Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Motion for Subpoenes for Obama BC issued in WA... heard...full court BO announces vacation in HI
Natural Born Citizen - Orly ^ | December 18, 2008

Posted on 12/19/2008 9:48:45 PM PST by Red Steel

Motion for Subpoenes for Obama BC issued in WA state, case to be heard by the full court. BO announces vacation in HI

COMES NOW, James E. Broe, Kenneth R. Seal, Robert Baker, Mark Sussman, Stan Walter, Bill Wise, Andy Stevens, Ed Crawford, Jason Lagen, Louise Workman, Jocelyn Murcelli, Mike Murcelli and Kevin McDowell, by and through counsel of record Stephen Pidgeon, pursuant to RAP 17.3(a), the Rules of Discovery, CR 26-37, and CR 45 governing the issuance of subpoenas, and Move this Honorable Court for an order allowing the issuance of two subpoenas for the purpose of obtaining admissible evidence in this case, and expediting discovery pursuant to the proposed schedule.

Relief Requested

Plaintiffs seek an Order allowing plaintiffs expedited discovery by means of two subpoenas, one to be served on the Secretary of State of the State of Washington, to discover the following items: I) the Declaration of Candidacy of Barack Obama as filed in the State of Washington; 2) all records concerning the candidacy and disallowance of Socialist Worker’s Party candidate Frank Colero within the Secretary of State’s office; and one to be served upon the Director of the Department of Health in the State of Hawaii, to discover the following items: 3) the Birth Certificate of Barack Obama in Hawaii, and 4) all supporting documentation regarding the registration of the birth of Barack Obama in Hawaii. Plaintiffs seek an order which establishes the following schedule.

1. Plaintiffs are to serve the State of Hawaii Department of Health with a Subpoena in the form attached hereto as approved by the Court no later than the close of business on Monday, December 22, 2008, and responses shall be served upon Plaintiffs’ ‘counsel. no later than the close of business on December 28, 2008.


TOPICS: Government; Politics
KEYWORDS: bammysboys; bctroofers; bho2008; birthcertificate; certifigate; getalife; ifoverwhydoyoucare; itsover; kookooforcocoapuffs; loosertrolls; nirthcertifikate; obama; obamashoekissers; obamastrolhos; obamatrolls; obamatruthfile; obamazombies; paranoiddolts; puffonthistroll; seebammyrun; tinfoil; yougetalifetroll
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-94 next last
It's only 3 days away for discovery in Hawaii. Obama is to head for Hawaii on the same date. What is Zer0 scared of?

Heehee...

1 posted on 12/19/2008 9:48:45 PM PST by Red Steel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Red Steel

This is just a motion at this point?


2 posted on 12/19/2008 9:52:18 PM PST by arrogantsob (Hero vs Zero)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel; LucyT; Gemsbok; pissant; TigersEye; FreeAtlanta; ari-freedom; little jeremiah; ...

Ping.


3 posted on 12/19/2008 9:57:49 PM PST by Red Steel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel
Will Obama travel with his army of lawyers to Hawaii like he did during his visit to grandma?

Why was Obama present during granny's final days, yet not present during her funeral?

Did he or one of his thugs murder her?

Why did Obama's people at Daily Kos release a forgery and call it his birth certificate?

4 posted on 12/19/2008 10:01:07 PM PST by Prole (Please pray for the families of Chris and Channon. May God always watch over them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel

Ink must finally be dry ... wanna bet Fukino will accompany him when he presents at the vault location?


5 posted on 12/19/2008 10:02:39 PM PST by MHGinTN (Believing they cannot be deceived, they cannot be convinced when they are deceived.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel
Have the actual subpoenas been issued?
6 posted on 12/19/2008 10:03:11 PM PST by hoosiermama (Berg is a liberal democrat. Keyes is a conservative. Obama is bringing us together already!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel

There is something on that BC he doesn’t want known and there just aren’t many possibilities.


7 posted on 12/19/2008 10:03:57 PM PST by TigersEye (I threw my shoe at Mohammed and hit Allah in the butt.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel

Did you see this:

For a Ten day visit, President-elect Barack Obama is scheduled to arrive in Hawaii tomorrow for what will be his third visit to the islands this year.

The compound he will be renting costs $8,250 per day.

http://www.starbulletin.com/news/20081219_Obama_due_back_in_isles_for_10-day_trip.html


8 posted on 12/19/2008 10:04:32 PM PST by LucyT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: LucyT

Head start in case he needs to make a quick get away??????


9 posted on 12/19/2008 10:07:41 PM PST by hoosiermama (Berg is a liberal democrat. Keyes is a conservative. Obama is bringing us together already!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: LucyT

Obama pushed up the Hawaiian visit date. He’s scared.


10 posted on 12/19/2008 10:08:41 PM PST by Red Steel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: hoosiermama

Obama was in Hawaii about 2 weeks ago shopping around for help. He sought out influential people. He’s been writing letter(s) to Governor Linda Lingle. He’s scared out of his wits if the Washington Court grants discovery.


11 posted on 12/19/2008 10:12:55 PM PST by Red Steel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel

PING


12 posted on 12/19/2008 10:13:34 PM PST by Turret Gunner A20 (The common argument that crime is caused by poverty is a kind of slander on the poor. H.L. Mencken)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Prole
Why did Obama's people at Daily Kos release a forgery and call it his birth certificate?

He may want to try to do it again if he can pull it off. He will need a professional job this time to do it.

If Lingle was smart she, made certified copies of all documents relating to Obama's origin and secured them at different locations.

13 posted on 12/19/2008 10:16:57 PM PST by Red Steel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel

For those who haven’t been following the matter closely, this is arguably the strongest case of all, due to Washington State statute that clearly gives standing to the plaintiffs to sue over ineligibility. The statute arose from that disputed Gregoire election. The suit is further strengthened by the fact that Calero was expressly denied access to the ballot due to ineligibility, for the 2008 Presidential election. Thus, it is not possible for the Washington Secretary of State, Reed, to make any claim that eligibility was determined by party certification.

Why, though, is Calero referred to as “Frank,” instead of “Roger,” as he is known on all the other state ballots?


14 posted on 12/19/2008 10:17:55 PM PST by RegulatorCountry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel

Red, surely with all of BO foreign connections he can find one who knows someone, who knows someone that is an expert.

Problem may be getting an original to copy,


15 posted on 12/19/2008 10:29:40 PM PST by hoosiermama (Berg is a liberal democrat. Keyes is a conservative. Obama is bringing us together already!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel
Oh, keeping my fingers crossed on this. Hoping it will be known and authenticated BEFORE Jan. 20th. The Congress would never impeach him no matter what.
16 posted on 12/19/2008 10:35:03 PM PST by Humal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hoosiermama
Yes, Obama has millions of campaign funds left around to spend. It's a real problem for a forger to get hold of a long BC form circa 1961 -- maybe getting the same old paper is easier to print a duplicate form on it. The forger would need a doctor's or mid-wife's signature, et al. Forging the signature of a dead doctor or mid-wife would be the way to go. The forger would need an old typewriter and ribbon to go with it. After the forger completed a forged professional looking document. He'd have to switch it with the real one. Get someone on the inside to switch it and to get rid of any supporting documents.

The question, is Obama hiding something that would destroy his presidency, and if that's the case, does he have the balls to go through with it?

17 posted on 12/19/2008 10:49:04 PM PST by Red Steel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel

A freeper who is a court clerk said that in order for a paper from the court house to be used as evidence in court, it must be picked up by a court clerk and hand delivered with LEO accompaniment to the stand. They then must swear it has never been out of their sight as does the LEO.

In this case I want a locked brief case, military transportation and the FBI to be involved.


18 posted on 12/19/2008 10:57:06 PM PST by hoosiermama (Berg is a liberal democrat. Keyes is a conservative. Obama is bringing us together already!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: hoosiermama

Do what the democrats do, find a FAVORABLE judge!


19 posted on 12/19/2008 11:00:29 PM PST by FTJM
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel

maybe he’ll trade hawaii secession for a birth certificate

best regards, blu


20 posted on 12/19/2008 11:07:42 PM PST by blueplum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Humal

The Congress would never impeach him no matter what.

Oh yes they would. They would have no choice. If they didn’t there would be a 2nd revolution and nobody wants that


21 posted on 12/19/2008 11:16:57 PM PST by KellyM37
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel; bushwon

Bump for later reading!


22 posted on 12/19/2008 11:18:44 PM PST by bushwon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel

Ping.

Bookmark for later.


23 posted on 12/19/2008 11:22:35 PM PST by Iowan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Admin Moderator

Calling your attention to keyword abuse, involving profanity. I have no idea who is responsible, but you are able to tell. It looks to be getting out of hand.


24 posted on 12/19/2008 11:23:04 PM PST by RegulatorCountry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel

I seriously doubt that anything will come of this. Given the history of BO’s refusal to disclose I would expect that, IF the WA court issues the Subpoena, he will just ignore it or claim he doesn’t have to respond or invent “pre-executive privilege” or some other lunacy. I DO think it is interesting that he’s heading to Hawaii right now ... who/what is in Hawaii that he wants to see for Xmas? Why not stay in Chicago??? Unless he needs to be there to strong-arm local officials or keep them from answering a subpoena.


25 posted on 12/19/2008 11:49:51 PM PST by TexasGreg ("Democrats Piss Me Off")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TexasGreg

In other words ... if it comes down to it, Obama will appeal to a Federal court, and the Federal court will throw it out.


26 posted on 12/19/2008 11:50:37 PM PST by TexasGreg ("Democrats Piss Me Off")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: TexasGreg

If so, it won’t be thrown out on standing. If there is an issue with merit, it will be due to a too narrow focus upon the potential cause(s) of ineligibility. I’m very suspicious of how this has all come to be understood as being about Obama’s birth certificate. That’s exactly how Chester Arthur bamboozled critics in his day. No coincidence, imho.


27 posted on 12/20/2008 12:28:38 AM PST by RegulatorCountry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: RegulatorCountry

Let me know how that keyword abuse thing turns out. I did the same thing and the admin mod zotted the troll “searchin”. Then a few days later the admin mod said tough luck. So I think it’s a flip of the coin depending upon which admin mod you get and the phase of the moon and the quaternary nature of the universe phase conjugate reality particle.


28 posted on 12/20/2008 1:09:07 AM PST by Kevmo ( It's all over for this Country as a Constitutional Republic. ~Leo Donofrio, 12/14/08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: KellyM37
“Oh yes they would.”

And just like Bill Clinton he will be voted not guilty. Then he will get a big bump in the polls and the Republicans and Conservatives will suffer a beating for years.

The press and dems will pronounce him King for life.

29 posted on 12/20/2008 1:38:34 AM PST by JSteff (It was ALL about SCOTUS. Most forget about that and may have doomed us for a generation or more.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: KellyM37
"If they didn’t there would be a 2nd revolution and nobody wants that"

A coup demands the people react/take action.

We really want to be a nation of law(s) and have desperately attempted to abide by law.

The Gregoire (D) theft is just another example of the fascist/socialist tactics coming around and biting themselves in the ass.

30 posted on 12/20/2008 1:59:46 AM PST by knarf (I say things that are true ... I have no proof ... but they're true.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: sjeann
ping for you and for Emlk too.
31 posted on 12/20/2008 3:05:32 AM PST by Bellflower (A Brand New Day Is Coming!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blueplum

BINGO!


32 posted on 12/20/2008 3:59:00 AM PST by wewereright
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: KellyM37
"The Congress would never impeach him no matter what.

'Oh yes they would. They would have no choice. If they didn’t there would be a 2nd revolution and nobody wants that'

So are you saying that it's okay for him to take office before he proves he is a natural-born citiizen? Shouldn't the 2nd revolution occur before he is inaugurated if he doesn't show he is qualifieid to hold office?

It's his responsibility to come up with proof -- not our responsibility to dig up his birth certificate. All he has to do is show it. Why burden the people with what might be an impossible task when it falls to the candidate to prove himself/herself worthy of office?

33 posted on 12/20/2008 4:04:32 AM PST by Eastbound
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel

Forum guidelines prohibit the posting of profanity on the open forum. This rule also applies to keywords. Quit posting profanity in keywords. Thank you.


34 posted on 12/20/2008 4:44:00 AM PST by Admin Moderator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RegulatorCountry

Thanks for the tip.


35 posted on 12/20/2008 4:44:46 AM PST by Admin Moderator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: KellyM37
“Oh yes they would. They would have no choice.”

I disagree with you here. If, after Jan. 20th, Obama is proven to not be a “natural born citizen” by whatever procedure, do you really think Pelosi, Franks, Reid, Clinton (her memories of Bill's impeachment haven't faded), Kennedy, et al would allow/bring charges of impeachment against him? They would excuse it away or “the next time we do something” or some other lame excuse, and nobody would challenge them.

36 posted on 12/20/2008 4:45:22 AM PST by Humal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel
Does this Obama eligibility mess fit into some type of catch-22?

As I see it, this Obama birth certificate mess is a Catch-22:

1. On the one hand, we need the courts help so that we can see Obama's Hawaii long form birth certificate ---the one with the doctor and birth hospital names on it---in order to prove whether or not Obama is eligible to be president. This sounds reasonable to me.

2. But, on the other hand, the courts say that they cannot allow us access to Obama's Hawaii long form birth certificate until we prove that Obama is NOT eligible.

3. I'm screaming at the courts: If we could prove that Obama was NOT eligible without referring to the long form birth certificate, we would do so, and we would not need the courts to help us get Obama's long form birth certificate in the first place!

Is this crazy or what?

37 posted on 12/20/2008 4:56:38 AM PST by john mirse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: KellyM37

I don’t think an impeachment would be necessary. The man would NOT be President, for the reason that no one, not Congress and not the electorate could ever make him President, and therefore Congress would not need to act as if he were the President, neither de jure or de facto.

All that would be required is for the Federal marshalls, acting under court order, to evict him from the premeses without fanfare or ado.

Just set the SOB in the street.


38 posted on 12/20/2008 4:59:49 AM PST by John Valentine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel

Is Obama going back to Hawaii to hush everyone up? A criminal cover-up?

Note that Obama went to Hawaii just before his grandmother died. When she passed away after the campaign when Obama had more time, he failed to attend her funeral......... Hummmmmmmm?

I applaud these folks in Washington State.

http://www.rallycongress.com/constitutional-qualification/1244


39 posted on 12/20/2008 5:06:22 AM PST by real_patriotic_american
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel

Gee I have an old circa 1950’s typewriter in the basement with the ribbon. It does still work....hmmm....


40 posted on 12/20/2008 5:44:07 AM PST by EBH ( Directive 10-289)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: EBH

I am betting the Governor has not only the tightest security around this document she may even have plans in store in case it was stolen.

There was some silly talk around here in Wasilla that Lingle sent a copy of the original BC to Sarah and she had it at her church, and I tell anyone here that is a really wild rumor by tinhatters trying to shift blame about the church fire. But I don know the security that was here for Sarah is most definitely still here.


41 posted on 12/20/2008 6:48:29 AM PST by Eye of Unk (Americans should lead America, its the right way.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: All

Pravda, English edition, states they challenge anyone to find a record of Madelyn Durham being hospitalized or her death certificate.
What’s up with this? This true?


42 posted on 12/20/2008 7:16:39 AM PST by patriot08
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel

Found here:
“Letter from a reader, sample complaint to the Illinois bar against Obama”

http://drorly.blogspot.com/2008/12/letter-from-reader-sample-complaint-to.html

And also here in comments section:

http://www.therightsideoflife.com/?p=2066

“Downloadable sample complaint to the Illinois bar against Obama”

http://www.4shared.com/file/76849580/92269d92/ATTORNEY_GRIEVANCE_COMPLAINT_AGAINST_BARACK_OBAMA.html


43 posted on 12/20/2008 7:39:04 AM PST by rosettasister
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Eastbound

I agree it is his responsibility. He has never known that word though. WND had a private investigator do some research. Here is the link.

http://www.worldnetdaily.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=83851


44 posted on 12/20/2008 7:52:14 AM PST by Lumper20
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel

jrh Says:

With regard to the post about forging the original long form — it’s probable that the archive is on microfiche and would be in reels of sequential documents recorded as they occurred. That would be a more formidable forgery task.


45 posted on 12/20/2008 8:14:40 AM PST by rosettasister
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lumper20
The dates for the news ads are August 8 and August 13. Plenty of time to call both papers and forward the information for the birth notice, regardless of where he was born.

Though it would seem more likely that if he was born in Hawaii, the info would be sent to the newspapers without that kind of delay.

46 posted on 12/20/2008 8:43:31 AM PST by Eastbound
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: rosettasister
According to HS §338-18, one of the individuals authorized to obtain verification of Obama's birth certificate is "a person whose right to inspect or obtain a certified copy of the record is established by an order of a court of competent jurisdiction," but even though this provision does not spell out what is the "court of competent jurisdiction," I would assume that, at a minimum, the Hawaiian Supreme Court, or a Federal court could issue a court order for its release.

I personally believe that Obama's original Kenyan birth certificate is sitting in a sealed envelope locked away in the Vital Records vault. The statement made by Fukino and Onaka did not say that they actualy "saw" the paper birth certificate or even if they saw a microfiche of it.

They only said that they had personally "seen and verified that Hawaii has it on record." Now, had they actually looked at the document itself, then they would have said that they had "personally seen and verified Obama's original Birth Certificate," but that is not at all what they said. All they said was that they saw to it that the Health Department had it on record," which leads me to conclude again, that they saw nothing tangible on which they could actually put their fingers.

Now, they also could have been looking at microfiche instead of looking at a sealed envelope that had an official label on it saying, "Obama's original birth certificate," but, again I'm opting for the sealed envelope scenario.

The way that they would have handled Obama's out-of-state, late birth registration would have been for Stanley Dunham to hand over to Hawaii Obama's Kenyan Birth Certificate, which was then deposited in an enveloped and sealed, after which they issued her a Hawaiian Certificate of Birth which has the same info as on the Kenyan birth certificate.

There can be only one, original birth certificate, so the document that Hawaii issued to Stanley is NOT the original birth certificate on record -- the Kenyan one is, however.

47 posted on 12/20/2008 9:31:38 AM PST by Polarik (quote)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: arrogantsob; pissant; Red Steel; LucyT; Gemsbok; TigersEye; FreeAtlanta; little jeremiah; ...

Didn't the Westlaw attachment in the response give "justification" for Pidgeon?

http://decalogosintl.org/documents/sos/Response_to_Discovery_Motion.pdf (pg 8 of 9)

Title 19. Health
~ Chapter 338. Vital Statistics
~~ Part I. State Public Health Statistics Act
~~~ § 338-18. Disclosure of records ...
(g) The department shall not issue a verification in lieu of a certified copy of any such record, or any part thereof, unless it is satisfied that the applicant requesting a verification is: ...
(4): “A private or government attorney who seeks to confirm information about a vital event relating to any such records which was acquired during the course of or for purposes of legal proceedings”

In theory, if an attorney has been responded to with a copy of the "CertificATION of Live Birth" from Camp Obama, it should give that attorney justification to request "verification in lieu of a certified copy."

Don't all of the attorneys (Berg, Taitz, Pidgeon, etc) qualify under this portion?


48 posted on 12/20/2008 9:45:42 AM PST by BP2 (I think, therefore I'm a conservative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: LucyT; Calpernia
I don't know if something like statute §338-17.8 was in effect in 1961, but if it was, then regardless of where Stanley gave birth to Obama, she could have said that she and OBama Sr. had been living with her mom for a year prior to Obama's birth, even if she really wasn't -- as long as her mom vouched for her -- and that would have been sufficient for Stanley to obtain an original Hawaiian birth certificate for Obama.

In fact, if Obama had proof of residency that Stanley & Obama Sr. had been living in Hawaii for a year prior to his birth, then he, himself, could obtain an amended Certification of Live Birth.

49 posted on 12/20/2008 10:19:02 AM PST by Polarik (quote)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: hoosiermama; Red Steel; Frantzie

I spoke to Steve Pidgeon on the phone on Friday and he said the hearing date for the motion for discovery subpoenas will be Jun 8, the same as the hearing date to decide if they take the case. He was saying that he may request that the en banc hearing date be moved back so that the discovery motion can be heard first and they have time to issue the subpoenas.


50 posted on 12/20/2008 10:33:47 AM PST by LongIslandConservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-94 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson