Posted on 12/02/2008 4:57:38 AM PST by Calpernia
Doubtful, based on my understanding of what constitutes legal standing to sue. But we'll see.
Maybe he is natural born but is only 34 years old.
I think it’s more of the fear from being vilified and “held responsible” for starting a mini or even full-scale civil war in case obama is disqualified.
‘There are cases coming where EC Electors are the plaintiffs. If anyone is to have standing it is them.
Doubtful, based on my understanding of what constitutes legal standing to sue. But we’ll see.’
In the Keyes case he was an actual candidate on the ballot and has better standing than other cases.
Each state law on standing is different of course but some of these electors are Republican in states where Obama won. They were deprived of their ability to vote based on fraudulence.
Sweet.
As the article mentions... a heartfelt thanks to all those working hard to expose the truth.
Someone said that Strunk had been mispelled???????
http://www.rallycongress.com/constitutional-qualification/1244
This evidence will not go away, ever.
I agree. People can say the SCOTUS Justices are toadies but I have faith in Thomas, Scalia, Alito and Roberts. O is a fraud and if I were Roberts I would make sure before I swore him in.
In order to establish standing, Keyes still has to show an injury in fact that is real and concrete, not hypothetical or conjectural. So if Obama is in fact unqualified, how does that cause Keyes damage? That's the hurdle that all these cases are having problems surmounting.
Soap Box
Ballot Box
Jury (Court) Box
Ammo Box
IF SC skips, that's three boxes down. Which would really be a damn shame. Most people want to live by the rules, but what can one do when the rules are rendered irrelevant by our 'leaders' in Washington??
According to Taitz/Kreep, they claim that Keyes and his list of Electors have standing under CA law. Every state law is different, there is no universal ‘law of standing’ across 50 states. These cases are being filed against Secretaries of States under state laws.
You didn’t respond to part about the McCain Electors having been harmed in states where Obama won. Under some state laws such as my state of NY, those Electors don’t have standing. But under other state laws they do.
And what harm did they suffer?
Is there any such thing as treason today?
SCOTUS UPDATES for Dec 2, 2008: CORT WROTNOWSKI HAND DELIVERS EMERGENCY APPLICATION - DONOFRIO LETTER REGARDING NJ JUDGE MISCONDUCT HITS DOCKET
Posted in Uncategorized on December 2, 2008 by naturalborncitizen
[UPDATE 3:12 pm]
Cort’s Docket now shows that the renewed application to Justice Scalia is dated Nov. 29. That’s the date Cort express mailed the original papers. We don’t know if they’ve passed the original papers on or if they used the new papers submitted in person today by Cort. If they used the old papers, then why was Cort told yesterday it would take seven days? Perhaps they used the new papers with the original date of filing. We don’t know.
[UPDATE 2:44pm] - Cort’s docket has been updated at SCOTUS. The application has been “refiled and submitted to Justice Scalia”.
SCOTUS UPDATES for December 2, 2008: CORT WROTNOWSKI HAND DELIVERS EMERGENCY APPLICATION - DONOFRIO LETTER REGARDING NJ JUDGE MISCONDUCT HITS DOCKET
Cort Wrotnowski, (SCOTUS Docket No. 08A469) a day after facing the shock of his life when told by a SCOTUS clerk that his renewed application to Justice Scalia would be held back for 7 days due to anthrax screening, hand delivered 10 copies of his renewed application to the Security booth at SCOTUS this morning at 10:30 AM. Cort was told by the Clerk’s office that the papers would “probably” be in the Clerk’s office by 2:00 PM. Cort’s application, according to Supreme Court Rule 22.1, should be “transmitted promptly” to the Honorable Associate Justice Antonin Scalia. Keep your eyes on that Docket to see if they will follow the Rules of Court.
In my case, SCOTUS Docket No. 08A407, Donofrio v. Wells, the docket has been updated to include the letter I sent to all nine Justices which included copies of official Judicial Misconduct allegations against the New Jersey Judge who handled my initial NJ Appellate Division case. This is important because the letter made clear that should the SCOTUS request an official copy of the case file from the lower court, the file on record there is fraudulent.
It’s significant to note that I sent this letter directly to the nine Justices. While I did send a copy to the Clerk of the Court, the copies I sent to Justices went directly to them without asking the Clerk to distribute them. Since this was not an official pleading, I wasn’t required to go through the Clerk’s office. The letter was sent on November 22, 2008 but has only just hit the Docket today, December 2, 2008. I didn’t think this letter would become part of the Docket. I expect members of the press might be able to find out what this means. Nobody in the Clerk’s office will take my calls.
I’m sorry, I think you have been asking for that link for 2 days. I am not ignoring you, just overwhelmed.
I remember seeing the website you are specifically asking for; but I didn’t bookmark it. This blog seems to have the information though. Not as nicely laid out as the one that was posted here a few days ago.
http://www.therightsideoflife.com/?cat=12
TheRightSideofLife - ‘SOS Lawsuits’ Category
Thanks....It’s a start.
Freep-mail me to get on or off my pro-life and Catholic List:
Please ping me to note-worthy Pro-Life or Catholic threads, or other threads of interest.
Obama Says A Baby Is A Punishment
Obama: “If they make a mistake, I don’t want them punished with a baby.”
If you have a ping list, please me as well. I’ve been following the Donofrip and Wrotnowski cases and starting to follow the Keyes case.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.