Posted on 07/02/2009 10:15:30 PM PDT by Pitcairn
Look folks. Are we kidding with Mark Sanford? Is this some sort of sick joke, keeping this cad around?
We’ve already gone over this, days ago.
We don’t care how much “love” this man got from his foreign woman or what his financial records look like. The man is scum and needs to leave the South Carolina governor’s mansion right now.
(Excerpt) Read more at blog.politicalcastaway.com ...
Is this too much to ask of American politicans or should we just go the way of valueless Europe and the savages of the Middle East?
Your post is interesting.
The Constitution does not address fornication and adultery. That is in the Bible.
If the good people of South Carolina decide to forgive Sanford, that is their choice. Not the federal governments.
The founding fathers were not “chaste”.
When you get some time, you may want to read the Constitution.
Have a good evening.
Clinton lied under oath, kiddo.
No. He is a “Horney” Scumbag.
That only makes him HALF bad.
You also have to understand that while under the influence of being “Horney” you can often become a “Scumbag” by default.
This issue has nothing to do with Constitutional legality. This issue has to do with whether an elected official should remain as such without a modicum of moral integrity.
Didn’t Ted Kennedy kill a girl a few years back? Perhaps you should worry about that.
There are plenty of other potential governors out there that need no sink to the lowest common denominator of the society they are supposed to lead toward a higher standard of conduct.
"People" are supposed to do that for themselves, or they are truly lost.
Does it really make any sense to say that lying need be only under oath to be wrong and therefore, then only, grounds to no longer hold public office, kiddo?
I don’t think so.
It’s been said that a woman needs a reason to have sex, and a man just needs a place. (if that)
If you live in South Carolina and have the opportunity, vote the guy out of office, do it.
If you live in Mississippi...it's not your business. Or the Feds business.
Is he immoral...absolutely. It is a soap opera. I live in Texas. My vote would not count.
Do you really want the Feds to have that kind of control?
So, then,why even have elected “leaders” if the “people” can lead themselves?
When you bring up the threat of impeachment: YES.
....kiddo?
Don't steal my stuff, kiddo!
That being said, the Sanford is a dirt bag and his state's polity should vote him out or their legislature take action to impeach him.
Regardless of the procedural debate, the man is a flat out liar who, in my opinion, should no longer hold public office.
Kiddo, we are in agreement.
Although, I deny that anything was stolen.
Don't make stuff up, kiddo.
If I lived in South Carolina, I would be up in arms over this. If the man tries to take a national office, I would not support him. He has lost any chance he had of reelection or election to another office through his behavior, but I believe the Lt. Gov is a Dim, so the people might not wish to trade one scumbag for another.
Because Republicans are so supposed to represent the better angels of our nature. They are supposed to stand for Judeo-Christian values.
It is the Democrats that stand for Satan, immorality, homosexuality, abortion of the innocent (even outside the birth canal), theft, socialism, welfare, racsim, etc.
Lincoln fell short, we all fall short. Claro que...republicans are the better angels of our nature? Who buys that happy horse **** they are all bought and paid for in one way or another. If he repents can we not forgive?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.