Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Why Obama's BC was Sealed?
Hawaii State Legislature ^ | 12/26/2008 | ..phiLip..

Posted on 12/26/2008 3:50:39 AM PST by usar91B

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-73 next last
To: pepsionice
"If you have only one state with this act in place...then he can only run in 49 states...and the reputation from being a 49-state guy....makes him a fool in another twenty states."

Don't you remember - Barry said he'd be the leader of all 57 states.

21 posted on 12/26/2008 5:04:04 AM PST by TPOOH (I wish I could have been Jerry Reed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: DooDahhhh
Because if they do, and they find out that he is NOT qualified, how embarassed would they all be? I think they are not wanting to be exposed for not being diligent in the biggest fraud in the history of the USA.

Photobucket

22 posted on 12/26/2008 5:04:31 AM PST by autumnraine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: nobama08

Numerous sources

example

http://www.casttv.com/video/7mhhop1/obama-spent-800-000-over-a-10-birth-certificate-video


23 posted on 12/26/2008 5:10:15 AM PST by dascallie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Venturer

The idea that avoiding civil unrest by ignoring the Birth Certificate is best for the country is plain cowardice.

Sad, but I can only come to the conclusion that the reason above is why no one in authority will address the B.C. situation.

The COLB is not an original Birth Certificate and the O.B.C. will not be revealed because it would disqualify Obama for one reason or another.


24 posted on 12/26/2008 5:15:12 AM PST by classified
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Venturer
I believe that Obama is qualified, but that the father’s name is not Obama.

Quite possible that O Senior was not the biological father. However, it appears they were indeed legally married when O was born, so the legal father is most definitely O Senior.

In most states any child born to a married couple is by definition the legal child of the husband, regardless of whether it is even possible for him be the biological father. DNA and other proof of paternity is just irrelevant to this legality.

25 posted on 12/26/2008 5:15:30 AM PST by Sherman Logan (Everyone has a right to his own opinion, but not to his own facts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: usar91B
Is this why Obama's Birth Certificate was sealed? If so, does this indicate a foreign birth?

Considering that those two laws appear to have been adopted in 1990 and 1980 respectively then I kind of doubt it.

26 posted on 12/26/2008 5:18:51 AM PST by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dascallie

LOL - I have heard all sorts of figures. Lawyers generally don’t tell others what they are charging or what they have been paid. I have not seen any proof that Nobama has actually hired any lawyers for this. Just don’t believe everything on the net.


27 posted on 12/26/2008 5:35:10 AM PST by nobama08
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Sherman Logan

How was the marriage legal if Obama Sr. was married to a woman in Kenya at the time he purportedly marriage Stanley Ann Dunham?


28 posted on 12/26/2008 5:38:35 AM PST by nobama08
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: nobama08

“I have not seen any proof that Nobama has actually hired any lawyers for this. Just don’t believe everything on the net.”

What?

Who are you? Has not hired any lawyers for this?

The Berg v Obama action alone has generated continuous legal fees—all a matter of record—multiply that by at least 24—the number of suits pending on the Obama BC controversy.

You are a noise-maker to attempt to drown out the facts.


29 posted on 12/26/2008 5:47:18 AM PST by dascallie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: dascallie

I just don’t take my “facts” from sketchy websites. I like proof.

~~Name~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~Address~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~Phone~~~
Attorneys for Petitioner:
Philip J. Berg 555 Andorra Glen Court, Suite 12 (610) 825-3134
Lafayette Hill, PA 19444-2531
Party name: Philip J. Berg
Attorneys for Respondents:
Gregory G. Garre Solicitor General (202) 514-2217
United States Department of Justice
950 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.
Washington, DC 20530-0001
Party name: Federal Election Commission, et al.
Other:
Lawrence J. Joyce Lawrence J. Joyce LLC (520) 584-0236
1517 N. Wilmot Rd., #215
Tucson, AZ 85712
barmemberlj@earthlink.net
Party name: Bill Anderson

http://origin.www.supremecourtus.gov/docket/08-570.htm

Which of these lawyers did Nobama hire?


30 posted on 12/26/2008 5:50:56 AM PST by nobama08
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: nobama08

You are playing semantic games. The monies have been spent. We all know the DNC acted for Obama.

And in fact were named as party to the suit...the funds expended have been exorbidant. And common sense asks why the investment to stonewall.

Please stop the ponderous questions to which you know the answers.


31 posted on 12/26/2008 5:54:40 AM PST by dascallie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: nobama08

In many if not most states, apparently including HI, a bigamous marriage is considered legal for purposes of determining legitimacy of any children born, especially if the “innocent” partner was ignorant of the previous marriage.

http://law.jrank.org/pages/11834/Annulment-Prohibited-Marriage-Prohibited-Marriage.html


32 posted on 12/26/2008 5:59:57 AM PST by Sherman Logan (Everyone has a right to his own opinion, but not to his own facts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: dascallie

I don’t know the answers. But it doesn’t appear that Nobama has spent any of HIS money on this so what does he have to lose in fighting it? But to keep saying Nobama has spent $800,000 is probably not true. The truth matters if you want credibility, doesn’t it? And the solicitor general is taxpayer funded, I believe.


33 posted on 12/26/2008 6:00:41 AM PST by nobama08
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Sherman Logan

I am not questioning Nobama’s “legitimacy”, just his so-called parents’ marriage.


34 posted on 12/26/2008 6:02:26 AM PST by nobama08
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: nobama08

It appears that the marriage was not legal, as Obama dad was apparently already married to at least one woman in Kenya.

I don’t see why this should affect our view of the president-elect one way or another.


35 posted on 12/26/2008 6:13:26 AM PST by Sherman Logan (Everyone has a right to his own opinion, but not to his own facts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Sherman Logan

How could they be legally married if he was already married in Kenya to another woman?


36 posted on 12/26/2008 6:15:23 AM PST by Venturer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Sherman Logan

It doesn’t affect my view of Nobama. I still don’t trust him and still think he is a liar.


37 posted on 12/26/2008 6:16:14 AM PST by nobama08
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Sherman Logan

It doesn’t affect my view of Nobama. I still don’t trust him and still think he is a liar.


38 posted on 12/26/2008 6:16:14 AM PST by nobama08
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: usar91B

If he was born in Kenya he is a fraud and has committed mail fraud on top of wasting elecoral money.


39 posted on 12/26/2008 6:22:47 AM PST by jetson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Venturer

I don’t believe they were legally married. However, this doesn’t change Obama’s status as a legitimate child with legal paternity by Obama Senior or his status as a natural-born American citizen.


40 posted on 12/26/2008 6:22:58 AM PST by Sherman Logan (Everyone has a right to his own opinion, but not to his own facts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-73 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson