Posted on 02/12/2010 12:35:44 PM PST by syc1959
Being born in the United States does not even make one a 'NATIVE' citizen.
Immigration and Citizenship: Process and Policy fourth edition Under Jus Soli, the following is written "The Supreme Court's first holding on the sublect suggested that the court would give a restrictive reading to the phrase, potentially disqualifing significant number of persons born within the physical boundries of the nation. In Elk v. Wilkins 112 U.S. 94, 5 S.CT. 41, 28 L.ED. 643 (1884), the court ruled that native Indians were not U.S. citizens, even if they later severed their ties with their tribes. The words "subject to the jurisdiction thereof," the court held, mean "not merely subjct in some respect or degree to the jurisdiction of the United States, but completely subject to their political jurisdiction, and owing them direct and immediate allegiange." Most Indians could not meet the test. "Indians born within the territorial limits of the United States, members of, and owing immediate allegiance to, one of the Indian Tribes, (an alien through dependent power,) although in a geographical sense born in the United States, are no more 'born in the United States and subject to the jurisdiction thereof,'*** then the children of subjects of any foreign government born within the domain of that government ***. Id. at 102. It continues that Congress eventually passed legislation with the 'Allotment Act of 1887, that conferred citizenship on many Indians.
The fact remains, the Court held, complete and sole Jurisdiction. As I have held that being born anywhere in the United States, jurisdiction is required, sole and complete, and Barack Hussein Obama was already claimed by British jurisdiction under the British Nationailty Act of 1948, and as such fails the United states Constitutional requirement of a Natural Born Citizen.
“When Barack Obama Jr. was born on Aug. 4,1961, in Honolulu, Kenya was a British colony, still part of the United Kingdom’s dwindling empire. As a Kenyan native, Barack Obama Sr. was a British subject whose citizenship status was governed by The British Nationality Act of 1948. That same act governed the status of Obama Sr.‘s children.
Barack Hussein Obama did not have sole jurisdiction under the United States.
Title 8 and the 14th Amendment clearlt state the following;
All persons born or naturalized in the United States and subject to the jurisdiction thereof
Note: 'subject to the jurisdiction thereof'
“My assumption and my understanding is that if you are born of American parents, you are naturally a natural-born American citizen,” Chertoff replied.
“That is mine, too,” said Leahy
-Homeland Security SecretaryMichael Chertoff and Senator Patrick Leahy, (April 03, 2008)
Now, remind everyone here...wasn’t Obama’s daddy a foreigner? Doesn’t that make him NOT have American parents. Note the plural.
http://www.factcheck.org/elections-2008/born_in_the_usa.html
There you go. Seal, date stamp, registrar’s signature, certificate number... the whole works.
Fact: A Hawaii "Birth Certificate" of Barack's claimed year of birth would reveal the hospital of his birth, and citizenship of his parents.
Fact: There is no logical reason on earth for Barack Obama to hold back this birth record that would provide this needed citizenship information.
What does seem logical at this point is that Barack is "pleading the fifth" so as to not incriminate himself in criminal activity. He has already sworn in election documents that he is a natural born citizen.
Your assessment that this is a racist issue is far from the truth. This issue is solely an issue on whether or not the constitution is the supreme law of the land or not. To Barack Obama the constitution may as well be a piece of toilet paper by how he has treated the people who wish to verify that he is indeed a natural born citizen by viewing this piece of evidence called a birth certificate!
Why would I need to learn French to read the United States Constitution?
Drat! You caught me! LOL!
See? Not that hard to fake a COLB.
Cheers
I thought they were the SAME document. It appears that they are not one and the same, again proving multiple version of a forged document.
DailyKos - no seal, signiture
FTS - no seal, signiture
factCheck #1 - no seal, signiture
factcheck #2 - seal
factcheck 3# - no seal, signiture
Wow, again proving criminal activity bt team Obama
Are your saying that UK law supersedes US law and the UK dictates who is and who is not a US citizen?
You didn’t have to look again, nor is it likely that you did. The phrase ‘natural born citizen’ is a special phrase in that section of the Constitution, and must be interpreted as a special more exclusionary requirement than simple citizenship.
As you read it, as I understand, it loses all special meaning.
HI Attorney General’s office refuses to corroborate Obama’s HI Birth
WHY?
RACISM?
Freaking disgusting criminal insanity to say or think that.
DUH
Born in Hawaii to a foreign daddy?
Under oath and cross examination, and subject to penalties for perjury — who has so testified that Obama was born in Hawaii?
What better way to prosecute Barack Hussein Obama for treason, fraud, criminal fraud, and a host of other charges, then demnanding he produce the evidence against himself.
He’s the one that stated he was qualified, knoweing full well that he was not eligible.
Because it would be against the law.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.