Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

What if the President was a FRAUD?
email: ConservativeActionAlerts | 12/13/2008 | Gary Kreep

Posted on 12/13/2008 3:36:19 AM PST by IbJensen

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-133 next last
To: Sci Fi Guy; IbJensen
Enough Already, The people voted. Respect the vote.

Imagine, for a second, that the state screwed up something on your property tax records and sold your property out from under you for tax arrears and after you complain someone tells you "Enough Already. The people purchased the property. Respect the purchase."

You would be the first to point out that the sale was null and void because the very basis for it had no substance in law, only in the carelessness of the state bureaucracy in charge of property tax records.

"Oh, but the people really, REALLY wanted your house, and they've already started moving in! Give it up. It's time to move on."

Yeah, right.
41 posted on 12/13/2008 6:53:47 AM PST by aruanan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Sci Fi Guy
Enough Already, The people voted. Respect the vote.”

Does that include the fraudulent ACORN votes from the dead, the graveyards, dogs and cats too?
Just asking.

42 posted on 12/13/2008 6:58:47 AM PST by SmokingJoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: IbJensen

Obama will face no consequences about the birth certificate controversy....IMO

If we’d be talking about a Republican having this problem, the newspapers would be all over it.

When I mentioned this to a few people, they knew NOTHING about it. This is just the beginning of how Obama will be protected by the media.


43 posted on 12/13/2008 7:08:33 AM PST by Dr. Scarpetta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: IbJensen
Jim, these are simple Kenyan farmers who wouldn't know an Article III court from a crooked Illinois political machine.

My point was a) you don't actually know what these peasants have said, if anything; and b) there are reasons that hearsay (and this isn't even real hearsay, it's "netsay") is not evidence in our tradition.

44 posted on 12/13/2008 7:12:47 AM PST by Jim Noble (Keep hope alive)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Sci Fi Guy
Enough Already, The people voted. Respect the vote.

Yeah. To hell with the Constitution. It was YEARS ago that anybody died for it! /sarc

45 posted on 12/13/2008 7:14:20 AM PST by DJ MacWoW (Make yourselves sheep and the wolves will eat you. Ben Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Sci Fi Guy
Enough Already, The people voted. Respect the vote.

So if enough people wrote in votes for Robert Mugabe to get him 270 electoral votes, would you be okay with that? How about Vladimir Putin? How about Hugo Chavez, or Fidel Castro?

The Founders put that requirement in the Constitution for a reason. They Founded a Constitutional Republic for a reason. I trust their wisdom (yes, dead white guys that they are) more than that of a media-manipulated hoard of sheeple who elected an empty-suit Marxist Alinskyite of questionable background and credentials and who is nothing but a fabrication of the media.

46 posted on 12/13/2008 7:24:43 AM PST by chimera
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: xlib
“Give it up.”

Resistance to the marxists thugs is futile is it not?

47 posted on 12/13/2008 7:36:08 AM PST by DaveTesla (You can fool some of the people some of the time......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Sci Fi Guy
“Enough Already, The people voted. Respect the vote.”

Ahhhh...Errrrr...

Respect the constitution?

48 posted on 12/13/2008 7:41:27 AM PST by DaveTesla (You can fool some of the people some of the time......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: DaveTesla
Oh,so we have a troublemaker here.

Don't you know that the Obama admin is so progressive it will replace the old Left “living constitution” with the new Left officially defunct “anachronistic constitution?”

Adapt or be “re-educated!”

The camps will be waiting.

49 posted on 12/13/2008 7:47:59 AM PST by Happy Rain ("Frank & Dodd will be the Hawley & Smoot of the next Great Depression..")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: xlib
He won. Deal with it.

Would you feel the same if Vladimir Putin had won the popular vote and the USA became the USSA?

let SCOTUS declare the man who just won 53% of the vote ineligible. See if that doesn’t “violently shake this nation.”

I think 47% of the population is more than capable of taking care of themselves and each other.

If being a Conservative and defending the Constitution is too much work for you, get out of they way. We'll take it from here. It's a shame you will forever be blind to the service we perform to your benefit and on your behalf.
50 posted on 12/13/2008 8:16:09 AM PST by so_real
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: so_real
Would you feel the same if Vladimir Putin had won the popular vote and the USA became the USSA?

That's not even an argument. The fact is, Obama is a natural born citizen. I've looked at Berg's arguments; I've read all about Kenyan claims; none of it passes the smell test.

I think 47% of the population is more than capable of taking care of themselves and each other.

If being a Conservative and defending the Constitution is too much work for you, get out of they way. We'll take it from here. It's a shame you will forever be blind to the service we perform to your benefit and on your behalf.

Being a conservative means, in part, accepting reality, and picking your battles wisely. Trying to overturn an election on a nonexistent technicality is not conservative: it's madness. The constitution is under assault from many quarters, and there's plenty of work to do. The Obama birth truthers are not conservative, and they're not defending the constitution. They're trying to overturn the results of an election they are unhappy about, just like the SoreLosermen 8 years ago. The difference is, this time the count is not in doubt. We didn't steal the election in 2000; Bush won by the rules. Now, Obama has won by the rules. I will oppose his liberal policies, and I will support him when I can; that is the conservative way. It is you, and others who won't let this go, who are in the way of the restoration of conservatism.

51 posted on 12/13/2008 10:08:38 AM PST by xlib
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: IbJensen
What if... you woke up one morning and found out that the President of the United States was a USURPER... a FRAUD... a PHONY?

We got one in power now - he passed himself off as a Republican.

52 posted on 12/13/2008 10:26:13 AM PST by Oatka ("A society of sheep must in time beget a government of wolves." –Bertrand de Jouvenel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xlib
So ... Vladimir Putin visits America, knocks up a teenage American girl, fathers a male child, indoctrinates the child into his world views during the child's formative years, and 35 years later buys the U.S. Presidency for the child through the U.S. main stream media. Is that an argument for you?

FRiend, not only is that an argument, but it is precisely the Pandora's Box the Framers worked to keep closed with the "natural born" requirement in the Constitution. AND it draws a striking parallel to the events of this last election. This is the peak of slippery slope. Are you prepared to open the door to insurgence from within? The Framers were not.

The fact is, Obama is a natural born citizen.

Prove it ... You can't ... Any and all documents that could prove it have been locked away where you can't see them. The fact is, by Obama's own admission, he was also a British citizen at birth --- JUST LIKE THE FRAMERS OF OUR CONSTITUTION WERE. Unless Obama also happened to be living at the time the Constitution was adopted, the exception the Framers made for themselves with regard to the "natural born" status does not extend to him. Being a British citizen at birth precludes a "natural born" status.

"No person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President"

This is not about overturning elections. This is about defending the Constitution. It's an unpopular position right now, but I'll stand with the Conservatives. I believe it's what Washington would have done.
53 posted on 12/13/2008 10:59:38 AM PST by so_real
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: xlib

Hussein must offer proof beyond a reasonable doubt that he is a natural born citizen. He has been legally challenged. Rather than produce the requisite documents, he has lawyered up like a Mafia Don. He has spent over 800 G’s on three legal firms, and is thumbing his nose at many of the American people’s demands that he satisfy a basic constitutional requirement. He has insulted our intelligence by proffering an obviously fraudulent Hawaiian Certification of Live Birth as proof of his natural born status, despite the criminal ramifications of such actions.

Three presidential candidates have had their constitutional eligibility challenged in the 20th and 21st centuries, Barry Goldwater, George Romney, and John McCain. All of these men produced the requested documentation for legal analysis. None of them hid behind surrogates and all of them at one time or other addressed the issue in public. None of them relied exclusively on surrogates to speak for them on this matter.

Far more damage will be done to the country if a usurper is allowed to take office, subsequently shown to be ineligible after having signed legislation, initiated ratified treaties, made appointments to US offices, ordered troop movements, only to have all those official acts reversed after the truth comes out. I would rather deal with the riots attendant on keeping him out of office than face a civil war. That war will not be a War Between the States like our affair in the mid 19th Century, where one faction wanted to secede and leave the Fed Gov intact. Both sides, with the exception of Guerrilla skirmishes in the border states, faced off using Napoleonic era tactics with clearly delineated borders. This conflict would be an intermingled inter and intrastate struggle over who controls the government. It would be ugly and probably brutal beyond belief. We must do all that we can do NOW to prevent such a hideous possibility.

If it is apparent beyond reasonable doubt that Hussein is not a natural born citizen, then we must look to any and all legal and constitutional actions to deny him the presidency. If the constitution of the US is not worth defending against mob rule, then nothing is. If we wish to preserve the republic, than we had best let the chips fall, and then sort them out. By whatever means necessary.

We who value the constitution will not allow the moral emphasis of this argument to be inverted. All this speculation, correct or not; has come about because this lying crypto-marxist thug from the most corrupt environs of leftist Chicago sewer politics has ascended to POTUS-elect status with the willing acquiescence of the MSM. The MSM was hell-bent on concealing this usurper’s background because they wanted him to be elected. Now, in a classic case of blame the messenger, those of us who believe in the constitution are being reviled for insisting that a POTUS comply with a basic requirement that most of us unhesitatingly conform with when seeking a driver’s license.

Ask yourself, what kind of narcissistic, self absorbed individual rends the public tranquility like this when the remedy is so easy for a legitimate candidate? The arrogance and effrontery of this man is breathtaking. The founders knew that they were not natural born citizens, so they had to include language in Art II Sec 1 that exempted THEM. Does this fraud think that he is better than Washington, Madison, Adams, and Jefferson in that sense? Apparently he does, and with the acquiescence of enough people, he will succeed in usurping and corrupting the Executive Branch of government. This situation presents the very real possibility of impelling this great nation beyond a constitutional crisis toward a civil war.

Many decry us for undertaking a hopelessly Quixotic enterprise, doomed to failure. Perhaps so. Therefore, I recall you to a time when a group of men, who were attempting to bring a new vision of liberty and democratic republican governance to the world vowed their lives, their fortunes and their sacred honor to that task. Yes, the group of men who were the Founders. I believe that Barack Obama is a unique domestic threat to the republic that they founded that I have never seen before in my lifetime. Hussein is a man who has stated his contempt for a “fundamentally flawed” constitution. I believe that he is prepared, by dint of education and inclination, to destroy or significantly weaken it. He could be our version of Julius Ceasar, a precursor to the end of our Republic, unless we oppose vigorously oppose him NOW before he gets into office. (If he can prove his natural born status, then I will accept that and oppose him on policy being CERTAIN that I will have to owing to his already professed world view)

Finally, consider the implications of a man who would undertake these devious machinations to knowingly assume an office that he has no constitutional claim to, and than to see this same counterfeit president elect take an oath to defend that constitution. I believe that such a man would be willing to impose ANY sort or despotism or tyranny upon us to retain power.


54 posted on 12/13/2008 11:21:55 AM PST by DMZFrank
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: so_real
So ... Vladimir Putin visits America, knocks up a teenage American girl, fathers a male child, indoctrinates the child into his world views during the child's formative years, and 35 years later buys the U.S. Presidency for the child through the U.S. main stream media. Is that an argument for you?

Well, no, since the scenario you describe wouldn't run afoul of the "natural born citizen" requirement, unless the child was born outside the US. As to proof, unless there's a massive conspiracy which includes hospital bureaucrats, local newspapers (in 1961!) and local and state government officials in Hawaii as well as numerous judges up to and including at least 4 Supreme Court Justices, the proof has been provided to the people who need to see it. I don't have to prove a thing, and I have examined the "proof" that's being circulated by the birth-truthers. It's not just lame; it's Andrew Sullivan lame. (Or do you think Sullivan has a right to Trig's birth certificate too?) Worse, to the extent it gains any traction (which thankfully it's not) it threatens conservatism by making us all look like tin-foil-hatters.

55 posted on 12/13/2008 12:07:40 PM PST by xlib
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: xlib
"Well, no, ..."

That scenario doesn't trouble you at all? And you feel you are a Constitutional conservative? I confess I am surprised. I guess we'll have to agree to disagree. Keep your seat belt on regardless, FRiend; there's bumpy road ahead. Either way you look at it, there's a socialist with his eye on the POTUS chair.
56 posted on 12/13/2008 1:12:17 PM PST by so_real
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: IbJensen

wow, that was long.


57 posted on 12/13/2008 1:40:24 PM PST by stompk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SumProVita

I stopped reading after it said congress could pass a new law. Can’t pass a law ex post facto.


58 posted on 12/13/2008 1:43:25 PM PST by nufsed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: so_real

Words mean things. I didn’t say your scenario was not troubling; I said it’s not a constitutional argument, absent Putin’s “love child” being born outside the US. I dont “feel” I am a constitutional conservative; I am. There is no constitutional issue concerning Baracks’ birth place. It’s been resolved to the satisfaction of the relevant authorities, and the vast majority of conservatives. I find many things about Obama troubling, as I said. But this line of attack is worse than erroneous; it’s counter to the conservative cause. It makes us no better than the Kos kids, the 911 “truthers” or DU.

Again, give it up. There’s real work to be done.


59 posted on 12/13/2008 2:19:17 PM PST by xlib
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: xlib

If it were resolved to the relavent satisfaction of authorities, then why doesn’t the State Dept. claim to have a copy. It is this Dept. that has requested the copy multiple times, as is the case for any Candidate. All other Candidates provided proof. A verifiable original or copy of the original vault certificate.

Obama has only produced a doctored-up COLB image.

Obama should not be allowed to trample on the Constitution and he isn’t even President yet.


60 posted on 12/13/2008 2:25:17 PM PST by jetxnet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-133 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson