Posted on 08/16/2009 12:51:12 PM PDT by Arizona SCG
Obama eligibility case will be heard on merits By CaptainAstro on July 14, 2009 11:37 AM | No Comments | No TrackBacks http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/blog1/
Orly Taitz, the attorney in Keyes v. Obama.
At the hearing today at the Federal Court building in Santa Ana, Judge Carter said the following:
1. There will be a trial. 2. It will be heard on the merits. 3. Nothing will be dismissed on proceedural issues. 4. The trial will be expeditious, and the judge pledged to give case priority. 5. Being a former Marine he realizes the importance of having a Constitutionally qualified POTUS/CINC. 6. Judge stated that if Obama isn't Constitutionally qualifed he needs to leave the White House.
The DOJ will be involved with the case also.... I wasn't clear if they would be trying to get to the truth or they would just be blindly representing Obama.
Orly will be adding members of the military from California as plaintiffs also.
Judge Carter ain’t playing. Here comes the Judge.
Is this the case where Orly plans to introduce, as evidence, the Kenyan Birth Certificate?
I sure hope he isn’t playing.
This was from July 14, and was of dubious origin then.
Search FR there have been several threads this week.
I wasn’t aware she had a Kenyan BC for President five names.
Did life long congressman Ron Paul help obtain it?
I like the sound of this:
Excerpt-
“At the hearing today at the Federal Court building in Santa Ana, Judge Carter said the following:
1. There will be a trial. 2. It will be heard on the merits. 3. Nothing will be dismissed on proceedural issues. 4. The trial will be expeditious, and the judge pledged to give case priority. 5. Being a former Marine he realizes the importance of having a Constitutionally qualified POTUS/CINC. 6. Judge stated that if Obama isn’t Constitutionally qualifed he needs to leave the White House.”
It was a Democrat operative's forgery created in a plot to trick Taitz into embarrassing herself. It worked.
“The case pending in U.S. District Court in Orange County, California, on the subject of President Obama’s qualifications, has changed its lead plaintiff. Formerly, the case was known as Alan Keyes v Barack Obama. Keyes is still a co-plaintiff, but the lead plaintiff is now Pamela Barnett, an officer of the U.S. military, so the case will in the future be called Barnett v Obama. Thanks to Bill Van Allen for this news.”
“dubious origin?”
You call a U.S. District Court a “dubious origin?” LOL
IT would seem that Orly was not the only one that fell for and embarrassed themselves over that alleged Kenyan Birth Certificate.
Did she submit the Forged BC into evidence in any court of law?
When did they prove it was forged? I went camping for a few days and probably missed it. Please send me a link.
I didn’t write it was forged or that she is using it as eveidence.
It’s a Ron Paul / DNC thing.
When did they prove it was forged?The only real proof of a forgery would be to look up the book number and page number on the certificate in the Kenyon Birth Register and see if there is an entry for Barak Obama. To my knowledge that has not been done.
--Krodg
Apparently she submitted it, or an image of it, in the case in Florida concerning the Army Reserve Major who lost his job for asking to see the "papers" of his CinC.
However, she seems to indicate on her blog that she not only has a physical copy, but that it is not the only one "out there".
“FREE THE LONG FORM!”
Apparently
LMAO!
Take as strong a position on her having used tha Kenyan BC as you do about Birthers being wrong.
The DOJ will be involved.....end of the case right there.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.