Posted on 10/03/2009 9:15:02 PM PDT by MissTickly
OUR WORST NIGHTMARE CONFIRMED: Obama’s COLB Lacks Legal Veracity. What Now?
On July 27, 2009, Obama was not verified as ‘Constitutionally Qualified to be U.S. President’ by the standards of Hawaii’s Department of Health and Vital Statistics Registrar. Any assertions by Nancy Pelosi or anyone else must be reexamined under the following LIGHT: THE KEY: ‘FILED by Local Registrar’ vs. ‘ACCEPTED by State Registrar’
We have two statements about two sets of vital records belonging to the President issued from Hawaii. An “original birth certificate” that is “on record in accordance to state policies and procedures” in October, 2008, AND “original vital records” that are “maintained on file,” on July 27, 2009.
1.) Dr. Fukino, Director of the Department of Health on Oct. 31, 2008:
“Therefore, I as Director of Health for the State of Hawai‘i, along with the Registrar of Vital Statistics who has statutory authority to oversee and maintain these type of vital records, have personally seen and verified that the Hawai‘i State Department of Health has Sen. Obama’s original birth certificate on record in accordance with state policies and procedures.”
2.) Dr. Fukino, Director of the Department of Health on July 27, 2009:
“I, Dr. Chiyome Fukino, Director of the Hawaii State Department of Health, have seen the original vital records maintained on file by the Hawai‘i State Department of Health verifying Barack Hussein Obama was born in Hawai‘i and is a natural-born American citizen. I have nothing further to add to this statement or my original statement issued in October 2008 over eight months ago.”
• We also have a COLB presented by President Obama that indicates the information shown has been ‘Filed by Registrar.’ Fig.1 (see below) • However, we also have samples found online of HAWAII COLBs that say they have been ‘Accepted by State Registrar.’ Fig 2 & Fig 3 (see below) MOVING ON WITHOUT HAWAII’S HELP
Hawaii refuses to answer simple procedural questions. Using Nevada’s guidelines on vital statistics, we can reasonably discern the validity of President Obama’s COLB online and the “vital records” used to help verify his is a “natural-born citizen” and “born in Hawaii.” (http://www.leg.state.nv.us/nrs/NRS-440.html)
In viewing the U.S. Vital Statistics System found here: http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/misc/usvss.pdf (pp.62-63), we can see that there began a distinct effort to establish uniform practices of recording Vital Statistic information in all states....
Finish reading it here at my new blog: http://misstickly.wordpress.com/2009/10/04/our-worst-nightmare-confirmed-obama%E2%80%99s-colb-is-worthless-we-need-answers/
bookmark for later reading...
I am listening to a replay of Leo on Ken Dunbar talking about your find that once HI made comments about his BC or status it has to be made public.
So you are now saying he was born in HI? Did they send you the records? I am confused?
By the way - Thank you for all your hard work.
DEAD LINK - why are you spamming us?
why is the link broken? Post says to see link for more info, what’s up wiff dat?
Worked for me.
But he was certified as elected according to the standards of the US Congress on 1/8/2009 so whatever standards Hawaii has are irrelevant under the provisions of the US Constitution. Anybody who does not like the situation would be better served to call for legislation to establish clear and unambiguous objective standards and procedures applying to FUTURE elections.
Ping
OK - this one http://misstickly.wordpress.com/2009/10/
Gets to some content - but the one above does not.
Fast forward - has anyone read this to see if there is something new here or is it a rehash of what we have heard from Orly, et al? Or worse, just more speculation?
I have not read it all.
I usually post without reading.
Seriously.
OK .. here’s the direct link I found from
the October archives. The link at the top
takes you to the front page, not the article.
http://misstickly.wordpress.com/2009/10/
Best of success!!
bookmark
Interesting angle. Since the State addressed the issue it now becomes public information that must be fully disclosed by law.
“legal veracity” Not sure what that means, but I read somewhere here that the COLB was scanned by 0’s campaign committee and sent via e-mail as an attachment to someone at Slate or DU. And they then immediately held it up as something they had discovered on Mt. Sinai, if they believed in such things.
There are legitimate questions as to the COLB’s “veracity,” (or truthfulness/genuineness/authenticity) as we have seen the putative president obfuscate, prevaricate and equivocate—when he wasn’t actually lying like a bear rug if it suited his purposes—over-and-over these last several months.
As far as its “legality,” it hasn’t satisfied any chain-of-custody verification; it is an e-copy so authenticity and the `best evidence’ evidentiary rules remain to be satisfied; and if it were being used at, say, an impeachment trial to prove the truth of the matter stated, it would be excluded on those grounds upon objection by a competent 2nd year law student, congressman/womyn or page with a pulse.
There are a number of other evidentiary objections that I would include but for my sudden realization that it’s bedtime for this conservative birther.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.