Skip to comments.
U. S. SUPREME COURT ASKED TO ISSUEAN INJUNCTION TO STAY ELECTORIAL VOTESON DECEMBER 15, 2008
www.obamacrimes.com ^
| 12/8/2008
| Philip J. Berg
Posted on 12/08/2008 5:44:49 PM PST by Hang'emAll
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-80, 81-100, 101-120, 121-138 last
To: DJ MacWoW
That lawyer who worked for CAIR is the Joe Sandler I mentioned. His law firm works for both CAIR and DNC.
Figures.
121
posted on
12/09/2008 9:12:35 AM PST
by
norge
To: DJ MacWoW
Right. Then, when the reason is explained, they still don't really get it--and in today's context of radical Islam & its all too real threat to us!
I guess partly it's the silence on the part of the MSM worst of all the conservative bloggers and talk hosts we've depended on--some of them calling us loonies & 'truthers'.
Oh that reminds me, have to make a new tinfoil hat, old one fell apart! ;~)
122
posted on
12/09/2008 9:13:57 AM PST
by
luvadavi
(Important old novel: The Moon Is Down, John Steinbeck, 1942)
To: DJ MacWoW
But, as far as I can tell, neither Sandler nor his law firm work directly for Obama. Although, if they did, it wouldn’t surprise me.
123
posted on
12/09/2008 9:15:20 AM PST
by
norge
To: norge
Yeah it’s not a surprise.
124
posted on
12/09/2008 9:17:06 AM PST
by
DJ MacWoW
(Make yourselves sheep and the wolves will eat you. Ben Franklin)
To: luvadavi
I don’t call you a loony, but I am a skeptic on this whole issue of his birth status. (However, I think there may be some loons on FR...shhhh.)
125
posted on
12/09/2008 9:17:51 AM PST
by
norge
To: luvadavi
Americans have become lazy and complacent. They seem to believe that they don’t need to be watchful. That is a mistake.
126
posted on
12/09/2008 9:19:30 AM PST
by
DJ MacWoW
(Make yourselves sheep and the wolves will eat you. Ben Franklin)
To: norge
Before the election, I read articles but didn’t pay a lot of attention. Now I remember that I read stuff but I can’t find it. I know 3 law firms were mentioned but can’t remember the context. Was it an article about a Berg dismissal in a lower court? I just can’t remember. And the $800,000 was mentioned in an article and not the title. It makes searching difficult.
127
posted on
12/09/2008 9:23:51 AM PST
by
DJ MacWoW
(Make yourselves sheep and the wolves will eat you. Ben Franklin)
To: DJ MacWoW
Well, it was only a couple of years after 9/11 when I saw a reporter asking random people in Phila. if they were strongly concerned there could be another attack. Most said they weren’t, had quit thinking about it. One young woman said, get this—”It happened in NY, a long way off. “ Yeah!!
128
posted on
12/09/2008 9:26:08 AM PST
by
luvadavi
(Important old novel: The Moon Is Down, John Steinbeck, 1942)
To: luvadavi
Imagine the comment “Pearl Harbor is a long way off”. There are a lot fewer adults today (meaning less mature people). You have to wonder who does their critical thinking for them.
129
posted on
12/09/2008 9:39:04 AM PST
by
DJ MacWoW
(Make yourselves sheep and the wolves will eat you. Ben Franklin)
To: DJ MacWoW
I know the feeling. Thanks.
130
posted on
12/09/2008 9:50:23 AM PST
by
norge
To: DJ MacWoW
Thanks to public education thru 4 or 5 decades. And universities infiltrated with the leftist scum. Plus the past 20 years or so of the media ignoring it all & helping develop the mindless pop culture.
131
posted on
12/09/2008 10:02:29 AM PST
by
luvadavi
(Important old novel: The Moon Is Down, John Steinbeck, 1942)
To: MilspecRob
I must have missed the court case that proved that You need a court to prove something to you that you can observe to be true with your own eyes? Or, didn't you read Polarik's report, either?
132
posted on
12/09/2008 11:31:52 AM PST
by
Windflier
(To anger a conservative, tell him a lie. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth.)
To: tips up
I think there is plenty to this story. As far as it going anywhere, that's where I'm a skeptic. SCOTUS doesn't want to decide another election. Media uninterested in this story. Most people unaware of this. I completely understand skepticism. I have no issue with skeptics, because most will post their reasoning for feeling that way.
I take issue with the SHUT UP campaigners, who won't put forth a case, and who only seem to be trying to kill the discussion.
133
posted on
12/09/2008 12:03:17 PM PST
by
Windflier
(To anger a conservative, tell him a lie. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth.)
To: trumandogz
"Would this be the same Philip J. Berg, Esquire, who believes that the Attacks of 9/11 were an Inside Job?Absolutely. This little factoid should be pointed out on every thread. Until recently, this man and those that agree with him received much scorn from this very forum ... and now he is considered a warrior for the cause and receives rabid support. Whoda thunk?
134
posted on
12/09/2008 12:08:07 PM PST
by
JustaDumbBlonde
(America: Home of the Free Because of the Brave)
To: Windflier
I love the discussion. But here we are preaching to the choir. I wish there was discussion of this far beyond this forum.
135
posted on
12/09/2008 3:20:02 PM PST
by
tips up
To: DJ MacWoW
By your definition of dual citizen, a Person born in the US to Jewish parents would could not be a natural born citizen.
136
posted on
12/09/2008 3:28:32 PM PST
by
trumandogz
(The Democrats are driving us to Socialism at I00 MPH -The GOP is driving us to Socialism at 97.5 MPH)
To: tips up
I wish there was discussion of this far beyond this forum. I'm sure that wherever patriots gather, this discussion is going on, except in those gathering places where all free thought has been banished.
It pains me to see the campaign being waged against free thought in this place, which is perhaps the most widely read conservative forum on the web.
It appears that the enemy is being allowed to run rampant in our own camp, and no one is putting a stop to it.
137
posted on
12/09/2008 4:58:32 PM PST
by
Windflier
(To anger a conservative, tell him a lie. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth.)
To: norge
Heh..there're loons everywhere! Look at the millions of loonytunes who voted for Hopey-Changy. But seriously, he has got to be hiding something serious; how can it be simple embarrassment at father's name for example, if other than 0bama, no one other than the Justices would see it (a copy of the orig.)and they would not have to disclose that name. Now if the father was a British subject by birth, that goes against the Constitution's requirement for eligibility. If they DQ'd him then they would have to state why.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-80, 81-100, 101-120, 121-138 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson