 11/26/2008 10:52:43 AM PST by marron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nathanbedford

Read the whole thread, and tell me if you think you still understand what it is that I’m trying to say.

My point is this: I don’t like Obama, but I hated Clinton, and her character and her politics, and her pantsuits before I had ever even heard of the man. All of a sudden Hillary Clinton is looking better to a lot of people around here, and I’m just sort of scratching my about it. The woman is pure evil.


49 posted on 11/26/2008 11:01:23 AM PST by presidio9 (I don't want to live in a world where Mike Mussina is a Hall of Famer.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: presidio9

I would rather Hillary. At least she is a citizen and loves America.


50 posted on 11/26/2008 11:09:35 AM PST by napscoordinator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-73 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson