Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Climate.Gov, hiding the ice?
The Obama report ^ | February 9, 2010 | Darrin

Posted on 02/12/2010 8:50:21 AM PST by opentalk

The President launched a new government website on Monday called Climate.gov, hoping to prove once and for all that Global Warming is a reality, and not a myth, despite the fact that Climate Change scientists have been 'hiding the decline' for years and that the IPOCC's integrity has been strongly discredited.

Nevertheless, it didn't take too long for skeptics to realize that the con artists at Climate.gov had intentionally omitted some of the sea ice data: The sea ice data, cited from NSIDC, stops in 2007. 2008 and 2009 sea ice data and imagery, available to even the simplest of curiosity seekers at the publicly available NSIDC or even Cryosphere Today websites, is not included in the graphic. Mr. Scott chooses... 2007 as the endpoint for comparison. This leaves a reader who is “not in the know”, with the false impression that sea ice has not recovered in any way...

There’s no excuse for NOAA not showing the 2008 and 2009 sea ice data or imagery in this story. None, zilch, zero, zip, nada.

Suffice it to say, this piece on climate.gov is propaganda with a lie of omission. It is not science because it omits a portion of the data that disagrees with the article’s premise...


TOPICS: Conspiracy; Government; Science; Weather
KEYWORDS: climategate; climategov; co2hoax; data; greenhousegas; obama; propaganda

1 posted on 02/12/2010 8:50:21 AM PST by opentalk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: opentalk; Carlucci; proud_yank; meyer; Horusra; Para-Ord.45; rdl6989; mmanager; FreedomPoster; ...
 




Beam me to Planet Gore !

2 posted on 02/12/2010 8:58:30 AM PST by steelyourfaith (FReepers were opposed to Obama even before it was cool to be against Obama.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: opentalk
Arctic Ice Cap

Feb 12, 1980 vs Feb 11, 2010

Note how thick the ice is in 2010 compared to 1980. (darker purple color means thicker)

Compare Daily Sea Ice


3 posted on 02/12/2010 9:02:08 AM PST by avacado
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: avacado

Nice post. I love when this stuff can be put in an easy to understand picture...it makes it easy for the sheeple to understand.


4 posted on 02/12/2010 9:07:01 AM PST by for-q-clinton (If at first you don't succeed keep on sucking until you do succeed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: avacado

Thanks, when will they stop the dishonesty. Obama pushing this will only speed his demise. Wonder what they plan on spending to launch and run this new Gov web site.


5 posted on 02/12/2010 9:18:36 AM PST by opentalk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: steelyourfaith; All

http://igloo.atmos.uiuc.edu/cgi-bin/test/print.sh?fm=08&fd=12&fy=2005&sm=02&sd=11&sy=2010

August 12 2005, compared to today...seems to me that there is a wee bit more now then then...


6 posted on 02/12/2010 9:25:14 AM PST by keep your powder dry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: keep your powder dry
That's interesting. Thanx !
7 posted on 02/12/2010 9:28:38 AM PST by steelyourfaith (FReepers were opposed to Obama even before it was cool to be against Obama.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: keep your powder dry

I nominate this as Climate Scandal of the Day...unless another better one pops up before midnight.


8 posted on 02/12/2010 9:31:07 AM PST by dogcaller
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: opentalk

He won’t backoff on this because he knows that this will drain more money off the american people than any of his other scams. And to think that if climate change was such a threat they would use all the money raised by it to fight it. NOPE! BO going to use the money for other things like feeding his healthcare scam.


9 posted on 02/12/2010 10:10:02 AM PST by Always Independent
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: opentalk

Do these climate idiots ever ask any Eskimos? I mean they have about a 1,000 names for snow and ice, maybe they could give a firsthand account?

I never see them quoting any of the indigenous people that live ON the arctic ice cap, they love their indigenous people, but they are seemingly ignoring the Eskimos.


10 posted on 02/12/2010 10:19:53 AM PST by GraceG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: keep your powder dry
August 12 2005, compared to today...seems to me that there is a wee bit more now then then...

Comparing midsummer sea ice with mid winter ???? Huh???

11 posted on 02/12/2010 10:22:55 AM PST by Timocrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: keep your powder dry
August 12 2005, compared to today...seems to me that there is a wee bit more now then then...

Comparing August to February, regardless of the year, seems a wee bit more than disingenuous to me.

12 posted on 02/12/2010 10:32:19 AM PST by Bob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Timocrat

Yes, Sorry, I had multiple windows open trying to get the images to show up, there is a lot missing from that year, the closest i could find was December, wish still seemed a bit lower, but in either case, there is definitely not less...


13 posted on 02/12/2010 10:33:28 AM PST by keep your powder dry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson