Posted on 12/08/2008 7:17:20 PM PST by theothercheek
I wanted to post this all day but life got in the way. I know others have posted on this topic, but hopefully this will include new info that the other posts do not:
The New York Times allowed G-d knows how many innocent trees to die so that it could publish a self-serving, deeply disingenuous op-ed by terrorist-cum-educator William Ayers – who actually expects us to feel sorry for his being pilloried during the presidential campaign. ... Let’s deconstruct “the facts” that Ayers and The Times present.
(Excerpt) Read more at thestilettoblog.com ...
To some readers of the Times, Ayers is a hero. To many, he is a sympathetic figure. That’s why the Times published this lousy article by a little wuss who thinks he’s a revolutionary.
I am still sick at heart - and sick to my stomach - that the public fell for this smooth talking con man. I guess they deserve what’s coming - but I don’t and I can’t opt out.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.