Skip to comments.
Sarah Palin's Commonality With Exxon: Hugo Chavez
Red County ^
| February 10, 2010
| Thomas Lamb
Posted on 02/10/2010 5:12:33 AM PST by theanchoragedailyruse
There are troubling signs that are taking place in Alaska and they have to do with natural resource development.
While the left both in Alaska and nationally have been focused on Palins palm reading skills, Alaskans are beginning to answer Palins question of hows that hopey and changey thing workin out with a not too well.
With the bad Alaska economic news, increased government taxes and spending, reduced oil production; in recent news, the Alaska Superior Court overturned the Palin administrations action of denying Exxon their constitutional right to due process to administrative hearings.
(Excerpt) Read more at redcounty.com ...
TOPICS: Politics
KEYWORDS: energy; exxon; naturalgas; oil; sarahpalin
http://www.redcounty.com/sarah-palins-commonality-with-exxon-hugo-chavez/36730
To: theanchoragedailyruse
Exxon has agreed to drill, baby dril....it took a tough woman to get them to do so......
2
posted on
02/10/2010 5:16:50 AM PST
by
The Wizard
(I support Madam President, the only President in America today)
To: theanchoragedailyruse
“When it comes to Big Oil companies like Exxon, it seems Sarah Palin decided to take a play out of Hugo Chavez’s play book on stripping Exxon of their leases.”
wow.
To: theanchoragedailyruse
This article was hard to read.
I think the author was “fool” of himself.
4
posted on
02/10/2010 5:24:53 AM PST
by
DannyTN
To: theanchoragedailyruse
Good luck pimping this bilge (directed toward author, not the freeper). A little coherrency in the hit piece would help. Maybe.
5
posted on
02/10/2010 5:27:45 AM PST
by
piytar
(Ammo is hard to find! Bought some lately? Please share where at www.ammo-finder.com)
To: theanchoragedailyruse
So Exxon was sitting on its leases. And both Murkowski and Palin worked to take the leases away from Exxon since Exxon wouldn't do anything with them. And lo and behold, Exxon suddenly came up with a plan to drill.
And the author has an ad for CPAC on his website. I guess the RINOs are peeved at Palin for snubbing them, so they have to engage in literary hyperbole to retaliate.
6
posted on
02/10/2010 5:40:24 AM PST
by
dirtboy
To: don-o
Classic? Perhaps, but
this is
truly amazing. I kid you not!
...full me once, shame on you, full me twice...
7
posted on
02/10/2010 5:45:32 AM PST
by
philman_36
(Pride breakfasted with plenty, dined with poverty, and supped with infamy. Benjamin Franklin)
To: DannyTN
I think the author was fool of himself.
>guffaw
8
posted on
02/10/2010 5:47:06 AM PST
by
philman_36
(Pride breakfasted with plenty, dined with poverty, and supped with infamy. Benjamin Franklin)
To: DannyTN
9
posted on
02/10/2010 5:54:07 AM PST
by
philman_36
(Pride breakfasted with plenty, dined with poverty, and supped with infamy. Benjamin Franklin)
To: Kimberly GG
It started with the Governor before Pain.
And ExxonMobil had submitted about 30 different development plans and they were each rejected.
This is a very high pressure ~10,000 psi, natural gas field with natural gas liquids.
10
posted on
02/10/2010 6:09:02 AM PST
by
thackney
(life is fragile, handle with prayer)
To: theanchoragedailyruse
"Sarah Palin for President 2012-2013 & 1/2" It worked for Alaska
To: strongbow
She’d accomplish more in 18 months than Obama could in 4 years.
12
posted on
02/10/2010 7:55:26 AM PST
by
rintense
(Only dead fish go with the flow, which explains why Congress stinks.)
To: Kimberly GG
"wow" is right. Unless of course one's aim is to smear.
Grow up, GG. No person, Palin included, is above critique. Yet you might try to do so in a fair, dignified, and honest way. Like I do.
13
posted on
02/10/2010 8:53:49 AM PST
by
jla
To: strongbow
Alaska has the Executive Ethics Act that was manipulated by those Soros-puppet DNC bloggers to file "complaint" after "complaint" with basically NO-cost to themselves but with Legally-required costs to the State's budget and the Palin Family's own personal accounts.
Washington, D.C. has a Maginot Line of legal defense on the books for Exectuve and Legislative branch members compared to Alaska's paper shield of legal defenses (which was enacted in the wake of the Murkowski-era corruption exposures).
14
posted on
02/10/2010 9:07:59 AM PST
by
ExcursionGuy84
("Jesus, Your Love takes my breath away.")
To: theanchoragedailyruse
“Thomas entered politics in 1998. He ran as an Independent under the Alaskan Independence Party against a Republican.”
15
posted on
02/10/2010 9:24:37 AM PST
by
kanawa
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson